SARM Resolution on protection of property?

[chuckChuck]

Petty rural property crime is widespread. It is very difficult to stop because it is opportunists who don't give a shit or are out of money. Things like batteries, tools, fuel, parts, booster cables go missing or are "borrowed". I have had only a handfull of incidents over 30 years.

But serious threats to personal safety by strangers in rural areas is very rare and very localized. Domestic violence would be a much higher risk especially for farm women.

The biggest risk to my family is from assholes who drink and drive or text and drive. This is wide spread and part of the culture. What does SARM have to say about that?

Two stories. Years ago my dad caught the neighbor stealing gas. No explanation, he probably just ran out of gas at home. Did we get out the gun and threaten him or take a shot? Nope better to let him leave with his few gallons of gas and his embarrassment that will last a lifetime.

In another case a neighbor with a drinking problem was cutoff at the local watering hole. He went home and got his gun, came back and demanded a drink. Did the bartender pull out his sawed off shot gun and tell him to bugger off? Nope that could have resulted in a lot worse situation.

[sofa.king]

Something needs to be done I saw on Facebook someone had young calves stolen last nite. The rancher tried to get a plate number but they got away. This is when you need some of those mother in law type cows on patrol at night.
.

[RTK]

Chuck Chuck your last post adds to a constructive conversation. Although I do not agree with all you suggested in your post - I can at least read it and consider your point of view.

I think small thefts leads to larger thefts but regardless a theft is a theft.

Your stats maybe correct and quite likely are but one violent encounter with someone entering your property is all it takes.

I have had numerous (a dozen in the last 5 years) individuals enter my yard; some I am concerned about and others I happily offer assistance.

A neighbor needing fuel - why would he not ask your father; if he was not around leave a note or leave something of value to make it known he was desperate for fuel and planned to return later to pay for it or at least tell your father he took some.

Had your father returned unexpectedly it would then be a simple matter of your neighbor leaving the yard immediately if requested and making a phone call that evening to explain himself. A simple hey Joe I ran out of fuel you were not around so I was at your tank borrowing 10 gallons - I left my drivers license in your inside your screen door because I had no cash so you would know it was me...

I do not have time to comment on the bar story - but someone walks into a bar with a gun demanding a drink is not acceptable in my books and I hope he was charged and spent a little time in jail for that lack of judgement.

[rockpile]

Do you guys in Sask have a Rural Crime Watch program? It really helps a lot.

[LEP]

Another example of Chuck chuck believing everything he reads. You don't have a ****in clue.

I am at SARM. I am from the RM of Kindersley that put forward the resolution. It was very carefully written to not mention race or incite vigilante behavior. But instead, deal with the very real situation of the legal liability of resisting a theft or invasion of property.

When Lionel was interviewed by the media they tried multiple ways to bait him into making it racial. One reporter even suggested it was probably better that he hide under the bed if someone was breaking into his house.

He never mentioned anything about using a rifle or shooter the burglar. Those words are the reporters.

Bottomline if someone breaks into my house don't expect me to put on a pot of coffee.

[Oliver88]

We clearly need stronger private property rights on the farm and at our house.
Hopefully the resolution gets a conversation started that leads to that.

CC is showing once again how out of touch he is with farmers in Saskatchewan.......just remember he is also a big proponent of Trudeau, the carbon tax, expensive electricity, etc.

Good job to all involved at bringing up this resolution at the SARM convention. 👍🏻

[LEP]

Resolution no. 34- 17A

Rural Crime
RM of Kindersley no. 290

WHEREAS crime has increased substantially in rural communities and whereas individuals do not have sufficient rights to protect themselves and property;

BE IT RESOLVED that SARM lobby the federal government to expand the rights and justification for an individual to defend or protect himself,herself and person under care and property.


Suck it chucky

[RTK]

LEP - I agree with your posts and thanks for posting the actual resolution for everyone to read and draw thier own conclusions as to whether or not they support this resolution.

I am going to challenge you by asking how closing with "suck it..." brings merit to your post.

This a major issue and folks who realize there is problem need to accurately, forcefully and professionally state and argue the case for change.

[chuckChuck]

Resolution no. 34- 17A

Rural Crime
RM of Kindersley no. 290

WHEREAS crime has increased substantially in rural communities and whereas individuals do not have sufficient rights to protect themselves and property;

BE IT RESOLVED that SARM lobby the federal government to expand the rights and justification for an individual to defend or protect himself,herself and person under care and property.


Suck it chucky

So what does this resolution actually do except encourage vigilantism? It is purposely vague and therefore useless. It is pretty clear in this province after what happened to Colton Bushie that some people think it is okay to use violence or kill someone for alleged or real property crime. Especially if they happen to have brown skin!

What this resolution implies is that SARM wants the criminal code changed to allow excessive force or maybe even deadly force to be allowed in the protection of property.

LEP do you really support that? If you do you are a danger to the public. And the Saskatchewan Minister of Justice does not support you or SARM on this piece of crap.

As I said before there are numerous constructive ways to prevent and reduce rural crime but SARM is wasting its time on this resolution.

[LEP]

This is a perfect example of why chucky is in the fake news business. Where does it say the resolution is in response to the Colton Bushie? Where does it promote excessive violence?

It is a response to the fact rural crime is up in our area. I have lost fuel from the farm, l have lost grain twice, and gas twice from my vehicle on my driveway in town. I haven't caught anyone in the act but if I did I would overtake and detain the individual or individuals until the cops came. However presently, if I caused a hangnail on the thiefs, I would be in more trouble than they were. I shouldn't be able to put them in the hospital unless they are threatening same to me or causing harm to myself or my loved ones.

In our area most of the crime is caused by he drug culture and needy neighbors not by persons of a particular race.

[LEP]

RTK , yes you are c

[LEP]

RTK , yes you are correct, my comment was out of line. I do apologize for saying that.

I am alittle frustrated with the distorted responses about the intent of the resolution that it promotes violence in general and in particular against a certain race.