Trump's Speech on Paris Accord

[grassfarmer]

...I was also indirectly challenging posters on Agriville to explain how they would cut their GHG emisions by 30% in correlation with the Paris agreement. So Mustardman let's hear your proposals and retiring doesn't count.

I tried by highlighting the lack of analysis of the various components of the methane and cattle factors contributing to GHG emissions but you didn't seem interested.....

[fjlip]

The WORLD is TOO F*CKING BIG to calculate accurately and effect any change that could be even calculated. Canada 1.6% of the planet reduces CO2 buy a minuscule amount....will make no difference. Plus trust WHO to do such calculations???? The ideas are absurd. The estimated/ guessed crisis is 50 years away, most of us will be a memory. Who gives a shit, life is short, don't worry about the future enjoy life.
If you who the rest of us call climate change NAZIS are up all night in mortal fear of impending earth wide DOOM, I feel real sorry for you. You are wasting your lives. In the 70's all manner of evidence suggested ice age/global cooling/crop failures. Maybe a couple years were crap, but we are still here, no ice age, just more BS from peer reviewed liars.

[sofa.king]

When the so called professional scientists can predict the weather 1 week in advance with any accuracy I may then start to listen to their science but until then you global warmers can ****off.

[grassfarmer]

It looks like we are being lead into a new dark age by Trump and his flat earth followers on Agriville. You'll have to excuse me I'm not joining you on the trip backwards.

[sofa.king]

If we're going into the dark ages may have to throw a tax on to enlighten the world. Makes perfect sense .

[fjlip]

When the so called professional scientists can predict the weather 1 week in advance with any accuracy I may then start to listen to their science but until then you global warmers can ****off.

That says it all about the peer reviewed dreamed up scenario...

[blueversi]

It looks like we are being lead into a new dark age by Trump and his flat earth followers on Agriville. You'll have to excuse me I'm not joining you on the trip backwards.

No one wants you along anyway.

[wakopa]

Why do scientists lie? In order of decreasing disingenuousness, the main motives are:

Profit: Sometimes there's money in it -- a lot of money. This may be why, according to Fanelli's report, "surveys conducted among clinical, medical and pharmacological researchers appeared to yield higher rates of misconduct than surveys in other fields" [1].
Laziness and ease of perpetration: It's so much easier to just make up data than to perform all those tedious measurements. And in most cases, no one is going to question you about it.
Career pressure: This is the most common reason. The data isn't going your way and you may fail to get your thesis accepted, or not get tenure, or miss a promotion, or lose your grant or your job.
Pride: Scientists are as hungry for praise and prestige as other mortals. And no one likes to be forced to admit he's wrong. So, when someone contradicts your earlier work, you may be willing to cut a few corners to defend yourself, or to prevent your opponent's paper from being published.
Ideology: Many feel that if a cause is worth dying for, it's worth lying for. As we shall consider below, liberal intellectuals are particularly susceptible to this weakness.
Next, let's consider the methodology. Aside from plagiarism (which is not relevant here), scientific lying follows the same three methods of concealment that are used in all scams:

Lying: the fabrication of nonexistent data or the falsification of data by manipulating research materials, equipment, processes, or the data itself.
Hiding: omitting data that does not fit your conclusion and/or ignoring or suppressing conflicting data from other sources. Another form of hiding is shouting down the opposition by seeking the greatest possible media exposure [2], repeatedly claiming a dubious or nonexistent consensus for your views, or contriving to prevent the opposition from publication in technical journals by malicious refereeing.
Misdirection: massaging the data with biasing statistical or processing techniques, choosing the model or graphic plot that best suits your conclusion, misinterpreting data or suppressing alternative interpretations, forming unfounded assertions or extrapolations, etc. This is a vast field in itself, one in which the CRU and their IPCC brethren seem to have broken new ground.


Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/12/why_scientists_lie_and_what_to.html#ixzz4j4pE6hsp
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

[Hamloc]

It is not that I am not interested, it would be in my opinion that only a small percentage of producers would have the ability to finish cattle on farm. That ship has sailed. I also would be very surprised if it would make the 30% reduction proposed by the Paris agreement. I do agree the present system has some very inefficient aspects. I am simply interested in how existing farmers that are fans of the Paris agreement would reduce ghg production by 30%.

[blackpowder]

Trump might be an sob but he would get my vote all day long for his balls to say f u to the un and that accord.
When the wiseguy college boys write me off as a neanderthal my give a shit walks out the door.

[mustardman]

When you boys go spouting off about the Great weather Climate change will give us ,Remember the Downs Sides more Ticks Carrying Lyme disease , more long term droughts ,more Violent storms, more years of 30 inches of rain and the Next year **** all. Oh yea it'll be peachy

[chuckChuck]

Believe what you want to believe and the world and climate change research will go on without Agriville. Nobody gives a shit what a small group of farmers on Agriville think about science, climate change or anything else for that matter.

There isn't one Premier in Canada who will openly say he doesn't believe in the science that shows humans are causing rapid climate change because of greenhouse gas emissions. Even Brad Wall won't say it. He may not like a carbon tax but he is well aware of the science.

So the reality for climate change deniers is you have lost this debate and the world is moving ahead without you or your ideas.

[mustardman]

Trump claims to be a Great Businessman
This will go down as the WORST Business decision of his life

[sumdumguy]

Now I know what left-wing means. It means you left your brains a ways back, you niaive pansies.

[stonepicker]

Mo,curly,and larry, you've been duped! The end.