Yes Grefer, the winds can wear you down. The stronger the quicker. The stronger with heat and low humidity sucks the life blood out of everything, including me. But the crop is not past the point of no return here yet. One canola field will have shitty patches in it even if it rains. The other that was seeded on 450 acres of pea stubble isnt bad at all considering what its endured but even if it rains you won't see it on the cover of any magazines or within it's cover either! But a rain would sure help, hard to believe how it's managing to hang on.
Re hail insurance. If there are only 4 stalks of wheat per square foot and two are broken over badly by hail...that's 50% damage, same.if there's only two per square foot and one got hit...50%...end of story. I am not aware of any clause stating minimum plants per square foot affecting the payout. If they don't want to insure poorly established crops or thin ones maybe they shouldn't accept the premium. Its a huge ****ing gamble piling on the indemnity in hopes of hailing out a shitty crop. Pay more premium for extra coverage and if it doesn't hail you still have a shitty crop that you have to pay extra premium with.
Re hail insurance. If there are only 4 stalks of wheat per square foot and two are broken over badly by hail...that's 50% damage, same.if there's only two per square foot and one got hit...50%...end of story. I am not aware of any clause stating minimum plants per square foot affecting the payout. If they don't want to insure poorly established crops or thin ones maybe they shouldn't accept the premium. Its a huge ****ing gamble piling on the indemnity in hopes of hailing out a shitty crop. Pay more premium for extra coverage and if it doesn't hail you still have a shitty crop that you have to pay extra premium with.
Comment