Ezra Levant is a clairvoyant?

[bgmb]

Ezra is a different duck with an interesting business model. Create some kind of crisis then Ask for donations to help the cause. Find that part of it and the hyped up side show style presentation totally sickening although I do agree with some of his principles.

[grassfarmer]

Let me get this straight, your comparing Ezra Levant's viewership to a newspaper that has existed for 125 years and because his numbers are small in comparison he is a failure? Look at yourself, if I understand correctly you direct market your beef, how do the numbers you market daily compare to Cargill's? Does that make you a failure?

You and Parsley need to get your stories straight. She was the one that brought the Toronto Star up claiming that Levant was more popular than CBC or the Star. I agree with you though - yes he is a joke compared to a paper that has been in existence for 125 years with 2 million readership.

[blackpowder]

Thankfully Mr. Levant does not have unlimited federal dollars to keep lawsuits boondoggled.
Not like another media source we know.

[foragefarmer]

If Ezra Levant had any journalistic talent Breitbart News would have pick him up by now. Just a wannabe. Fools and their money are soon parted!!

[grassfarmer]

Even the Conservative "RedState" is ridiculing this latest stunt.

[URL="http://www.redstate.com/jimjamitis/2017/06/19/laura-loomer-fleecing-new-right/"]http://http://www.redstate.com/jimjamitis/2017/06/19/laura-loomer-fleecing-new-right/[/URL]

[Guest]

Thanks for those links, burnt.

Chuck chuck, do you really believe Mr. Whatchamacallems when he pisses on your leg and tells you Ezra is washed up? :

"who are read by almost no one and whose arguments fall apart by the seams".

"Almost no one" ??

Wow.

Look at u-tube stats:

Ezra Levant's video subscribers as of today: 802,672
CBC's video subscribers as of today:122,200
Toronto Star video subscribers as of today: 7,691

1 man with his loyal band.
1 Government-run & funded, agency
1 corporation


Toronto Star hires haters to write opinion pieces; who's obscure value lies in lining cat-piddlepans. TS pays with declining readers....

You know chuck, that Ezra is a force to reckon with. Happening stuff. As are his supporters. We've been there. Done this. And we know how to take down a Govt run corporation...

Get up to speed, chuck chuck, or you inevitably get dumped off into Margaret's Boy's "um um um" world every Friday, where the smoke, the hot air and the lies rise high into the chambers of emboldened secrecy.

Pars

Like, Like,Like,Like !!!!!!

[chuckChuck]

Pars views hardly fit the mainstream of the CPC. Pars and Levant may have a few true believers in their camps but they are a sideshow when it comes to mainstream politics in this country. Good thing Pars can help out Levant with some wealth transfers, as without it Levant wouldn't have a job. It's good of you Pars to help out the needy Levant. I didnt know you had a social conscience.

[blackpowder]

At least she has a choice which media outlet to support with her money. After of course, she funds unwillingly the one she does not support.

[chuckChuck]

At least she has a choice which media outlet to support with her money. After of course, she funds unwillingly the one she does not support.

Don't confuse Levant's one sided opinions with real journalism that is found on public and private broadcasters and other forms of media. Levant is an activist of a particular point of view that Pars is welcome to support. But he is not a journalist. Real journalists cover the story in a fair and balanced way making sure not to be partisan or favouring a particular point of view by seeking out and reporting many points of view.

[chuckChuck]

At least she has a choice which media outlet to support with her money. After of course, she funds unwillingly the one she does not support.

If the CBC gets about a billion dollars in funding from taxpayers that adds up to a whopping $30 per capita. I am sure Pars sends more than that to Levant! There are a lot of original shows on CBC that fully commercial radio and TV won't do and most of it has no political content. Having an independent public broadcaster is common in many European nations including the BBC in Great Britain.

If you remember Kevin Oleary got his media start on Dragons Den and then the Lang and Oleary Exchange. Oleray must be a left winger then? There is a way more balance on CBCs political coverage than you will ever find on Rebel media.

If Pars and you don't like the CBC you can choose to vote for a party that does not support the CBC.

[blackpowder]

Some folk get testy regarding cbc.
I agree with your journalism comment.
We do get value from a public broadcasting system.
Perhaps all media, being run by people, have a slight bias. It would only be natural.
Services being run by managers not your altruistic and pure journalist.
One of my points is that the cbc has no reins. Unlimited off budget legal.
Another, a well known "fact" in T.O. is not necessarily a fact in the ROC.
Stopped watching more than a few moments of cbc years ago. Granted, several reasons.
Funny, I watch far more PBS now than cbc if i watch tv at all.
Commercial free is suppossd to allow freedom. Nonsense. Everybody gets paid.
Other public systems (which i enjoy) answer to sponsors, donors.
There are a fat few, 3000 miles away with an open checkbook, signed only by the like minded. Paid by all of us.
Some feel very comfortable having a Post Office like drone force running everything.
No waves, no threats, nobody getting ahead of me. Gee, doesnt work anywhere else in nature.
Let the special interest groups buy their own airtime. Let the people who believe, buy it.
Let the people who choose to watch it, pay for it. Dont tell me its "my" broadcaster. Doesnt represent much about me at all. And sorry no, I dont watch rebel nor do i donate to any.

[chuckChuck]

Some folk get testy regarding cbc.
I agree with your journalism comment.
We do get value from a public broadcasting system.
Perhaps all media, being run by people, have a slight bias. It would only be natural.
Services being run by managers not your altruistic and pure journalist.
One of my points is that the cbc has no reins. Unlimited off budget legal.
Another, a well known "fact" in T.O. is not necessarily a fact in the ROC.
Stopped watching more than a few moments of cbc years ago. Granted, several reasons.
Funny, I watch far more PBS now than cbc if i watch tv at all.
Commercial free is suppossd to allow freedom. Nonsense. Everybody gets paid.
Other public systems (which i enjoy) answer to sponsors, donors.
There are a fat few, 3000 miles away with an open checkbook, signed only by the like minded. Paid by all of us.
Some feel very comfortable having a Post Office like drone force running everything.
No waves, no threats, nobody getting ahead of me. Gee, doesnt work anywhere else in nature.
Let the special interest groups buy their own airtime. Let the people who believe, buy it.
Let the people who choose to watch it, pay for it. Dont tell me its "my" broadcaster. Doesnt represent much about me at all. And sorry no, I dont watch rebel nor do i donate to any.

Yes there are lots of legitimate concerns about how the CBC spends our money and their programming choices. But the alternative of having no public broadcaster leads to fewer choices and more commercially oriented crap like reality tv shows that are painfull to watch. It is hard to be everything to everyone. Perhaps the CBC needs to focuss on doing less commercial shows. CBC 1 radio does a better job than TV but there is a lot that is not that good anymore. PBS is good for some things but doesn't do a 24 hours news channel. It is big country with widely varying viewpoints and perspectives in 2 languages. It is a big job and can always be done better.