The idiot also thinks castro was a humanitarium martyr What a useless pos
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Omar F*UCKING Khadr is getting $10.5 milion
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
Guest
-
I'll add this post here from Facebook, not my post but something that sums the situation up well in my opinion.
"Okay, I'm ****ing sick of the idiocy and done with writing a diatribe every single time a friend posts about how they're upset that Trudeau is giving a terrorist $10m. You people are.... wilfully ignorant and hypocritical. Here's why. (And I thoroughly suggest reading the entire post. If you know me, you know I'm neither stupid, nor an apologist. I am pure ****ing science, and this post is such. Read it before making an ass of yourself by posting about how we just gave a terrorist money).
The story (the facts we know).
* Canadian born Khadr was taken to Afghanistan at 15 years old, by his father. We don't know if he wanted to go, and we don't know why they went. There has been zero evidence put forth to suggest the trip had anything to do with terrorism. Regardless, as he was only 15, he had no choice in the matter.
(EDIT: He was actually taken to Afghanistan at 9 years of age. He was taken to Gitmo at 15)
* Khadr was found in critical condition following a firefight. The mission debrief report filed by the US troops stated that a middle aged man threw a grenade, which killed one US soldier. The grenadier was shot in the head and confirmed killed.
* Khadr was taken to Guantanamo Bay prison. No charges were filed against him at that time.
* Several years later, formal charges were filed. These charges were technically not even charges of war crimes, as if they were true, Khadr would be considered an enemy combatant during a time of war, and thus everything he was accused of doing, was legal under rules of engagement. He was denied access to a lawyer at this point and no trial date was set. He was held in detention and tortured for nearly 10 years.
* Nearly a decade later, an addendum to the original mission debrief was submitted, which identified the grenadier as Khadr by name. The description was updated to match that of a 15 year old Khadr. The original report was not rescinded. No one knows who made the addendum. No US personnel present during the firefight confirms the addendum.
* A week later, Khadr is offered a plea deal. The terms of the deal were to admit guilt to all charges and serve a few more years in a Canadian prison, or refuse to admit guilt and be denied trial indefinitely.
* Khadr takes the plea deal, is transferred to Canada.
* Khadr sues the Canadian government for their involvement in his illegal detention, torture, and lack of a trial.
All of the above is true as far as anyone knows. That is the official story, from both the Canadian and US governments. They have said straight out that Khadr would not be offered a trial unless he took the plea deal. Just let that sink in for a moment.
Now let me ask you a question.
As a Canadian, what do you stand for? Do you believe that you, as a Canadian, have the right to be presumed innocent, until proven guilty, as well as the right to a fair and quick trial? I know this is hard for many of you to consider without jumping to "oh, but he's a terrorist, so **** him, he's a traitor and doesn't deserve anything", but we'll get to that in a minute. Seriously consider this. Do you believe you have, as a Canadian, the inalienable right to everything laid out in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms?
If you do, but still think Khadr does not, because he is a terrorist, let me ask you; "How do you know he is guilty?" There was no trial for 10 years, and he was only offered a trial on the condition that he plead guilty. How do we, as Canadians, determine guilt? Have you read and understood the Chart of Rights and Freedoms? It's entire purpose is precisely to ensure that what happened to Khadr, is not allowed to happen. Period.
Now I know many of you still can't get past the "but he's a traitor so he doesn't deserve a trial" even though neither you, nor me, nor the US or Canadian government were able to provide ANY evidence whatsoever, of his guilt (no evidence was submitted during his trial, presumably because none exists), but that doesn't matter. Let me explain the problem to you.
You are worried that terrorists are trying to take away your freedoms as a Canadian right? They're trying to force Sharia law upon us and we as Canadians, won't stand for that right?
Do you see where I'm going here? Presuming Khadr's guilt, with no evidence and without trial, is precisely what the terrorists want to do to Canada. Isn't that your concern? Does it not strike you then, that by saying that Khadr doesn't deserve a fair trial because he is a terrorist, with absolutely no evidence, nor a trial to prove the charges, that you are doing precisely what you are worried the terrorists are trying to do do us? A presumption of guilt, no trial, a decade of detention and torture. Is that not Sharia law?
At this point, I don't think any of us should even be concerned about Khadrs innocence or guilt. He is inconsequential at this point. The REAL concern for all Canadians, is that our government denied a Canadian citizen his inalienable rights, guaranteed to him under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. They did EXACTLY what you are worried the terrorists are trying to do. If Khadr was guilty, a trial probably would have proven such, so why was he denied a trial?
For your information, the Canadian government did not simply offer up an apology and $10m for no reason. They were sued. The Canadian Supreme Court found in favour of Khadr, in that the Canadian government was in breach of Canadian and International law. That money will mostly be covering his legal fees. But here's where you should be more concerned about the money. The Canadian government spent $120m of your money, defending itself for committing what is legally, war crimes. Seriously. Your government, was just successfully sued, for war crimes. Crimes they committed not only against Khadr, but against the entire Canadian public. They assured us that we would all be given a fair trial, but now we know that is not true. They assured us that we will always be presumed innocent until proven guilty. We know that is not true. They took your money, money which could have been spent on building half a hospital or something, and spent it instead, on committing war crimes, and crimes directly against the Charter on which our country was founded.
In summation:
If you believe Khadr did not deserve a fair and quick trial, you are not Canadian. You do not stand for what Canada stands for. You are saying very clearly, that you don't care about evidence, treating people (who we presume are innocent until proven guilty) with basic decency, or your own or anyone else's right to a fair trial. You are, quite literally, openly supporting about half of Sharia law. You ****wits."
Comment
-
Wow the Liberal Bull shit continues.
This is a useless piece of shit. That the USA army should of dealt with on the battle field.
He is not a child soldier.
Liberals can make a terrorist into a saint.
CBC spins the liberal bullshit.
Oh look at my socks as trudeau tries to distract.
Its like the carbon tax every thing out of a liberal is total bullshit.
Grass if vacationing in Afghanistan is your kind of vacation you and your boy wonder should visit and do humanitarian aid.
Comment
-
Grassfarmer I have only 1 question for you....
If that u.s. army medic trying to help and was killed by the terrorist was your son/daughter would you feel the same about this situation as you do right now? Would you be happy to give up the cash and hand out apologies?
Comment
-
like i said i do not like it either.
but
the 12 14 year olds hitler sent to the front in the dying days of WW 2.
should they have been imprisoned for years.
tortured.
charged with murder , if they had happened to kill someone in the process.
Ya you are correct, Arrar had done nothing.
but how good is a confession under torture. by Kader
again not defending any crazy terrorist.
but
there is a lot going on.
a drone strike , that takes out innocent people too , is not murder. for some reason .
but a 10- 13 year boy , in his home country is under attack, that maybe, maybe , happened
to kill an foreign attacker is a murderer. ???????????
do you really think if the roles were reversed, and an american kid that killed a foreign attacker
in Iowa , that he should be charged with murder.
yes we love to hate them, . and maybe rightly so
but are we going to have the same morals , they do ?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by SASKFARMER3 View PostAnd JT did it quietly under the table so that he could cash the check before the widow from the USA could get it. Useless piece of grass.
Liberal way thug is more important than a widow who this asshole killed.
Canadian Taxpayers Federation is saying this is equivalent to $20.1 million of taxable income!!!
It's disgusting that this is happening and also disgusting that grassy and other lefties are sticking up for this Islamic terrorist....but it's always predictable the type of people who will be okay with these type of acts.Last edited by Oliver88; Jul 7, 2017, 09:28.
Comment
-
" Canadian born Khadr was taken to Afghanistan at 15 years old, by his father. We don't know if he wanted to go, and we don't know why they went. There has been zero evidence put forth to suggest the trip had anything to do with terrorism."
They fought for the OTHER Side, maybe even KILLED our Canadian men or women.
That should be reason enough to CANCEL their Canadian citizenship and be off the hook for any consequences...That is Turdo and preceding government's mistake. If we could vote that is what the majority would want, guaranteed. But hell, let Turdo wear this, good riddance if it destroys him!
Comment
-
-
So you'd all be ok if your teenage kids in Saskatchewan get pulled over for speeding, taken to jail with no charges laid, not allowed to see a lawyer for two years then after 8 years find them charged with a fatal hit and run? That's without including any torture. I think not, you'd be singing a different tune then.
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment