• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Liberals now are Blaming the Conservative for problems with Nafta Negotiations.

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Just a ? I really don't know.
    Do you guys think the USA may have a little sour taste after 9/11 and then Ritz merges with and will eventually turn over CWB to Saudi Arabia in deal?

    Comment


      #12
      most of the regulations to restrict our access to generics came from the conservitives.
      because their company bosses told them too.
      hell an old conservative was the head of chem manufacturers lobby group.( Hepworth i think ) PMRA or something

      and you want to blame the liberals. they are not a lot better , but they were not holding the knife cutting your throat
      Harper and Mulroney were.

      ya more important , to bring a few hundred $ of booze back . than paying 10,s of thousands more for your ag chemical needs every year . silly me.
      Last edited by sawfly1; Jul 21, 2017, 15:20.

      Comment


        #13
        Saw fly wtf Harper had a knife to your throat wtf are you talking about.
        Yet JT look at my socks here is a useless carbon tax and let's had our billions to the world it's just stupid tax payers of canada anyway.

        Comment


          #14
          This edition of the Liberals has shown no interest in wealth creation. It's all about wealth redistribution.
          There is enough for everyone. Take from the rich and give to the poor. Probably get you elected a couple of times.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by wmoebis View Post
            Just a ? I really don't know.
            Do you guys think the USA may have a little sour taste after 9/11 and then Ritz merges with and will eventually turn over CWB to Saudi Arabia in deal?
            Hardly, given that the US has remained in bed with the Saudis constantly since 9/11. Remember in the chaos of that day the Bush regime scurried to get Bin Laden's extended family on a plane and out of the country before most of us had even heard of the Bin Laden connection? Trump is continuing the tradition of sucking up to the Saudis. No ban on Saudis in his muslim travel ban despite that having been the source of most of the 9/11 attackers. Most in the American administration will have heard of neither the CWB or Ritz.

            Comment


              #16
              Actually grassy, I agree with you. All US governments democrat or republican have bowed to the Saudis.

              I really wonder how they can hold such a grip on the President given human rights issues and links to terrorism. It is very powerful whatever it is.

              Comment


                #17
                SF3 all that good stuff,
                UPOV97
                with the implications of farmers never being able to own a seed again.
                so that patents will never run out

                and extending existing patents from 15 to 25 years,

                all the rules , and regulations written by the conservatives
                that allows the PMRA to soak us 3 or 4 times the world price
                for off patent chemicals. for years and years .

                with an operation your size , you must be a committed conservative to willingly dish out 25-50 thousand a year in increased chemical costs

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by LEP View Post
                  Actually grassy, I agree with you. All US governments democrat or republican have bowed to the Saudis.

                  I really wonder how they can hold such a grip on the President given human rights issues and links to terrorism. It is very powerful whatever it is.
                  Some reasons are given as the following -

                  1) the Saudis despise Iran (Iran being no friend of the US either) and want the US to destroy it,, so friendship with the US is seen as an element of regional balance of power.

                  2) Saudi Arabia is a source of cheap and easy oil, even though the US is nearly self-sufficient and can replace it more readily than in the past.

                  3) Saudi Arabia is an Islamic stronghold and a major influence among the Muslim world. Tick them off and you've managed t openly turn a large percentage of Muslims against you. Not a good strategy if you want your head and neck to remain intact.

                  It is an alliance of convenience, not mutual love. And the dynamics are shifting.

                  So, when that potty breaks, there will be a stink. Watch out.
                  Last edited by burnt; Jul 22, 2017, 03:50.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Canada never did live up to the agreement. The agreement promised no duties between borders by 2004. I'm not sure if there are duties going the other way.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      What grip do Saudis have? Petro USD. Saudis jump ship from USD oil trade and Uncle Sam won't be able to print $ fast enough or add 0's in time.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...