We are looking at upgrading our seed treating equipment to treat seed on our farm and for our seed customers.
Part of my due diligence was to understand the regulatory issues and compliance requirements to treat for other farmers.
This took me to the AWSA that will oversee regulations and compliance.
The bottom line is that all seed treatments that are designated as commercial starting in 2018 will only be made available to accredited commercial seed treating operations.
The draft list of such treatments is yet to be published.
I asked if treatments such as Insure from BASF are on the draft list as of now and they said yes.
The list will be out in weeks.
I should note that as of June of this year there are also new regulatory requirements out there for all portable seed treaters covering off the mobile guys and retail locations that were going around and treating on farm.
I would suggest that almost 95% of seed treated in our region is treated on farm by farmers.
Losing the ability to get seed treatments and treating seed on farm with the equipment of our choice will not be good.
I remember the debate when these regulatory issues were coming forward, but do we understand the implications for the next growing season?
For farmers sake I would hope that policy and regulation would encourage the higher utilization of seed treatments to prevent disease and improve agronomics but not at a much higher cost due to regulation and regulatory creep.
What have others heard on this matter?
Part of my due diligence was to understand the regulatory issues and compliance requirements to treat for other farmers.
This took me to the AWSA that will oversee regulations and compliance.
The bottom line is that all seed treatments that are designated as commercial starting in 2018 will only be made available to accredited commercial seed treating operations.
The draft list of such treatments is yet to be published.
I asked if treatments such as Insure from BASF are on the draft list as of now and they said yes.
The list will be out in weeks.
I should note that as of June of this year there are also new regulatory requirements out there for all portable seed treaters covering off the mobile guys and retail locations that were going around and treating on farm.
I would suggest that almost 95% of seed treated in our region is treated on farm by farmers.
Losing the ability to get seed treatments and treating seed on farm with the equipment of our choice will not be good.
I remember the debate when these regulatory issues were coming forward, but do we understand the implications for the next growing season?
For farmers sake I would hope that policy and regulation would encourage the higher utilization of seed treatments to prevent disease and improve agronomics but not at a much higher cost due to regulation and regulatory creep.
What have others heard on this matter?
Comment