Thanks
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Canola Fertility
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
-
Next to none would be lost all spring applied at seeding 2-2.5 inches deep sideband with shank not mrb disc. Yeah I agree all soild are different. And I would not expect all areas will be able to grow 60 canola. I will say we hit 50 in the early 2000s with canolas that by the numbers had 30% lower yield potential than current varieties and we were using roughly 2/3 the fert we are now.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bgmb View PostNext to none would be lost all spring applied at seeding 2-2.5 inches deep sideband with shank not mrb disc. Yeah I agree all soild are different. And I would not expect all areas will be able to grow 60 canola. I will say we hit 50 in the early 2000s with canolas that by the numbers had 30% lower yield potential than current varieties and we were using roughly 2/3 the fert we are now.
I'll only say on the first part of your post... You need to understand the N cycle a lot more.
Have a read.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bgmb View PostKlause I understand the nitrogen cycle. I dont consider applied nitrogen fertilizer that enters the nitrogen cycle "lost"
No one said it's a waste. I'm also not advocating the end of using nitrogen. I'm saying become more efficient with it. You're putting on about 140 lbs the plant will use about 48% of that. The rest is lost to denitrification, volatization, chealation, etc.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Klause View PostNo one said it's a waste. I'm also not advocating the end of using nitrogen. I'm saying become more efficient with it. You're putting on about 140 lbs the plant will use about 48% of that. The rest is lost to denitrification, volatization, chealation, etc.
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment