• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

U.S. Slaps Duties On Canadian - Raising Trade Tensions

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    chuckdeau, Ontario and Quebec are both have not provinces and do not contribute more to the federal government than those same provinces receive from the federal government. Pay attention to the news, will ya !

    Comment


      #17
      The $300,000,000.00 Trudeau just recently gave BBDb wasn't to help the company or the workers, it was to aid the Liberal Party in getting MP's re-elected in Quebec.
      Using money from the Have Provinces, and of course,,,,don't forget added debt.
      Added debt,,,,just to get re-elected!

      Comment


        #18
        When I have more time we can over the equalization system and federal revenues and transfers. Harvest is waiting.

        But in the mean time it is pretty clear that you are happy if jobs are lost in Quebec and transferred to the US, Europe, Brazil, or China.

        Cheering on duties against your own countries manufacturing sector and cheering on potential job losses because you don't like the current government or prime minster is absolutely ****ing stupid and very short term thinking and partisan bullshit.

        And at the same time you are receiving farm subsidies from the Federal and Provincial government.

        Wholly shit man shake your head!

        Comment


          #19
          cc, "cheering on potential job losses"

          Where in my posts did I state that?

          liberals always like to put words in other people's mouths. same as calling them deniers or nazis.

          Comment


            #20
            Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
            When I have more time we can over the equalization system and federal revenues and transfers. Harvest is waiting.

            But in the mean time it is pretty clear that you are happy if jobs are lost in Quebec and transferred to the US, Europe, Brazil, or China.

            Cheering on duties against your own countries manufacturing sector and cheering on potential job losses because you don't like the current government or prime minster is absolutely ****ing stupid and very short term thinking and partisan bullshit.

            And at the same time you are receiving farm subsidies from the Federal and Provincial government.

            Wholly shit man shake your head!

            What farm subsidy am I receiving from the federal government?

            Comment


              #21
              Originally posted by sumdumguy View Post
              What farm subsidy am I receiving from the federal government?
              Agriinvest, Agristability, 1/2 crop insurance premiums. Farm fuel tax breaks, You may not use any of those program, but most farmers have or still do.

              Comment


                #22
                Originally posted by danny W1M View Post
                The $300,000,000.00 Trudeau just recently gave BBDb wasn't to help the company or the workers, it was to aid the Liberal Party in getting MP's re-elected in Quebec.
                Using money from the Have Provinces, and of course,,,,don't forget added debt.
                Added debt,,,,just to get re-elected!
                What of the $350,000,000.00 the Harper Government spent in 2008? Not saying it's right or wrong but to imply this is a Liberal policy created by Trudeau is false - Bombardier is a long running saga of state sponsorship.

                Comment


                  #23
                  Absolutely right Danny. Taking our money to buy votes. We deal with a company out of Quebec and there sales rep even admits that alot of their infrastructure is funded by us. New bridges and highway off ramps paid for by transfer payments. We can't get our shitty highways fixed because the money to do so goes there. Don't matter which party they all gotta suck up to them. Only way to end it is to separate. Sad

                  Comment


                    #24
                    Why do we have to leave the Dominion.....give them what they were asking for in the past....amputate the "Cancer".....and those parts that want to stay should be given the choice....if the Separatists don't like that....let them "sort it out" within their own borders.

                    Comment


                      #25
                      Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
                      Agriinvest, Agristability, 1/2 crop insurance premiums. Farm fuel tax breaks, You may not use any of those program, but most farmers have or still do.
                      Crop Insurance is a myth.

                      Look at how much of the SCIC money is being diverted to GRF. We pay 100% of our own premiums, plus pay into the provincial coffers. Fancy accounting, but it is not subsidized.


                      Fuel isn't a subsidy. Fuel taxes are used to maintain roads and bridges. Farmers, Fishers, Loggers, boats… planes all pay less taxes because the fuel IS NOT USED ON A F***ING ROAD.


                      I'd honestly think you'd be smarter than that.


                      As far as AgriInvest/AgriStab… yeah ok, they might be a "subsidy". Wouldn't know, not in them, never was, never will be.

                      Comment


                        #26
                        Originally posted by Klause View Post
                        Fuel isn't a subsidy. Fuel taxes are used to maintain roads and bridges. Farmers, Fishers, Loggers, boats… planes all pay less taxes because the fuel IS NOT USED ON A F***ING ROAD.
                        Since when? I along with most other farmers own a farm truck, used dyed fuel and drive on the highways. Heck many of the farm wives haul their kids around the country to hockey and horse events on farm fuel.

                        Comment


                          #27
                          Well said Klause 👍👍

                          Comment


                            #28
                            Originally posted by grassfarmer View Post
                            Since when? I along with most other farmers own a farm truck, used dyed fuel and drive on the highways. Heck many of the farm wives haul their kids around the country to hockey and horse events on farm fuel.
                            Well you are special… we knew that.

                            Sask doesn't have dyed gas anymore… and what you're doing is actually breaking the law. Dyed fuel is for FARM USE ONLY.

                            By the way, grid roads are maintained through your RM property taxes… not fuel taxes, so you're not being "subsidized" driving down grid roads to your fields… a different story if you're vacationing with your pickup and burning dyed…. again, illegal. So is going to work and burning dyed fuel.


                            Manitoba cops used to stop pickups and cars and dip the tanks… It was a pretty hefty fine if you were running dyed when you shouldn't have been.

                            Comment


                              #29
                              Originally posted by grassfarmer View Post
                              Since when? I along with most other farmers own a farm truck, used dyed fuel and drive on the highways. Heck many of the farm wives haul their kids around the country to hockey and horse events on farm fuel.
                              Also, when I look at my fuel usage… we burnt a total of 27,900 litres of fuel this year. 3150 was gas. 472 was through card lock (farm use). Rest was all bought at a gas station like any consumer. That means we burnt over 24,000 litres of diesel on the farm… in the field… makes the gas you burn on the road extremely marginal, many farms have a way larger ratio than that, and we'll probably burn another 8000 or more to finish the year in the field.

                              And before you start… our semi is commercially apportioned so there's no dyed fuel to haul grain to the elevator either…. even though it's 90% grid roads to the elevator.

                              Again, NOT A SUBSIDY.

                              Comment


                                #30
                                Doesn't anyone remember the 20% dyed fuel usage that is subject to excise tax in the last Sask budget.

                                Edit: the level of government and specific tax might be wrong in the statement above....but something changed somewhere to account for road use of dyed diesel and elimination of "farm" gas tax exceptions.
                                Last edited by farmaholic; Sep 27, 2017, 20:11.

                                Comment

                                • Reply to this Thread
                                • Return to Topic List
                                Working...