I too think we need to be very careful when it comes to equalization.... wasn't Saskscratchandwin on the receiving end for decades as well, albeit probably not as much in total value. I "assume" it has something to do with each province's GDP and it's population..... an absolute wild assed guess on my part, probably alot more complicated than that.
Equalization=National Welfare. How do you ever determine that each Canadian enjoys the same "basic" standard of living as each other.... regional cost differences can vary. How do you measure benefits and detriments of living in certain areas? Housing.... million dollar houses in BC versus 500K houses in Sask.... does that mean BC residents "need" more money and that might have to be accounted for in equalization formulas.... pick a living requirement and apply some convoluted formula to it to determine if your area qualifies for "National Welfare"?
Equalization=National Welfare. How do you ever determine that each Canadian enjoys the same "basic" standard of living as each other.... regional cost differences can vary. How do you measure benefits and detriments of living in certain areas? Housing.... million dollar houses in BC versus 500K houses in Sask.... does that mean BC residents "need" more money and that might have to be accounted for in equalization formulas.... pick a living requirement and apply some convoluted formula to it to determine if your area qualifies for "National Welfare"?
Comment