Interesting tidbit

[Klause]

Holy forage give your head a shake.



Trains have to pull over and stop sometimes for hours waiting for another train to pass.


You could tripple the amount of freight on rail with teinned tracks


Down there they are building tunnels under the Rocky mountains to make traveling safer and faster. Here we shut the Cocahalla down every time it snows.


Our oil industry struggles because we can't get it to market.
Our grain industry struggles because we can't get it to market.


We keep telling about billions in infrastructure but nothing comes of it... a patch on a highest err a water treatment upgrade there... Doesnt do anything for the economy.


Why not build a high speed passenger train connecting large cities. Make it electric (green transportation).

Twin the main rail beds.


Dredge the south sask river... You could connect it to Port of Churchill. Imagine how cheap that would move grain. It was actually studied in the 30s... And found to be feasible.

[bucket]

Been saying this for years....part of the open market was to ensure all market players....farmers railways graincos .....do their part....


All I see is farmers adding thousands of tonnes of on farm storage....

You are right the railways will stop split the train and wait for 6 hours to let others pass...

Just twinning the lines from Calgary to thunder bay would improve logistics...


High speed rail....how else will you entice immigrants to come here....I know if I could hop a train to different places I would for a brief holiday....

[furrowtickler]

Heard this one ....
cut the transfer payments to Quebec
Use that money to help twin rail from western Alberta to ports in Vancouver and Rupert.
Build the oil pipeline to the BC coast , China / Japan would buy every drop .
Get our resources to markets that want , need and will pay for it .

[SASKFARMER3]

Thats what we need furrow. Enough of being held captive in our own country.

The west would be wealthy and eventually the East would crumble.

[foragefarmer]

Klaus tell me how twinning rail lines (which I agree with as it would move more product) would put more money in my pocket, freight rates wouldn't go down, unless your suggesting they bring back the crow rate.This would be a government subsidy, I thought your a Libertarian.

More grain movement doesn't mean higher returns to farmer, there is a glut of wheat in the world market and every country can grow it. The Black Sea blows out their product every year which drops the world market price every year. That's the underlying factor! Have you not notice Ukraine and Russia's proximity to the Black Sea?

Your pipe dream about dredging the Sk River to Churchill and using it as a port has been smoke way to many times. Not economical many have tried and have failed. importers done't want to use it, bottom line. Why you would mention a study that was conducted in the 1930s stating Churchill is feasible, that's 80 years ago many things have changed.

[Klause]

Klaus tell me how twinning rail lines (which I agree with as it would move more product) would put more money in my pocket, freight rates wouldn't go down, unless your suggesting they bring back the crow rate.This would be a government subsidy, I thought your a Libertarian.

More grain movement doesn't mean higher returns to farmer, there is a glut of wheat in the world market and every country can grow it. The Black Sea blows out their product every year which drops the world market price every year. That's the underlying factor! Have you not notice Ukraine and Russia's proximity to the Black Sea?

Your pipe dream about dredging the Sk River to Churchill and using it as a port has been smoke way to many times. Not economical many have tried and have failed. importers done't want to use it, bottom line. Why you would mention a study that was conducted in the 1930s stating Churchill is feasible, that's 80 years ago many things have changed.

Yup you're right. Let's sit on our ass and watch as we turn into a third world country. I like my standard of living. Don't you? Unless we keep up with our competition our standard of living will drop significantly

[danny W1M]

All these ideas to increase efficiencies, have less to do with the spending/finance that would be needed for these projects, and way more to do with the regulation, enviroNazis, and particularly the Canadian courts.

Dredging the S.Sask is a great idea, but it's a pipe dream because enviroNazis and the left leaning Supreme court would never approve it. Would there ever be a federal government that would use "not withstanding" to push a project through. Where would our international standing be? with other trading partners? U.N.? et al?

Don't think there won't be enviro challenges to twinning rail lines either. Courts make law now days.

Would doubling track on a path to the Mississippi be a more realistic possibility? How far north are grain barges loaded? Minneapolis?


Foragey/grasseyfarmer

Moving grain on waterways is not all that! Here's a report done regarding moving grain on the Missouri to get it to the Mississippi River for shipping.

[URL="https://iatp.org/files/Past_and_Future_Grain_Traffic_on_the_Missouri_.pdf "]https://iatp.org/files/Past_and_Future_Grain_Traffic_on_the_Missouri_.pdf[/URL]

Here are the conclusions;

• Commercial barge traffic has been declining on the Missouri River since 1977.
• Wheat shipments, over one-third of all commercial traffic on the Missouri River in
1979, have almost disappeared.
• The reasons for these dramatic declines in Missouri River barge traffic are reduced
wheat production, a highly competitive railroad system, high Missouri River barge
costs, and rapidly growing local and domestic markets.
• There is little reason to believe that these trends will be reversed on a long-term basis.
• The public cost of providing navigation on the Missouri River exceeds the benefits to
shippers.
• An open public debate is needed to evaluate alternative navigation investment
strategies on the Missouri River and other low-volume rivers. Farmers like Steve
Swanson need to be involved in these debates.

[Klause]

I wonder where Chuck and grassy stand on building a high speed passenger train network....


Connect cities with more than 200,000 people... You could take how many cars off the road.


Would do a lot more for the environment than what a carbon tax would do.

The US got w lot of use out of the barge system during the time they spent as a major grain exporter... Today they have enough mouths to feed that exporting isn't as important anymore.

Canada is very different... Huge breadbasket tiny population.

[samhill]

Railways

Twinning lines would make passenger cargo feasible, airlines would lose a lot of traffic, possibly not survive in domestic passenger competition. Dredging to Churchill or even rail to Churchill would remove too much grain freight to Ontario and Quebec, Richardsons, Cargill et al would not have control.
Tech advances likely make it feasible now compared to old feasibility studies but not gonna happen. Stepping on somebody's toes.

[foragefarmer]

For all those commenting on the dredging of the Sk River to Churchill, if it could make shipping more efficient and cost effective, why hasn't Potash Corp not looked into it?

[Klause]

For all those commenting on the dredging of the Sk River to Churchill, if it could make shipping more efficient and cost effective, why hasn't Potash Corp not looked into it?

Because they are a potash mine ? That's the same as asking why didn't pics build their own railway

[Integrity_Farmer]

I wonder where Chuck and grassy stand on building a high speed passenger train network....


Connect cities with more than 200,000 people... You could take how many cars off the road.


Would do a lot more for the environment than what a carbon tax would do.

The US got w lot of use out of the barge system during the time they spent as a major grain exporter... Today they have enough mouths to feed that exporting isn't as important anymore.

Canada is very different... Huge breadbasket tiny population.

Right on Klaus, a carbon tax is a tax and has no measurable benefit. I suppose the carbon tax plan was to invest the money from the tax in environmental programs. With Morneau the tax will no doubt go to his friends and his companies of course. We need concrete action on the environment. A railway system to serve small communities would do more for the environment and the economy. Rail passenger service absolutely

Trucks hauling grain hundreds of miles before it goes by train is insanity. A carbon tax will pass those trucking costs onto the farmer. Rail transportation is known to be 10 times more energy efficient than truck. Why are the railways and highways treated differently?

Grain transportation needs to be organized. The Canadian Wheat Board also did a great deal for the environment and the efficient movement of grain.

Grain production the the prairies has never been viable without a Canadian Wheat Board. With $4.20 1RS wheat low protein wheat farmers need a Canadian Wheat Board. Malt barley and durum used to be go to crops for many farmers and that was because of the Canadian Wheat Board.

Producer car loaders also had a market for their wheat with the CWB, no wonder the car loading sites are being shut down. The rail line to the port of Churchill was financially viable because of the Canadian Wheat Board.

Finally since the CWB was eliminated farmers have lost billions in revenue.