Most corporate workplaces have policies backing up employees for issues like sexual harassment. People are more likely to run into it with neighbours and acquaintances than at work, unless they’re working for a small company, or in this field, small farmer. I will agree with your friends that workplace sexual harassment is not a huge issue. It is few and far between and usually committed by those corner office types that feel they’re untouchable, yes.
But are you grouping everything together when you call it a movement? That there doesn’t need to be movement and the movement does more segregation and harm than good. What movement are you talking about? A wide spread goal for equal pay and equal opportunity? Or the rise in women’s events? Because my medical examples are to support the importance and desire of women’s only events.
If you don’t feel that the increase in popularity of these events is part of your term “movement†then feel free to ignore that post. But if it is included as an example of further segregation of women from men, then it stands. Everyone needs a place to feel comfortable and that should not fall under the term segregation.
But are you grouping everything together when you call it a movement? That there doesn’t need to be movement and the movement does more segregation and harm than good. What movement are you talking about? A wide spread goal for equal pay and equal opportunity? Or the rise in women’s events? Because my medical examples are to support the importance and desire of women’s only events.
If you don’t feel that the increase in popularity of these events is part of your term “movement†then feel free to ignore that post. But if it is included as an example of further segregation of women from men, then it stands. Everyone needs a place to feel comfortable and that should not fall under the term segregation.
Comment