I can't believe I am typing this, but I agree with ChuckChuck on this issue:
I've asked my fellow producers this question before, since you disapprove of the price the free market offers when there is over supply, what mechanism do you propose to use to ration supply to keep it close to demand? The patent answer, that the government should pay us more, or the end user should be forced to pay us more because there is only 2 cents worth of Oats in a box of Cheerios, will result in even greater production, and even greater surpluses, requiring even greater subsidies, completely distorting the price signal which was trying to tell us to throttle back on production. The only thing that might work is productions quota's, but I can only imaging the screaming that us farmers would do if government told us what to grow and when, not to mention that our competition would happily fill the gap left by our lower production and laugh at us all the way to the bank.
It may very well be that Canadian agriculture will be no different than manufacturing, and we are unable to compete when we have high taxes, high regulations, high wages, and a hostile climate. Should government be supporting every money losing manufacturer ( like they do the quebec favorite), and if not, why are farmers any different?
We all sound the same, government is the problem don't tax me, don't tell me what to do, let the free market function. Until the free market tells us that it doesn't want our product at the price we like, then suddenly we demand that government step in and fix the obviously broken free market for us.
Personally, I believe sink or swim should be the policy for all businesses, keep the government out of it completely, that includes crop insurance, trade tariffs, subsidies, financing, preferential tax treatment, etc. So long as the playing field is level across the country, we will survive, the surpluses coming from these programs just gets bid into land costs anyways.
Originally posted by chuckChuck
View Post
It may very well be that Canadian agriculture will be no different than manufacturing, and we are unable to compete when we have high taxes, high regulations, high wages, and a hostile climate. Should government be supporting every money losing manufacturer ( like they do the quebec favorite), and if not, why are farmers any different?
We all sound the same, government is the problem don't tax me, don't tell me what to do, let the free market function. Until the free market tells us that it doesn't want our product at the price we like, then suddenly we demand that government step in and fix the obviously broken free market for us.
Personally, I believe sink or swim should be the policy for all businesses, keep the government out of it completely, that includes crop insurance, trade tariffs, subsidies, financing, preferential tax treatment, etc. So long as the playing field is level across the country, we will survive, the surpluses coming from these programs just gets bid into land costs anyways.
Comment