• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

If Saskatchewan was a country it would be a world leader

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Gee, i wonder how the countries of Europe are doing in their emissions this year?

    [URL="http://aqicn.org/map/europe/#@g/47.2062/17.4902/5z"]http://aqicn.org/map/europe/#@g/47.2062/17.4902/5z[/URL]

    Cough, cough , choke, gasp!!!

    Comment


      #17
      You can name a country dumb****istan and if its taxes are the lowest and there's zero threat of govt stealing from private industry, ie. Security .... it will be the absolute power house of the world. It doesn't even need citizens. All it needs is enough govt to stop theft. And really what good is govt when all it does is steal from the people. A 1 man show is all that's required. Corporate rights would be a novel idea, that's not seen in Canada. Bureaucrats need to die.
      Last edited by macdon02; Dec 8, 2017, 23:26.

      Comment


        #18
        Metaphorically speaking of course.....

        Comment


          #19
          This graph clearly shows that Haiti and Afghanistan are climate leaders.
          Easy to see what we're doing wrong and what we are clearly doing to follow their example.

          Comment


            #20
            I'd just bet that North Dakota is right up there with Saskatchewan and a few other resource rich; but relatively lightly populated places on earth.

            So the rest of the world might like to turn their lights off.

            Talk about cutting off noses to spite your face.

            Comment


              #21
              As if anyone in Sask ever had a plan for efficiency and energy usage.

              Well maybe a couple times digging ourselves out of deep holes and more lately that exponential growth one that collapsed about 3 years ago.

              And the ongoing plan for a handful of managers farming it all with next to no labor force. And continuing to ship out resources; and paving and road building over the richest prairie soils; whilst paying the freight both ways.

              When will grass et al recognize that its too far to walk; too heavy to personally carry; and there is nothing that can be done (in short term at least) about the albatrosses that we are attached too.

              It is time for a made in Sask destiny plan. The ones forced upon ourselves worked better for others than the Sask residents who have had to be "resilient" to survive thus far. Give us a break for once!!!!

              Comment


                #22
                The person that made that graph should go back to kindergarten and learn how to add. Last time I checked Sask is part of Canada, so there is no way Sask can be higher that Canada. Pretty sure chemical alley in Ontario would have all of sask beat

                Comment


                  #23
                  Originally posted by TASFarms View Post
                  The person that made that graph should go back to kindergarten and learn how to add. Last time I checked Sask is part of Canada, so there is no way Sask can be higher that Canada. Pretty sure chemical alley in Ontario would have all of sask beat
                  ...per capita?

                  Comment


                    #24
                    Qualman is a writer for NFU. Suck the old ....... blah blah blah

                    Comment


                      #25
                      Originally posted by farmaholic View Post
                      ...per capita?
                      Sure per capita. His main ghg is carbon. Is nitrogen fertilizer a ghg? Doesn't a well fertilized crop sequester more carbon than than an unfertilized crop. Not much carbon used to make nitrogen fertilizer. To get to the 60tonnes of carbon produced per year per person, wouldn't everything that is produced in sask have to be consumed in sask

                      Comment


                        #26
                        Originally posted by TASFarms View Post
                        Sure per capita. His main ghg is carbon. Is nitrogen fertilizer a ghg? Doesn't a well fertilized crop sequester more carbon than than an unfertilized crop. Not much carbon used to make nitrogen fertilizer. To get to the 60tonnes of carbon produced per year per person, wouldn't everything that is produced in sask have to be consumed in sask
                        When words won't do.

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	Screen Shot 2017-12-09 at 10.56.48 AM.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	12.6 KB
ID:	766105

                        Comment

                        • Reply to this Thread
                        • Return to Topic List
                        Working...