question for grass farmer

[Guest]

I am just curious on this graph you posted on sask ? do you really believe this ? or do you truly not understand the complete picture ? do you really not understand how the trees and forest , crops ,and all things growing , etc . work to reduce carbon ??? or are you just trying to stir up shit ? this is one of the most blatant , one sided charts I have ever saw

[sk_wheatking]

It's hard to understand. The guy moved here from wherever and ******* and complains about how Canada does business. If this is such a shitty place to live why stay.

[LEP]

Did he move willingly or was he kicked out? Enquiring minds want to know.

[grassfarmer]

It's hard to understand. The guy moved here from wherever and ******* and complains about how Canada does business. If this is such a shitty place to live why stay.

I think you're confusing me with SF3 - indeed most of the posters on Agriville nowadays - constant griping about how everything is wrong with Canada.

[Guest]

I think you're confusing me with SF3 - indeed most of the posters on Agriville nowadays - constant griping about how everything is wrong with Canada.

For my part grass , it was indeed a serious question from me to you , nothing sinister , just trying to understand how anything of any value could be derived from that chart ? Or why someone would waste time making it Maybe i'm missing something ? Just trying to understand

[SASKFARMER3]

No parasite the problem is your attitude with Climate change and how the liberal party is so good for canada.

Im pointing out that nothing has changed and one Trudeau was enough.

Have a great day.


Its Friday and thats positive.

Also lots of Xmas parties.

[grassfarmer]

I am just curious on this graph you posted on sask ? do you really believe this ? or do you truly not understand the complete picture ? do you really not understand how the trees and forest , crops ,and all things growing , etc . work to reduce carbon ??? or are you just trying to stir up shit ? this is one of the most blatant , one sided charts I have ever saw

caseih - yes I believe it because I know the quality of Darrin's work and know he gets his facts straight before publishing something. It is quite clear what he was showing and it said it right at the bottom "Saskatchewan greenhouse gas emissions relative to selected nations" and up the side "GHG per person, per year etc".
It takes some explaining why SKs emissions in these terms are 4x those of Manitobans, why SK's per capita emissions have risen 65% between 1990 and 2015. Another interesting little snippet in his article was that applied N tonnage in SK has doubled since 2002. Sorry, my initial link to his article didn't work please go back and read it as it gives context to the graph. I've posted it again here for your convenience.
[URL="http://www.darrinqualman.com/saskatchewan-greenhouse-gas-emissions-climate-change-strategy/"]http://http://www.darrinqualman.com/saskatchewan-greenhouse-gas-emissions-climate-change-strategy/[/URL]

[Oliver88]

It's hard to understand. The guy moved here from wherever and ******* and complains about how Canada does business. If this is such a shitty place to live why stay.

Pretty much or maybe his goal is to remind everyone that Agriville has an ignore feature. 😂

[farming101]

Another interesting little snippet in his article was that applied N tonnage in SK has doubled since 2002. [/URL]

Some things to consider:

Sask Ag production tonnage up 230% from 2002 to 2017
World population up 1.248 billion since 2002
Which jurisdiction gets credited for the GHG's? The one that produces the product or the one that imports and consumes the product? I think I know the answer. The producer

Chinese GHG emissions (2013) 11,735.0071 Mt CO2e
Chinese best case 2030 12,200 - 13,700 Mt CO2e
Sask GHG emissions (2015) 75.0 Mt CO2e

I think we're in trouble

[farming101]

SK population growth 2005-2015 16.3%
SK GHG emission increase 2005-2015 7.9%