I am just curious on this graph you posted on sask ? do you really believe this ? or do you truly not understand the complete picture ? do you really not understand how the trees and forest , crops ,and all things growing , etc . work to reduce carbon ??? or are you just trying to stir up shit ? this is one of the most blatant , one sided charts I have ever saw
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
question for grass farmer
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
It's hard to understand. The guy moved here from wherever and ******* and complains about how Canada does business. If this is such a shitty place to live why stay.
-
Originally posted by sk_wheatking View PostIt's hard to understand. The guy moved here from wherever and ******* and complains about how Canada does business. If this is such a shitty place to live why stay.
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by grassfarmer View PostI think you're confusing me with SF3 - indeed most of the posters on Agriville nowadays - constant griping about how everything is wrong with Canada.
Comment
-
Originally posted by caseih View PostI am just curious on this graph you posted on sask ? do you really believe this ? or do you truly not understand the complete picture ? do you really not understand how the trees and forest , crops ,and all things growing , etc . work to reduce carbon ??? or are you just trying to stir up shit ? this is one of the most blatant , one sided charts I have ever saw
It takes some explaining why SKs emissions in these terms are 4x those of Manitobans, why SK's per capita emissions have risen 65% between 1990 and 2015. Another interesting little snippet in his article was that applied N tonnage in SK has doubled since 2002. Sorry, my initial link to his article didn't work please go back and read it as it gives context to the graph. I've posted it again here for your convenience.
[URL="http://www.darrinqualman.com/saskatchewan-greenhouse-gas-emissions-climate-change-strategy/"]http://http://www.darrinqualman.com/saskatchewan-greenhouse-gas-emissions-climate-change-strategy/[/URL]
Comment
-
Originally posted by sk_wheatking View PostIt's hard to understand. The guy moved here from wherever and ******* and complains about how Canada does business. If this is such a shitty place to live why stay.
Comment
-
Originally posted by grassfarmer View PostAnother interesting little snippet in his article was that applied N tonnage in SK has doubled since 2002. [/URL]
Sask Ag production tonnage up 230% from 2002 to 2017
World population up 1.248 billion since 2002
Which jurisdiction gets credited for the GHG's? The one that produces the product or the one that imports and consumes the product? I think I know the answer. The producer
Chinese GHG emissions (2013) 11,735.0071 Mt CO2e
Chinese best case 2030 12,200 - 13,700 Mt CO2e
Sask GHG emissions (2015) 75.0 Mt CO2e
I think we're in trouble
Comment
-
-
Grass I have to agree a tiny bit about everyine complaining about politicians and policies constantly. It gets old. Ritz Did lots of questionable stuff so is trudeau. These politicians we elect behave in a way that the majority of voters dictate. It is scary to me that the majority in this country seems to want to tax wealth creators into extinction. The standard of living we have here in Canada is possible because of wealth creators. Not history professors, not artists, not politicions and certainly not environmental lobbyists.
Comment
-
Grass it’s painfully obvious that yourself and a few others on here simply despise modern grain farms . Also there is a resentment in a lot of the posts to those who do well grain farming .
That’s where a lot of the b/S is directed at.
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment