Perfecho, sad to hear you consider coming on here wallowing, always good to hear from you. By March of 2020 the NDP project the debt will $71 billion or $16473 per person. Ontario the most indebted non sovereign government in the world at present has $21841 of reported debt per person. So in less than 5 years the Alberta NDP will have accumulated roughly 3/4's as much debt per person as Ontario has over its lifetime. Quite an accomplishment(not)! As for how we got in this mess, very simple, using royalties to fund everyday expenses of government. If Albertan's had been willing and in my opinion smart enough to have implemented a sales tax 20 years ago and did a better job of managing spending this problem wouldn't exist today. Having said that the NDP have certainly made a bad situation far worse.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Alberta's Financial Abyss . . . .
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
Originally posted by caseih View PostThey would of had lots of reserves if quebec wouldnt have taken it all , ffs
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hamloc View PostPerfecho, sad to hear you consider coming on here wallowing, always good to hear from you. By March of 2020 the NDP project the debt will $71 billion or $16473 per person. Ontario the most indebted non sovereign government in the world at present has $21841 of reported debt per person. So in less than 5 years the Alberta NDP will have accumulated roughly 3/4's as much debt per person as Ontario has over its lifetime. Quite an accomplishment(not)! As for how we got in this mess, very simple, using royalties to fund everyday expenses of government. If Albertan's had been willing and in my opinion smart enough to have implemented a sales tax 20 years ago and did a better job of managing spending this problem wouldn't exist today. Having said that the NDP have certainly made a bad situation far worse.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chuckChuck View PostCritics Slam Alberta's New Royalty Review as Policy Disaster
https://thetyee.ca/News/2016/02/02/Alberta-Royalty-Review-Disaster/
"In another submission, the economist Mark Anielski reported how the province would have benefited if it had kept Lougheed's approach to a robust and healthy royalty regime.
"Had Alberta maintained a 30 per cent royalty rate on the share of the value of the oil and gas produced between 1971 to 2014, Albertans would have generated $471.4 billion in oil and gas royalties. Had 50 per cent of these royalties been invested in the Alberta Heritage Savings and Trust Fund with annual average return of five per cent per annum we would now have an investment account worth over $481 billion."
The current savings fund holds less than $20 billion." [Tyee]
Alberta's resources have been mismanaged for decades after Lougheed.
Classic left wing non think here. Reality is that Alberta would have produced much less volume during this period had royalties been kept at 30% because oil sands are relatively expensive to produce. By reducing royalties, oil sands became viable and people went to work and tax revenue followed. Then there is the quebec factor as others have pointed out. The Klein years were the best time in Alberta history. Thank you Ralph.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ajl View PostClassic left wing non think here. Reality is that Alberta would have produced much less volume during this period had royalties been kept at 30% because oil sands are relatively expensive to produce. By reducing royalties, oil sands became viable and people went to work and tax revenue followed. Then there is the quebec factor as others have pointed out. The Klein years were the best time in Alberta history. Thank you Ralph.
IMHO its because of the likes of GDR ,LEP ,Hamloc that we are in this mess if you as good supporters of the cons would have been watching what was going on and held them accountable instead of making excuses for them ,we had one of the most arrogant cons Ken Kowalski , then Steve west ,for his boondoggle of elect deregulation,I could go on forever but I fail to see how the NDs could possibly ****up worse than those assholes did
Comment
-
Well, back again so soon...;-)
The wallowing refers to some bullying styles that if you don't agree or are in the right party, you are totally stupid...not really my type of conversation, however, Hammy, do find yours at least thought out and not just because of party lines. (Like Harper's budgetary 5.8 billion deficit of 2008-9...totally the fault of the recession, whoever the oil price fall totally Notely's fault...;-0 )
Yes , agreed on the accomplishments, however, had Prentice gotten in, don't think it would be very much different. And had the WR....think we would be little debt, but everyone in the province would be out of work. Agree about the "bad situation made worse", but do believe the ground work was laid...a later comment on oil sands...mismanagement again.....and that is why the wages and cost of business got to be a burden for those outside the oil patch. I remember Ralph's tax concession , another one, to them when his chief of staff, Peter Elzinga, became a lobbyist for Suncor.....racked with nepotism and corruption, but it was OK, because it was Ralph. (And I reiterate, I loved him too...at the beginning, but...) And I will vote for the first party, regardless of who, would bring in a sales tax...one of the fairest types of tax.
And that is why I dislike political parties....its all in or all out...and that doesn't work for me. There is good and bad in all, people and parties...
Anyways, have a great Christmas....I still live where I want to and am able to call life here a blessing...
Merry Christmas!
Comment
-
Don't know why electrical deregulation is referred to as boondoggle. Granted there were hiccups along the way, but it is the main reason that power prices have been under 2 cents wholesale in AB recently. Something the Dippers are desperately trying to change as their 'green' energy is no near competitive. Deregulation brought a lot of power from cogeneration and other like technologies on line. There was a lot of vested interests that were rocked in the process and understandably they were not happy, but it has in general been a boon to the average consumer.
Comment
-
Ahh, but we don't pay 2 cents....my actual power is 1/3 of my bill, the rest goes to carriers and providers, of which we, the province use to own.....and the power bill I just paid today, was closer to 4 cents for power alone (Epcor) and times 3 to get my actual power bill.
Did you not find it strange that Jim Dining was in the center of power deregulation government and then got to be Executive VP of TransAlta at pretty decent salary.....then trodden in on a white horse to replace Klein, but when that battle was lost, he had no commitment to Alberta...only wanted to be it's leader...much like Prentice. (As a side note, he has been a chair of Alberta's Clean Power Coalition)
So, could we have had continued with us being the share holders of a pretty dam good corp supplying power....but I remember my cheque for my share.....wasn't more than $200....which was used up on my first power bill.....
Comment
-
Originally posted by perfecho View PostAhh, but we don't pay 2 cents....my actual power is 1/3 of my bill, the rest goes to carriers and providers, of which we, the province use to own.....and the power bill I just paid today, was closer to 4 cents for power alone (Epcor) and times 3 to get my actual power bill.
Did you not find it strange that Jim Dining was in the center of power deregulation government and then got to be Executive VP of TransAlta at pretty decent salary.....then trodden in on a white horse to replace Klein, but when that battle was lost, he had no commitment to Alberta...only wanted to be it's leader...much like Prentice. (As a side note, he has been a chair of Alberta's Clean Power Coalition)
So, could we have had continued with us being the share holders of a pretty dam good corp supplying power....but I remember my cheque for my share.....wasn't more than $200....which was used up on my first power bill.....
Comment
-
My take is from the outside looking in, as I live in Saskatchewan. I don't doubt that the PC's did many things wrong and needed a house cleaning.
However, from what I have seen from Notley , she is very idealogical and arrogant. When faced with a revenue shortfall, I think government needs to try and find ways to curtail spending and, or find new revenue.
NOT ANNOUNCE THAT THEY ARE SIMPLY RUNNING A DEFICIT OF XX BILLION UNTIL THE PROJECTED PRICE OF OIL RETURNS AND ALL IS FINE AGAIN. Not saying there wouldn't be a deficit, but definitely not of the gargantuan proportions you are seeing. That is what I blame the Notley government for.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ajl View PostThe deregulated portion of the bill is the generation side which has been declining. There are power pool flow through contracts in existence. Power pool pricing has been frequently lower than 0.02 in the past 5 years. The distribution portion of the power bill has always been and continues to be highly regulated partly because of natural monopoly reasons. That portion is rising and will continue to rise due to bureaucratic incompetence. Building wires to wind farms is one reason that is rising.
Trans Alta was sold to utilicorp of Missouri then to some Irish co and nowepcor for energy some other co for billing power sold in huge blocks as to eliminate competition, and the saga goes on,a serious cluster duck.
And I liked Ralph to but him and his gov left a lot to be desired,rember the Ralph bucks. As for transmission lines for wind farms.? but transmission to fort mac to export power to USA is a reality.and again with a profit guaranteed by gov. I could ramble on but you won't listen any so why bother if you won't get your nose out of the con party ass.
Comment
-
Those massive power lines were approved in 2012....and many still think it was to take power to the border for the gain of the power corps....and we get to pay.....but, I will admit, I really don't know.
LEP, this massive Alberta machine was out of control before hand....the ND's just kept it rolling and added their part...but it did keep people employed for the most part, yea...a lot of oil workers that made outlandish wages did lose theirs...and many in Calgary...but a correction was needed, not wanted. Have relatives, who seem to be good workers that kept on going with their drilling jobs, albeit at a lower rate, but....
We have a building we rent out in Nisku...luckily they stayed and kept going, found a way to make it work, where as before you could just about hang your shingle anywhere and use bodies that didn't deserve the rate they got.....and still, it amazes me, there are still buildings going up, even though there are a number empty,
Not sure how you compete in a world that continues to borrow money and goes deeper and deeper into debt, but that now seems the norm. Years ago, I thought this would all go to crap, terribly...and yet, somehow it just keeps going.
Anyways, been a slice....obviously some are on holidays so I got off lightly, but its time for my favorite service of the year.
Have a Wonderful Christmas, and wishing we all find what makes us happy in the New Year.
Comment
-
Originally posted by perfecho View PostThose massive power lines were approved in 2012....and many still think it was to take power to the border for the gain of the power corps....and we get to pay.....but, I will admit, I really don't know.
Comment
-
Originally posted by grassfarmer View PostRemember the lie that the power lines were needed to prevent power outages in a growing Calgary? Then Joe Anglin went into the schematics and pointed out that there was no way it was going into Calgary from Langdon as the wire shown in their plans could hardly carry any power. Caught out in another lie - as Joe used to say - the typical PC MLA was dumber than your average monkey.
As for the privatization of utilities, in theory it seems foolish but private industry is way more efficient at running any business. Partly because of bureaucracy that comes with government but also all suppliers & contractors have separate and higher prices for anything government.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GDR View PostAs for the privatization of utilities, in theory it seems foolish but private industry is way more efficient at running any business. Partly because of bureaucracy that comes with government but also all suppliers & contractors have separate and higher prices for anything government.
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment