• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Alberta's Financial Abyss . . . .

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Perfecho, sad to hear you consider coming on here wallowing, always good to hear from you. By March of 2020 the NDP project the debt will $71 billion or $16473 per person. Ontario the most indebted non sovereign government in the world at present has $21841 of reported debt per person. So in less than 5 years the Alberta NDP will have accumulated roughly 3/4's as much debt per person as Ontario has over its lifetime. Quite an accomplishment(not)! As for how we got in this mess, very simple, using royalties to fund everyday expenses of government. If Albertan's had been willing and in my opinion smart enough to have implemented a sales tax 20 years ago and did a better job of managing spending this problem wouldn't exist today. Having said that the NDP have certainly made a bad situation far worse.

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by caseih View Post
      They would of had lots of reserves if quebec wouldnt have taken it all , ffs
      Why blame Quebec for Alberta's mismanagement? LOL The equalization program is paid for with federal taxes collected in every province. Federal taxes still have to be paid regardless of how federal programs work. So Your argument is full of shit.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by Hamloc View Post
        Perfecho, sad to hear you consider coming on here wallowing, always good to hear from you. By March of 2020 the NDP project the debt will $71 billion or $16473 per person. Ontario the most indebted non sovereign government in the world at present has $21841 of reported debt per person. So in less than 5 years the Alberta NDP will have accumulated roughly 3/4's as much debt per person as Ontario has over its lifetime. Quite an accomplishment(not)! As for how we got in this mess, very simple, using royalties to fund everyday expenses of government. If Albertan's had been willing and in my opinion smart enough to have implemented a sales tax 20 years ago and did a better job of managing spending this problem wouldn't exist today. Having said that the NDP have certainly made a bad situation far worse.
        Sales tax would have been a good start. It will be interesting to see how Kenney cuts healthcare education and other programs if resource revenues don't improve. Alberta is in trouble and Kenney won't be able to do much about it.

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
          Critics Slam Alberta's New Royalty Review as Policy Disaster

          https://thetyee.ca/News/2016/02/02/Alberta-Royalty-Review-Disaster/

          "In another submission, the economist Mark Anielski reported how the province would have benefited if it had kept Lougheed's approach to a robust and healthy royalty regime.

          "Had Alberta maintained a 30 per cent royalty rate on the share of the value of the oil and gas produced between 1971 to 2014, Albertans would have generated $471.4 billion in oil and gas royalties. Had 50 per cent of these royalties been invested in the Alberta Heritage Savings and Trust Fund with annual average return of five per cent per annum we would now have an investment account worth over $481 billion."

          The current savings fund holds less than $20 billion." [Tyee]

          Alberta's resources have been mismanaged for decades after Lougheed.

          Classic left wing non think here. Reality is that Alberta would have produced much less volume during this period had royalties been kept at 30% because oil sands are relatively expensive to produce. By reducing royalties, oil sands became viable and people went to work and tax revenue followed. Then there is the quebec factor as others have pointed out. The Klein years were the best time in Alberta history. Thank you Ralph.

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by ajl View Post
            Classic left wing non think here. Reality is that Alberta would have produced much less volume during this period had royalties been kept at 30% because oil sands are relatively expensive to produce. By reducing royalties, oil sands became viable and people went to work and tax revenue followed. Then there is the quebec factor as others have pointed out. The Klein years were the best time in Alberta history. Thank you Ralph.
            The oil sands have a special deal so I don't believe we would have produced less and even if we did we would still have some cheap congenital crude to sell.
            IMHO its because of the likes of GDR ,LEP ,Hamloc that we are in this mess if you as good supporters of the cons would have been watching what was going on and held them accountable instead of making excuses for them ,we had one of the most arrogant cons Ken Kowalski , then Steve west ,for his boondoggle of elect deregulation,I could go on forever but I fail to see how the NDs could possibly ****up worse than those assholes did

            Comment


              #36
              Well, back again so soon...;-)
              The wallowing refers to some bullying styles that if you don't agree or are in the right party, you are totally stupid...not really my type of conversation, however, Hammy, do find yours at least thought out and not just because of party lines. (Like Harper's budgetary 5.8 billion deficit of 2008-9...totally the fault of the recession, whoever the oil price fall totally Notely's fault...;-0 )
              Yes , agreed on the accomplishments, however, had Prentice gotten in, don't think it would be very much different. And had the WR....think we would be little debt, but everyone in the province would be out of work. Agree about the "bad situation made worse", but do believe the ground work was laid...a later comment on oil sands...mismanagement again.....and that is why the wages and cost of business got to be a burden for those outside the oil patch. I remember Ralph's tax concession , another one, to them when his chief of staff, Peter Elzinga, became a lobbyist for Suncor.....racked with nepotism and corruption, but it was OK, because it was Ralph. (And I reiterate, I loved him too...at the beginning, but...) And I will vote for the first party, regardless of who, would bring in a sales tax...one of the fairest types of tax.
              And that is why I dislike political parties....its all in or all out...and that doesn't work for me. There is good and bad in all, people and parties...

              Anyways, have a great Christmas....I still live where I want to and am able to call life here a blessing...
              Merry Christmas!

              Comment


                #37
                Don't know why electrical deregulation is referred to as boondoggle. Granted there were hiccups along the way, but it is the main reason that power prices have been under 2 cents wholesale in AB recently. Something the Dippers are desperately trying to change as their 'green' energy is no near competitive. Deregulation brought a lot of power from cogeneration and other like technologies on line. There was a lot of vested interests that were rocked in the process and understandably they were not happy, but it has in general been a boon to the average consumer.

                Comment


                  #38
                  Ahh, but we don't pay 2 cents....my actual power is 1/3 of my bill, the rest goes to carriers and providers, of which we, the province use to own.....and the power bill I just paid today, was closer to 4 cents for power alone (Epcor) and times 3 to get my actual power bill.
                  Did you not find it strange that Jim Dining was in the center of power deregulation government and then got to be Executive VP of TransAlta at pretty decent salary.....then trodden in on a white horse to replace Klein, but when that battle was lost, he had no commitment to Alberta...only wanted to be it's leader...much like Prentice. (As a side note, he has been a chair of Alberta's Clean Power Coalition)
                  So, could we have had continued with us being the share holders of a pretty dam good corp supplying power....but I remember my cheque for my share.....wasn't more than $200....which was used up on my first power bill.....

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by perfecho View Post
                    Ahh, but we don't pay 2 cents....my actual power is 1/3 of my bill, the rest goes to carriers and providers, of which we, the province use to own.....and the power bill I just paid today, was closer to 4 cents for power alone (Epcor) and times 3 to get my actual power bill.
                    Did you not find it strange that Jim Dining was in the center of power deregulation government and then got to be Executive VP of TransAlta at pretty decent salary.....then trodden in on a white horse to replace Klein, but when that battle was lost, he had no commitment to Alberta...only wanted to be it's leader...much like Prentice. (As a side note, he has been a chair of Alberta's Clean Power Coalition)
                    So, could we have had continued with us being the share holders of a pretty dam good corp supplying power....but I remember my cheque for my share.....wasn't more than $200....which was used up on my first power bill.....
                    The deregulated portion of the bill is the generation side which has been declining. There are power pool flow through contracts in existence. Power pool pricing has been frequently lower than 0.02 in the past 5 years. The distribution portion of the power bill has always been and continues to be highly regulated partly because of natural monopoly reasons. That portion is rising and will continue to rise due to bureaucratic incompetence. Building wires to wind farms is one reason that is rising.

                    Comment


                      #40
                      My take is from the outside looking in, as I live in Saskatchewan. I don't doubt that the PC's did many things wrong and needed a house cleaning.

                      However, from what I have seen from Notley , she is very idealogical and arrogant. When faced with a revenue shortfall, I think government needs to try and find ways to curtail spending and, or find new revenue.

                      NOT ANNOUNCE THAT THEY ARE SIMPLY RUNNING A DEFICIT OF XX BILLION UNTIL THE PROJECTED PRICE OF OIL RETURNS AND ALL IS FINE AGAIN. Not saying there wouldn't be a deficit, but definitely not of the gargantuan proportions you are seeing. That is what I blame the Notley government for.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...