• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Alberta's Financial Abyss . . . .

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #37
    Don't know why electrical deregulation is referred to as boondoggle. Granted there were hiccups along the way, but it is the main reason that power prices have been under 2 cents wholesale in AB recently. Something the Dippers are desperately trying to change as their 'green' energy is no near competitive. Deregulation brought a lot of power from cogeneration and other like technologies on line. There was a lot of vested interests that were rocked in the process and understandably they were not happy, but it has in general been a boon to the average consumer.

    Comment


      #38
      Ahh, but we don't pay 2 cents....my actual power is 1/3 of my bill, the rest goes to carriers and providers, of which we, the province use to own.....and the power bill I just paid today, was closer to 4 cents for power alone (Epcor) and times 3 to get my actual power bill.
      Did you not find it strange that Jim Dining was in the center of power deregulation government and then got to be Executive VP of TransAlta at pretty decent salary.....then trodden in on a white horse to replace Klein, but when that battle was lost, he had no commitment to Alberta...only wanted to be it's leader...much like Prentice. (As a side note, he has been a chair of Alberta's Clean Power Coalition)
      So, could we have had continued with us being the share holders of a pretty dam good corp supplying power....but I remember my cheque for my share.....wasn't more than $200....which was used up on my first power bill.....

      Comment


        #39
        Originally posted by perfecho View Post
        Ahh, but we don't pay 2 cents....my actual power is 1/3 of my bill, the rest goes to carriers and providers, of which we, the province use to own.....and the power bill I just paid today, was closer to 4 cents for power alone (Epcor) and times 3 to get my actual power bill.
        Did you not find it strange that Jim Dining was in the center of power deregulation government and then got to be Executive VP of TransAlta at pretty decent salary.....then trodden in on a white horse to replace Klein, but when that battle was lost, he had no commitment to Alberta...only wanted to be it's leader...much like Prentice. (As a side note, he has been a chair of Alberta's Clean Power Coalition)
        So, could we have had continued with us being the share holders of a pretty dam good corp supplying power....but I remember my cheque for my share.....wasn't more than $200....which was used up on my first power bill.....
        The deregulated portion of the bill is the generation side which has been declining. There are power pool flow through contracts in existence. Power pool pricing has been frequently lower than 0.02 in the past 5 years. The distribution portion of the power bill has always been and continues to be highly regulated partly because of natural monopoly reasons. That portion is rising and will continue to rise due to bureaucratic incompetence. Building wires to wind farms is one reason that is rising.

        Comment


          #40
          My take is from the outside looking in, as I live in Saskatchewan. I don't doubt that the PC's did many things wrong and needed a house cleaning.

          However, from what I have seen from Notley , she is very idealogical and arrogant. When faced with a revenue shortfall, I think government needs to try and find ways to curtail spending and, or find new revenue.

          NOT ANNOUNCE THAT THEY ARE SIMPLY RUNNING A DEFICIT OF XX BILLION UNTIL THE PROJECTED PRICE OF OIL RETURNS AND ALL IS FINE AGAIN. Not saying there wouldn't be a deficit, but definitely not of the gargantuan proportions you are seeing. That is what I blame the Notley government for.

          Comment


            #41
            Originally posted by ajl View Post
            The deregulated portion of the bill is the generation side which has been declining. There are power pool flow through contracts in existence. Power pool pricing has been frequently lower than 0.02 in the past 5 years. The distribution portion of the power bill has always been and continues to be highly regulated partly because of natural monopoly reasons. That portion is rising and will continue to rise due to bureaucratic incompetence. Building wires to wind farms is one reason that is rising.
            We will have to agree to disagree I was a board member during the fiasco,steve west changed the rules more often than a hooker changes clients In the end some of the reas decided to go it without translate and I don't think they were prepared for that one. At the time the liberal party said it was going to cost Albertans 17 billion $ which I thought was high but now I am not sure if they didn't under estimate. Trans a;ta was guaranteed 12.5% return so they went to Brazil and lost billions so came back here to get a rate rider until they were in the black again. We were paying about 5.7 then with transmission and other costs except distribution, now its 5.9 + dist+trans+riders .
            Trans Alta was sold to utilicorp of Missouri then to some Irish co and nowepcor for energy some other co for billing power sold in huge blocks as to eliminate competition, and the saga goes on,a serious cluster duck.
            And I liked Ralph to but him and his gov left a lot to be desired,rember the Ralph bucks. As for transmission lines for wind farms.? but transmission to fort mac to export power to USA is a reality.and again with a profit guaranteed by gov. I could ramble on but you won't listen any so why bother if you won't get your nose out of the con party ass.

            Comment


              #42
              Those massive power lines were approved in 2012....and many still think it was to take power to the border for the gain of the power corps....and we get to pay.....but, I will admit, I really don't know.
              LEP, this massive Alberta machine was out of control before hand....the ND's just kept it rolling and added their part...but it did keep people employed for the most part, yea...a lot of oil workers that made outlandish wages did lose theirs...and many in Calgary...but a correction was needed, not wanted. Have relatives, who seem to be good workers that kept on going with their drilling jobs, albeit at a lower rate, but....
              We have a building we rent out in Nisku...luckily they stayed and kept going, found a way to make it work, where as before you could just about hang your shingle anywhere and use bodies that didn't deserve the rate they got.....and still, it amazes me, there are still buildings going up, even though there are a number empty,
              Not sure how you compete in a world that continues to borrow money and goes deeper and deeper into debt, but that now seems the norm. Years ago, I thought this would all go to crap, terribly...and yet, somehow it just keeps going.
              Anyways, been a slice....obviously some are on holidays so I got off lightly, but its time for my favorite service of the year.
              Have a Wonderful Christmas, and wishing we all find what makes us happy in the New Year.

              Comment


                #43
                Originally posted by perfecho View Post
                Those massive power lines were approved in 2012....and many still think it was to take power to the border for the gain of the power corps....and we get to pay.....but, I will admit, I really don't know.
                Remember the lie that the power lines were needed to prevent power outages in a growing Calgary? Then Joe Anglin went into the schematics and pointed out that there was no way it was going into Calgary from Langdon as the wire shown in their plans could hardly carry any power. Caught out in another lie - as Joe used to say - the typical PC MLA was dumber than your average monkey.

                Comment


                  #44
                  Originally posted by grassfarmer View Post
                  Remember the lie that the power lines were needed to prevent power outages in a growing Calgary? Then Joe Anglin went into the schematics and pointed out that there was no way it was going into Calgary from Langdon as the wire shown in their plans could hardly carry any power. Caught out in another lie - as Joe used to say - the typical PC MLA was dumber than your average monkey.
                  Original route was to go through our place and yes the bs they spewed about the next generation in calgary needs the power or they will be left cold and dark in winter. Was a huge attempt to guilt people into signing. Altalink was just one big lying machine.

                  As for the privatization of utilities, in theory it seems foolish but private industry is way more efficient at running any business. Partly because of bureaucracy that comes with government but also all suppliers & contractors have separate and higher prices for anything government.

                  Comment


                    #45
                    Originally posted by GDR View Post
                    As for the privatization of utilities, in theory it seems foolish but private industry is way more efficient at running any business. Partly because of bureaucracy that comes with government but also all suppliers & contractors have separate and higher prices for anything government.
                    Depends on how the environment the private industry operates in is set up and governed. Remember the genius system of the AESO auctions whereby the power generating companies had to bid in their offers to supply power over each time period by Dutch auction. So as an example a hydro company might offer in 30% of the requirement at $0 per megawatt hour because they couldn't store the power (this actually happened on occasion) Then the coal generated operators would offer 40% of the requirement at $10, then some other generator would offer in 25% of the requirement at $50 leaving only 5% of the supply to fill - which could be done by say nuclear generation - at $90 megawatt hour. So any sensible person would add these up and average the costs out over the total supply (100%) and that would be the cost the consumer would pay - but not in Alberta - they turned around and paid all the generators the $90 rate for all their production - even the guys that offered power at zero cost! You couldn't make this stuff up it is so crazy - even the mafia wouldn't be as bold as to try this kind of extortion but it was all approved and allowed to happen on the PC's watch. This is why Alberta had some of the most expensive electricity in North America - straight into the pockets of Enmax and Altalink and their like - because their directors or spouses were often high up members of the PC party.

                    Comment


                      #46
                      Originally posted by grassfarmer View Post
                      Depends on how the environment the private industry operates in is set up and governed. Remember the genius system of the AESO auctions whereby the power generating companies had to bid in their offers to supply power over each time period by Dutch auction. So as an example a hydro company might offer in 30% of the requirement at $0 per megawatt hour because they couldn't store the power (this actually happened on occasion) Then the coal generated operators would offer 40% of the requirement at $10, then some other generator would offer in 25% of the requirement at $50 leaving only 5% of the supply to fill - which could be done by say nuclear generation - at $90 megawatt hour. So any sensible person would add these up and average the costs out over the total supply (100%) and that would be the cost the consumer would pay - but not in Alberta - they turned around and paid all the generators the $90 rate for all their production - even the guys that offered power at zero cost! You couldn't make this stuff up it is so crazy - even the mafia wouldn't be as bold as to try this kind of extortion but it was all approved and allowed to happen on the PC's watch. This is why Alberta had some of the most expensive electricity in North America - straight into the pockets of Enmax and Altalink and their like - because their directors or spouses were often high up members of the PC party.
                      AMEN but you won't make those dyed in the blue toys believe it.

                      Comment


                        #47
                        Originally posted by grassfarmer View Post
                        Depends on how the environment the private industry operates in is set up and governed. Remember the genius system of the AESO auctions whereby the power generating companies had to bid in their offers to supply power over each time period by Dutch auction. So as an example a hydro company might offer in 30% of the requirement at $0 per megawatt hour because they couldn't store the power (this actually happened on occasion) Then the coal generated operators would offer 40% of the requirement at $10, then some other generator would offer in 25% of the requirement at $50 leaving only 5% of the supply to fill - which could be done by say nuclear generation - at $90 megawatt hour. So any sensible person would add these up and average the costs out over the total supply (100%) and that would be the cost the consumer would pay - but not in Alberta - they turned around and paid all the generators the $90 rate for all their production - even the guys that offered power at zero cost! You couldn't make this stuff up it is so crazy - even the mafia wouldn't be as bold as to try this kind of extortion but it was all approved and allowed to happen on the PC's watch. This is why Alberta had some of the most expensive electricity in North America - straight into the pockets of Enmax and Altalink and their like - because their directors or spouses were often high up members of the PC party.
                        Could very well be as you described, I don't know but isn't that exactly the left wing social system in a nutshell?? Pay everyone the same no matter the need or contribution!! You should be happy with that! LOL.

                        Merry Christmas anyhow, Santa is on his way.

                        Comment


                          #48
                          Originally posted by Horse View Post
                          The oil sands have a special deal so I don't believe we would have produced less and even if we did we would still have some cheap congenital crude to sell.
                          IMHO its because of the likes of GDR ,LEP ,Hamloc that we are in this mess if you as good supporters of the cons would have been watching what was going on and held them accountable instead of making excuses for them ,we had one of the most arrogant cons Ken Kowalski , then Steve west ,for his boondoggle of elect deregulation,I could go on forever but I fail to see how the NDs could possibly ****up worse than those assholes did
                          Horse, you make a lot of judgements on my political leanings. First off did I support Ralph Klein? Yes initially the cuts in spending and the lowering of the debt were very positive. Near the end of his tenure me and the PC's parted ways. I never agreed with privatizing the electrical system(to small of a market for real competition) and near the end of Ralph's days he would just throw money at a problem without thinking. Now of course Horse, you would think the fact that I have voted Wildrose ever since to even be worse. First and foremost I want a financially responsible government. The PC's weren't, the NDP are not. But I am also realistic. I realize that there is no way we can lower government spending enough now to balance the budget nor should we. So today there is really no party with a platform that I agree with totally. Imo the province would be much better off with a sales tax than a carbon tax. The present carbon tax does nothing to help the debt and is just used by the NDP to buy votes. Also as a farmer I realize I am dependant at present on fossil fuels and that the carbon tax will disproportionately cost me money with no perceived benefit. While a sales tax would cost me money it would at least go towards health care and education. Regardless, Horse I hope you and your family have a Merry Chistmas

                          Comment

                          • Reply to this Thread
                          • Return to Topic List
                          Working...