Global Warming WTF??

[chuckChuck]

Hope you freeze you ASS off ! **** your politicians! You can not prove a god dam thing 50 years into the future. It's an AGENDA, wake the hell up!

A fjlip you have always had such a rosy outlook on life. What happened?

[AlbertaFarmer5]

So your only response is it is a bunch of lies, bullshit and a giant conspiracy! Hahahahahah.

If that is the best you can come up with, then there is not a snowball chance in hell you will ever win this.

Everybody else including all the federal Conservative MPs except one don't buy your way out there conspiracy theories!

Give up!

No, the only way either side wins is when enough time has elapsed for the temperature record to prove one side or the other correct. At this point, both sides think they have enough evidence already, so I'd say we are not quite there yet. That said, the past couple of decades have not been as helpful to the warmist side as they had hoped and promised they would be.

[seldomseen]

So Chucky do you believe that Michael Mann's hockey stick diagram is accurate?


Strait yes or no answer please. No copy and paste please.

[bobofthenorth]

Its a sad day when Scott Adams (Dilbert) is more honest than our Prime Minister. Unfortunately the AGW climate scam has a lot of momentum and there is a huge herd whose livelihood depends on keeping the train running. Its frightening when you start watching the bad decisions that are being made in the name of carbon. The carbon tax is just one of hundreds of bad policy decisions that are driven by the false AGW narrative. I wonder how much carbon tax we'll have to pay on the Mary J that we're going to be allowed to smoke?

[chuckChuck]

So Chucky do you believe that Michael Mann's hockey stick diagram is accurate?


Strait yes or no answer please. No copy and paste please.

Yes.

And here is why:

https://www.skepticalscience.com/broken-hockey-stick.htm
"Since the hockey stick paper in 1998, there have been a number of proxy studies analysing a variety of different sources including corals, stalagmites, tree rings, boreholes and ice cores. They all confirm the original hockey stick conclusion: the 20th century is the warmest in the last 1000 years and that warming was most dramatic after 1920.

A critique of the hockey stick was published in 2004 (McIntyre 2004), claiming the hockey stick shape was the inevitable result of the statistical method used (principal components analysis). They also claimed temperatures over the 15th Century were derived from one bristlecone pine proxy record. They concluded that the hockey stick shape was not statistically significant.

An independent assessment of Mann's hockey stick was conducted by the National Center for Atmospheric Research (Wahl 2007). They reconstructed temperatures employing a variety of statistical techniques (with and without principal components analysis). Their results found slightly different temperatures in the early 15th Century. However, they confirmed the principal results of the original hockey stick - that the warming trend and temperatures over the last few decades are unprecedented over at least the last 600 years."

[chuckChuck]

I forgot to mention that if you are still doubtful about whether global warming is real and don't believe the science go look at the glaciers between Jasper and Banff. There are signs that show since 1843 the Athabaska glacier has shrunk 1.5 kilometres. Does that indicate warming or cooling?

[AlbertaFarmer5]

I forgot to mention that if you are still doubtful about whether global warming is real and don't believe the science go look at the glaciers between Jasper and Banff. There are signs that show since 1843 the Athabaska glacier has shrunk 1.5 kilometres. Does that indicate warming or cooling?

That indicates the continuation of a trend which is been ongoing for over 12,000 years. With various setbacks and fits and starts along the way. Offers hope for humanity that the trend will continue. And in no way is indicative of human causes.
A reasonable person can understand that climate is changing/warming and not believe humans are entirely to blame or that it would have a negative net result.

[Guest]

like i said , wasting our breath

[furrowtickler]

[seldomseen]

like i said , wasting our breath

Your right Case I could say more but what would be the point.