Originally posted by Sheepwheat
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Does Canada have a process to remove an incompetent or corrupt leader?
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
-
Not quite sure how white privilege is related to my original post, other than our current PM is the ultimate example.
I'm seeking constitutional advice on how to extricate ourselves from this disasterous regime. So, there is no precedent, and it appears that only Cabinet, the GG and the queen could save us now. As I understand it, there is no crime sinister enough, or mental deficiency dangerous enough that would require he be removed from office. So the people are powerless against him.
Comment
-
Outside of a successful non confidence vote in the House there is really no way to oust an incompetent or corrupt Prime Minister. After the India debacle, the opposition should really move a non confidence vote. No chance of winning, but a great debating point and would force the usually absent "fortunate son" into Parliament.
Comment
-
Only way it happens is inside caucus. Liberal MP's have to start believing he can't carry them to victory and that they'd be better off starting from scratch in the hunt for a leader. At the moment the Liberal party is all about Trudeau. Up and until the release of the ethics commissioners report on his vacay to the agha khans private island, the PMO had been doing a great job of polishing his image. It hasn't been a good couple of months.
Kinder Morgan is a simmering dumpster fire with two provinces at each other's neck, and a third province (quebec) watching intently to see whether the feds are willing to use their constitutional powers to usurp provincial interests. If KMX dies a slow death like Energy East we will continue to lose $B's economically, but Trudeau stands to lose significant votes in BC and QC. His attempt at social license and consensus building has so far not born fruit.
Then there's his unfiltered reply to a vet that he and many others are asking too much of their government. For a PMO obsessed with optics and brand-building, that one looked BAD!
The TPP shitshow? We gave up our veto to get some flowery words inserted in the document...
The forced flop in China? Why send the PM? That's what trade ministers, deputy ministers, and buerocrats are for. The PM is supposed to get the victory lap!
NAFTA? There may very well be issues that need to be hammered out, but gender, diversity, and living wage addendums? There was no need to shoot ourselves in the foot!
Peoplekind? Again, for a PMO obsessed with optics that had obviously not gotten past the focus group stage.
And then of course we arrive at India. Wow! Simply Wow! The domestic let alone intl media are in no hurry to let this one go, and could very well have traction going forward.
Our PM has gone from being portrayed as CaptainCanada to #CaptainCrayon, or #MrDressup... a taxpayer funded 7 day jaunt to load up on pictures aimed at specific voting blocs?
I mean God God, in frantic damage control mode, they paraded out a career beurocrat with the highest security clearances to suggest to our national media, under protection of annonimity that this was cooked up by the Indian gov't to make Trudeau look like a plug! Nah... He managed to do that all on his own.
The domestic media have turned on him...
Don Martin (CTV): "If this is Trudeau putting Canada back on the world stage, we should get off."
Again Don martin: "Given his now-proven tendency to bring tension to otherwise calm international relationships, Justin Trudeau should just stay home."
Terry Glavin (Ottawa Citizen)"it would have been better, in hindsight, if Trudeau had gone to India alone, invited himself to dinner with Modi, and thrown up in his lap."
The Globe and Mail editorial board: "Yesterday, we quaintly said the India trip seemed awkward and unproductive. Those were the days."
The Toronto Star: “We’re relying too much on how photogenic and how popular we think the prime minister is, and it’s beginning to backfire on us.â€
Read David Akin tonight, or Andrew Coyne, or Ujjal Dosanjh,
If this thing continues to have legs, or they find out someone in the PMO directly lobbied for Visas for these Sikh separatists, the knives will come out. Honestly, 2019 was never the Conservative parties to win. Only Trudeaus to lose. He's a two termer at a minimum unless he grabs for more rope than he can handle!
Comment
-
I see him as trying way too hard to be EVERYTHING he is not. Try being a common sense leader for a change. As a proud Canadian I am embarrassed. Something has to be done, something has to change. The Liberal Party better have a talk with their Prince Charming that has turned into a National, and even worse, an International disgrace. I can accept and tolerate alot, but this is getting ridiculous.
Comment
-
People please don't let your kids do drugs!
And especially if you are rich don't because now a days that's just a guarantee you have a chance to be a politician.
Comment
-
Originally posted by the big wheel View PostPeople please don't let your kids do drugs!
And especially if you are rich don't because now a days that's just a guarantee you have a chance to be a politician.
Comment
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avIjlRz52iY
Nial Ferguson explains how the US constitution was designed to manage a situation like Trump. The US system is a triage of checks and balances, & independent votes, works. Compare to Canada if you dare.
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment