• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sask crop insurance isnt insurance. It's a tax.

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    That's the difference

    Comment


      #22
      Just renewed home insurance. Basic 3 yr old farm house worth $250000. Think double wide and you get the idea. Premium is $556 per year. Crap insurance is a little better here in AB but not much. Comparable premium for your $331 worth of coverage on canola would be $0.73. Government may be even more inefficient than we feared. I think administration of crop insurance burns money like nothing else. How much more is the loss payout ratio really?
      Last edited by ajl; Mar 19, 2018, 09:24.

      Comment


        #23
        Wiseguy, on the above, Risk area 7, class G (better Ghetto dirt) 0% premium discount, 70% coverage, base price.....premium is $14.41......almost ten bucks cheaper than 80% coverage(base price)

        5% premium to coverage ratio versus 7.3% for 80%....huge difference.

        Comment


          #24
          Opt out of Municipal Hail and take a reduced(70%) Crap Insurance Coverage?

          Municipal Hail cancellation deadline March 31...........

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by wiseguy
            Farma ! You mentioned the establishment benefit rule ! Did sask crop insurance screw you in the past ??
            We've only ever been in crop insursnce twice (I think!) and so long ago I can't remember when...once was when "GRIP" was brought in! So no I didn't bring up the crop establishment issue but I did comment on it in a thread where someone else mentioned it....was that you?

            Is AgStab definitely dropping the allowable expense calculation as a reference for a payment trigger? (Versus 70% of the Olympic average of the previous five years' margins?)

            Comment


              #26
              Imagine picking the coverage you want, choosing from 22 different companies and either selecting multi peril or named peril crop insurance.



              All at lower cost than GARS or SCIC...

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by Klause View Post
                Imagine picking the coverage you want, choosing from 22 different companies and either selecting multi peril or named peril crop insurance.



                All at lower cost than GARS or SCIC...
                .......go on......

                Comment


                  #28
                  And on

                  Comment


                    #29
                    http://www.saskcropinsurance.com/agristability/ http://www.saskcropinsurance.com/agristability/

                    WISEGUY IS RIGHT, THEY DROPPED THE ELIGIBLE EXPENSE MARGIN LIMIT CALCULATION USED TO TRIGGER PROGRAM BENEFITS. (or should I say prevent triggering a payment!!!!!)

                    THIS IS A POSITIVE MOVE, THANKS FOR THE HEADS UP WISEGUY.

                    Edit......, if it wasn't for the average eligible expense margin limit used to trigger a payment instead of 70% of the Olympic average of the previous 5 years margin calculation I would have been in a claim position of over $54K in the 2014 program year because of some real healthy reference margins in the precious five years. 😠
                    Last edited by farmaholic; Mar 19, 2018, 21:57.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by farmaholic View Post
                      .......go on......
                      The Argentina system...

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...