Britain throwing out some undesirables.

[grassfarmer]

Well done Britain! getting rid of a bunch of Russian agents and in the same week refusing entry to some other undesirables as well - like the 3 Alt-Right trouble makers including Lauren Southern.

Somebody was saying on here recently they were embarrassed by Canada - well here is a good reason to be - at least for those of you funding organisations that send employees into areas of racial tension in foreign countries to incite violence and hatred so they can film the result and sell it as "news".

[Robertbarlage]

kinda like the cbc. Gerald stanley case.

[grassfarmer]

kinda like the cbc. Gerald stanley case.

No, they were reporting on a crime and then the trial - not trying to instigate a crime and then report on it.

[burnt]

Well done Britain! getting rid of a bunch of Russian agents and in the same week refusing entry to some other undesirables as well - like the 3 Alt-Right trouble makers including Lauren Southern.

Somebody was saying on here recently they were embarrassed by Canada - well here is a good reason to be - at least for those of you funding organisations that send employees into areas of racial tension in foreign countries to incite violence and hatred so they can film the result and sell it as "news".

Wow, you follow some pretty interesting people, laddie.

Levant, we know, and now Lauren Southern.

So your name grows, of course, to reflect your interests -hello grassantern LOL!

[blueversi]

[QUOTE=grassfarmer;373472]No, they were reporting on a crime and then the trial - not trying to instigate a crime and then report on it.[/QUOTE
By reporting you must mean being one sided and leaving out important information.

[Guest]

like the hijab incident in Ontario?

[grassfarmer]

Wow, you follow some pretty interesting people, laddie.

Levant, we know, and now Lauren Southern.

So your name grows, of course, to reflect your interests -hello grassantern LOL!

Don't follow these clowns but I do follow credible news outlets like the BBC who reported this story. They are also reporting that Trump was caught on tape admitting he was lying about the Canada/US trade deficits - dumb as a bag of monkeys!



[QUOTE=blueversi;373474]

No, they were reporting on a crime and then the trial - not trying to instigate a crime and then report on it.[/QUOTE
By reporting you must mean being one sided and leaving out important information.

You may argue the reporting was biased if it did not agree with your outlook but CBC did not cause the tragic incident on that SK farm. That's the difference - these Rebel trash are trying to create violence so they can use it to bring in income for their sorry outfit.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Grass, do i understand you correctly that you are denying the violence, murders and expropriation going on in South Africa, or are you referring to something different?

[burnt]

Don't follow these clowns but I do follow credible news outlets like the BBC who reported this story. They are also reporting that Trump was caught on tape admitting he was lying about the Canada/US trade deficits - dumb as a bag of monkeys!

Interesting, grassantern, what did your "credible source" BBC have to say about the Telford child ****/molestation rings and the ethnicity of the organizers and rapists?

Here, let me help you out: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-shropshire-43385515 http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-shropshire-43385515

The BBC admits the problem of child sex-slave rings.

However, what the BBC seems to omit - inadvertently, I'm sure, is that the ring was run predominantly by men of "Middle Eastern origins". At least, we won't say specifically what origin, because we don't want to appear "racist", now do we grass?

Sure, we call that credible.

Need more evidence of their complicity in shielding the ethnicity of these organized pedophile rings? Here you go, grass:

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-shropshire-43391605 http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-shropshire-43391605

Grassfarmer, your post raises serious questions about why you would side with child abusers and terrorists, and rail against those who would expose them for what they are.

What kind of twisted or demented person would EVER be caught siding with this most vile people in our society?

Who is it that looks "dumb as a bag of monkeys" - or worse?

[grassfarmer]

Who is it that looks "dumb as a bag of monkeys" - or worse?

Donald Trump - but you're working hard to add yourself to the category. What about the Catholic church - I guess you've never heard of them having problems with pedophilia? They probably get a pass from you though because they are white and "Christians".
Point being news reporters are supposed to report news. They are not supposed to start out with an agenda then stage events to promote that agenda and claim it's news.
Case in point this Southern character going to another country and into an area with pre-existing racial tensions and handing out flyers proclaiming "Allah is a gay god" no doubt hoping someone would hit her or start a fight at which point she would claim muslims are violent attackers. The world doesn't need trouble makers like her, what an embarrassment to Canada, well done to Britain for denying her access to the country.

[burnt]

"...probably...", "...no doubt hoping..."

Speculation should not be confused with evidence.

However, it does provide the evidence that you are nothing more than a vacuous buffoon trying to hide behind empty charges - again.

Your revolting and willing cover for terrorist and pedophiles would be reluctantly ignored as just more manifestation of Liberal mental illness, except for one thing - your indirect complicity just happens to enable this pervasive scourge that affects all of us.

What you fail to understand is that a few brave people are working to expose the deliberate ignorance and corruption that has paralyzed the screening process that protects a sovereign nation.

And of course, since they are effectively exposing the truth, they are being shut down because. well, it's easier than dealing with the real problem.

What is an enemy of the State?

[15444]

And here I thought this thread was a brief history of how Grassy came to Canada.

[binthere]

Eventually when the neo Marxists like grass reach their goal of total suppression of free speech. Many on here won't have to use the ignore key.

[grassfarmer]

Interesting, grassantern, what did your "credible source" BBC have to say about the Telford child ****/molestation rings and the ethnicity of the organizers and rapists?

Here, let me help you out: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-shropshire-43385515 http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-shropshire-43385515

The BBC admits the problem of child sex-slave rings.

However, what the BBC seems to omit - inadvertently, I'm sure, is that the ring was run predominantly by men of "Middle Eastern origins". At least, we won't say specifically what origin, because we don't want to appear "racist", now do we grass?

Sure, we call that credible.

Need more evidence of their complicity in shielding the ethnicity of these organized pedophile rings? Here you go, grass:

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-shropshire-43391605 http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-shropshire-43391605

Grassfarmer, your post raises serious questions about why you would side with child abusers and terrorists, and rail against those who would expose them for what they are.

What kind of twisted or demented person would EVER be caught siding with this most vile people in our society?

Who is it that looks "dumb as a bag of monkeys" - or worse?

Why bother posting links if you don't understand the content or more likely deliberately choose to misrepresent it?
These stories are about sensational claims made by the Mirror newspaper - the kind of gutter publication that Levant would be proud of. The BBC's role in this was to air the accusations the paper made and discuss it with the police among other sources. The BBC did not attempt to conceal the origin of the perpetrators - it showed the pictures of a group of perpetrators convicted in 2012 and stated in both articles that they were mainly of South Asian origin and named Pakistan specifically.
The area police chief vigorously disputes the number of cases being claimed and pointing out that to sensationalize the story the Mirror had to go back 30 years to get the numbers they claimed. He also disputed claims that the offenders are predominantly groups of Asian men. Police data indicates that sexual offences in his area are committed proportionate to the cross section of society and ethnicities living there.

So you were wrong about the BBC's role in this, wrong about the actual facts of the cases - but you did fall for a sensationalized media story printed in the gutter press. For the afore mentioned accomplishments I hereby award honorary membership of the "dumb as a bag of monkeys" club.

[burnt]

Why bother posting links if you don't understand the content or more likely deliberately choose to misrepresent it?
These stories are about sensational claims made by the Mirror newspaper - the kind of gutter publication that Levant would be proud of. The BBC's role in this was to air the accusations the paper made and discuss it with the police among other sources. The BBC did not attempt to conceal the origin of the perpetrators - it showed the pictures of a group of perpetrators convicted in 2012 and stated in both articles that they were mainly of South Asian origin and named Pakistan specifically.
The area police chief vigorously disputes the number of cases being claimed and pointing out that to sensationalize the story the Mirror had to go back 30 years to get the numbers they claimed. He also disputed claims that the offenders are predominantly groups of Asian men. Police data indicates that sexual offences in his area are committed proportionate to the cross section of society and ethnicities living there.

So you were wrong about the BBC's role in this, wrong about the actual facts of the cases - but you did fall for a sensationalized media story printed in the gutter press. For the afore mentioned accomplishments I hereby award honorary membership of the "dumb as a bag of monkeys" club.

Oh I see, if there were only 100 girls ****d and passed around like a piece of meat by these "Asian" pedophiles, you'd be okay with that kind of accuracy...

Is there anyone here who would like to be called "smart" by someone who covers for terrorists and habitual child-rapists?