• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Melting Arctic Sea Ice May Be To Blame For Endless Winter: Scientists It's an increas

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View Post
    DML, there's only one problem with that, there is no increase in the rate of sea level rise. They will continue to rise with or without additional CO2, As they have been for millennia. People will continue to be displaced, we will have to pay for it regardless. Might as well at least have increased CO2 levels so we can grow more on the land which will not eventually be submerged under the oceans.
    Oh no, AlbertaFarmer5 says there is no increase in rate of sea level rise. Yet 2018 NASA study says it is.
    https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2018/new-study-finds-sea-level-rise-accelerating https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2018/new-study-finds-sea-level-rise-accelerating
    And a 2016 Scientific American report from the National Academy of Sciences says it is:
    https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/new-data-reveal-stunning-acceleration-of-sea-level-rise/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/new-data-reveal-stunning-acceleration-of-sea-level-rise/
    And the 2006 paper A 20th century acceleration in global sea‐level rise by John A. Church and Neil J. White says it is:
    https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2005GL024826 https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2005GL024826
    and even Wikipedia supports acceleration of sea level rise:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level_rise https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level_rise

    Oh who will I believe????

    Comment


      #22
      I hope i got this right because i am a little mixed up some days or most days if you ask my wife.

      When it hot its global warming and then when its cold its global warming. If it rains lots its global warming and if its dry it is also global warming.

      Chuck do i kind of got it right?

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by dmlfarmer View Post
        Oh no, AlbertaFarmer5 says there is no increase in rate of sea level rise. Yet 2018 NASA study says it is.
        https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2018/new-study-finds-sea-level-rise-accelerating https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2018/new-study-finds-sea-level-rise-accelerating
        And a 2016 Scientific American report from the National Academy of Sciences says it is:
        https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/new-data-reveal-stunning-acceleration-of-sea-level-rise/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/new-data-reveal-stunning-acceleration-of-sea-level-rise/
        And the 2006 paper A 20th century acceleration in global sea‐level rise by John A. Church and Neil J. White says it is:
        https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2005GL024826 https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2005GL024826
        and even Wikipedia supports acceleration of sea level rise:
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level_rise https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level_rise

        Oh who will I believe????
        You shouldn't believe anyone, science isn't about belief it's about facts. Perhaps check the underlying data used for those studies that you offered. How they handled discontinuities, how many adjustments, how is isostatic adjustment taken into account. But don't believe anything some random booster on the Internet posts, such as me. Send certainly don't believe Wikipedia Who's Editing process on these subjects is well known. You seem knowledgeable enough to be able to analyze the data and draw your own conclusions.

        Leave the believing to the religious nuts where it belongs.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View Post
          You shouldn't believe anyone, science isn't about belief it's about facts. Perhaps check the underlying data used for those studies that you offered. How they handled discontinuities, how many adjustments, how is isostatic adjustment taken into account. But don't believe anything some random booster on the Internet posts, such as me. Send certainly don't believe Wikipedia Who's Editing process on these subjects is well known. You seem knowledgeable enough to be able to analyze the data and draw your own conclusions.

          Leave the believing to the religious nuts where it belongs.
          you are absolutely right. So provide me with the verified and irrefutable facts that you must have to make the claim that sea level rise is not accelerating. I am more than willing to consider these with the same nuances that you use to dispute the 4 studies I linked. But you back up your claim and until I see such studies and have the opportunity to judge their credibility, I am sorry I will not accept your word for no change in sea level rise.

          Comment


            #25
            Well, if Arctic ice melted, how much did sea levels go down?

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by seldomseen View Post
              I hope i got this right because i am a little mixed up some days or most days if you ask my wife.

              When it hot its global warming and then when its cold its global warming. If it rains lots its global warming and if its dry it is also global warming.

              Chuck do i kind of got it right?
              No seldomseen you do not have it right. Temperatures, hot or cold, or if it is raining or dry out is WEATHER and not climate change or global warming. Weather changes day to day and even hour to hour. Climate change is measured over decades, 30 years is probably the minimum duration to measure climate change. However, a changing climate will result is a change in average tempertures, rainfall amounts, growing degree days etc. It can lead to more drought or above average rainfall in a localized area, especially when larger storms result is larger rainfall events. Or as we may have just witnessed, a warmer Arctic combined with a weakened jet stream may have caused a cold spring here.

              Comment


                #27
                Oh crap story of my life, always wrong. I guess my wife is right!

                Comment


                  #28
                  just think if they put this much energy into fighting pollution , plastic in the oceans , raw shit in lakes and rivers , etc....... oh wait , there's no easy money to be made off of that , is there ? ..................

                  Comment


                    #29
                    this is the definition of insanity , I think ?

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by caseih View Post
                      this is the definition of insanity , I think ?
                      Exactly Case! Fukashima is spewing huge quantities of highly radioactive water directly into the pacific. A disaster of epic proportion that is not getting any better. Its so terrible that losing the entire pacific ocean is a possibility. Yet these gullible socialist global warming sheeple keep the fight going strong against a non problem the inert gas C02. The most fundamental requirement of plantlife. Im really sick of it already grass, chuck and dml. Find a cause worth fighting for, not one that will make Canadian farmers even less competetive.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...