• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Driving today Palliser/Goyder

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Driving today Palliser/Goyder

    Had to take my son to a 5 day welding course today 145 kms away.

    Had a pee stop in a roadside turn out at about 105km mark and was a monument.

    It was saying this is goyders line.

    Goyder was a sureveyor in 1800s and worked out what was good farming land and lesser farming land by viewing vegetation. Turn out historically he wasnt far off the mark until say last 15 years with advent of better farming practices and lower rainfall cereal pulse and canola breeding so maybe farming can be pushed into these drier areas.

    Anyone who follows bullaburra on face book they are well the wrong side of goyders line.

    But drought frequency is still high.

    Has palliser and his triangle proved to be roughly correct or similiar to the above better farming drier areas can be farmed?

    ps im about 100km the good side of goyders line.

    Hopefully i will not offend anyone and god knows were foragefarmer farmers but my almost 6000 km tour of western canada last year i thought lethbridge was very dry as was rolling hills were i stayed for a few days.

    To farmers in those areas i humbly apologize if i got it wrong just what i saw.

    Is medicine hat bit light on for rainfall as well? Again apologies to medicine hat farmers.

    Hope the slum of the ghetto farmer aint pissed at me im sure hes not bit like me were low rainfall famers but we make do.

    Please note no reference to politics...........or political leaders........

    #2
    Okay now, that was just outright funny as it got further on...but the beginning was very interesting.

    All those apologies - sorry, but you'd make a great Canadian!

    Comment


      #3
      Farming in the Palliser triangle has been quite successful as of late so for the most part he was wrong as new technology, methods and different crop choices has made it quite viable. Paying $500K per quarter for land in these areas is likely unsustainable though. The old timers always blamed drought for crop failure historically when there were other factors at play, the major one being poor fertility so that is why there is an obsession with rainfall. Still need timely rainfall, just not as much volume as presumed.

      Comment


        #4
        Mallee....no offense taken. I joke about where I farm about being the Slum of the Ghetto....it's just an average area. I've definitely seen better and also worse. Its all I know.

        On a more defined soil classification map we are in the "moist dark brown" zone...a zone that is probably the transition between the dark brown and black zones.

        As for rainfall...it always has been an obsession, even with the soil classification. The family has always been sky watchers. They taught the next generation there is always a drought lurking around the corner, as they only seem to recall and talk about only the dry years...lol!

        High input and continuous cropping has narrowed the productivity gap between the "good" land and "other" land. It may never be equal but the difference sure isn't as stark anymore either.

        As for being pissed off and leaving this site. Nah, Dylan and Stonepicker haven't driven me away yet so I think my skin is thick enough for this internet playground...I don't bully easy!

        Comment


          #5
          If you look far enough back through the proxy records, it would seem that Palliser was right, at least more often than not. We have been in a wet and moderate cycle for so long that we all think this is normal, and maybe it is. All I know is I look brilliant when mother nature cooperates on any time scale.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View Post
            If you look far enough back through the proxy records, it would seem that Palliser was right, at least more often than not. We have been in a wet and moderate cycle for so long that we all think this is normal, and maybe it is. All I know is I look brilliant when mother nature cooperates on any time scale.
            Like.

            Comment


              #7
              Does that mean the too wet areas shouldn't be "farmed" either because of the challenges they face?

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by farmaholic View Post
                Does that mean the too wet areas shouldn't be "farmed" either because of the challenges they face?
                Tile Drainage "fixes" too wet areas and the surrounding issues (alkalinity/salinity, poor soil structure).

                Irrigation "fixes" too dry areas.


                Pipelines and aqueducts move water from the "too wet" to the "too dry" areas and their issues (low OM, low productivity, poor soil structure).

                Oh wait a second. I forgot. We're in western Canada.

                Nobody move! Nobody dream! Nobody do anything!

                Comment


                  #9
                  Me thinks rain on the way this weekend. It’s Farm Progress Show.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    seems we agree goyder was basically correct but modern farming methods have changed things.

                    but weather still rules

                    just did some reading about pallisers triangle seems its more soil type than rainfall am i near the mark?

                    wonder if other such areas lines occur in other countries

                    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goyder%27s_Line
                    Last edited by malleefarmer; Jun 19, 2018, 15:35.

                    Comment

                    • Reply to this Thread
                    • Return to Topic List
                    Working...