• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Money in Bank vs Owning land? I think the tides have turned.

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #61
    Jazz, Like... Good responses.

    Comment


      #62
      You may want to check your math again.

      Originally posted by jazz View Post
      Well its sort of a best of both worlds. You want to keep your land, but you want to increase your return or diversify your holdings. There are a number of ETFs offering covered calls on banks which basically doubles their dividends but gives up long term increases. Great for cashflow, but not appreciation.

      Couple things about stocks though, the move sometimes a lot based on nothing. You have to ignore the day to day stuff.

      Second thing, stocks can compound. There is no more powerful investment on the planet. SK3 $650k invested at 5% return would just about triple in 10 yrs. Your land wont triple again in your lifetime.
      A 5% annual return would not even double in 10 years let alone triple.
      Check out the Rule of 72 for quick way to figure out amount of time needed to double your investment with a given % return.

      Comment


        #63
        Originally posted by redbull81 View Post
        A 5% annual return would not even double in 10 years let alone triple.
        Check out the Rule of 72 for quick way to figure out amount of time needed to double your investment with a given % return.
        5% annually compounded would yield 62% after 10 years.

        Would need 11.6% to triple in 10 years.

        In this environment, there are no guaranteed return no-risk investments that will yield close to that.

        Comment


          #64
          And you guys believe Alberta and Sask land will double by 2027. To 1.6 mill and 1 mill in Sask. Fm. Like that will happen.

          The whole example is why would a investor put money into land if they can make 100 a acre return selling the property.

          Comment


            #65
            Sorry, not triple, but a close double before taxes.

            Land in my area has tripled in 10 yrs but is that sustainable? Its build on low interest rates and speculative demand, not really profits. The equities market reflects real revenues much closer although there is speculation in there too. I'm not talking buying Tesla or anything.

            I am a strong believer in diversified income especially for a certain size of farmer. Trying to set my my place up with fixed income (rent), investment income (stocks) and business income (farming). 3 legs of the income "stool". I am way to dependent on mother nature and fickle markets and CN/CP to have all my eggs in one basket.
            Last edited by jazz; Jul 6, 2018, 07:33.

            Comment


              #66
              There is one guaranteed investment return - paying off debt.

              Comment


                #67
                Jazz

                Dumb question....but once you start earning money from rent or other investments ...what is the incentive to farm?

                Comment


                  #68
                  Anyone can go buy dirt.


                  There's millions of acres of it works wide and lots comming into production.


                  Lots of places where you can own land...

                  And that's something to keep in mind.


                  Dirt will feed your family in tough times. But in Canada you don't own dirt. You own a tenure from the crown...


                  Thats why expropriation works so easily.


                  Successive social justice governments will erode land rights more and more. The aboriginals don't need direct title. They just need to stop all development or slow it to the point where it doesn't pay anymoere to develop anything - sound familiar?


                  Land is a great physical thing to hold. But in 5 years buying it will be more fun than today.

                  Comment


                    #69
                    Originally posted by Klause View Post


                    Land is a great physical thing to hold. But in 5 years buying it will be more fun than today.
                    But will it really be more fun? If events conspire to drive the price of land down so far that it is "fun" to buy, that likely be a combination of higher interest rates, banks reluctant to lend without large down payments and substantial equity, and low or negative profitability in not only ag, but all the other commodities which make our economy hum, and helps prop up the price of land in many markets. I think it would be more fun to buy at the peak of the euphoria than at the depth of the depression, although the fun might not last as long buying the highs.

                    I started buying land in the second half of the nineties, and have been promised that prices will drop and interest rates will rise ever since, someday I will regret not listening, but if I'd listened, my most ambitious years would be long since behind me by the time I ever got to take advantage of the cheap land. Bought a piece in 2012 from a local farmer who was convinced that was the peak, and it was time to get out.
                    Last edited by AlbertaFarmer5; Jul 6, 2018, 09:53.

                    Comment


                      #70
                      Originally posted by bucket View Post
                      Jazz

                      Dumb question....but once you start earning money from rent or other investments ...what is the incentive to farm?
                      Well because, sometimes events conspire and you do make a profit. At the very least you are paying down an asset that might be more valuable in the future. While you are paying it down, its positive cashflow ability should be increasing...technically.

                      I assume klause is referring to land coming into production from the old soviet bloc countries. Thats the probably only place where land can be brought online unless you think we are going to knock down amazon forests. If there is new land coming online, its being farmed by much less efficient farmers than us and its probably in politically unstable areas or places much more susceptible to weather. Its not a threat, but I agree the threat from our own govt is much bigger.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...