• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Last year was warmest ever that didn't feature an El Niño, report finds

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Chucky , you in your bunker yet ?? But still get cell service? Is that with a solar panel cell boaster ??? What brand ? Must be good one 👍

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by RWT101 View Post
      Did somebody ask for PEER REVIEW?

      http://notrickszone.com/#sthash.1sMsWc0V.dpbs

      Enjoy C2.
      Albertafarmer5 called it right. Its a denier site.

      And without the full scientific papers and the ability to understand the science who among us can come to any conclusions.

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
        Albertafarmer5 called it right. Its a denier site.

        And without the full scientific papers and the ability to understand the science who among us can come to any conclusions.
        It's a good thing you aren't predictable. And you wonder why I won't waste valuable time at this time of year posting credible peer reviewed papers which debunk all of your paid propaganda, you dismiss anything which doesn't support your extremist alarmism.

        Actually, the links to all the papers are right there on the website. But that would require effort.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View Post
          It's a good thing you aren't predictable. And you wonder why I won't waste valuable time at this time of year posting credible peer reviewed papers which debunk all of your paid propaganda, you dismiss anything which doesn't support your extremist alarmism.

          Actually, the links to all the papers are right there on the website. But that would require effort.
          And you and I both are both climate scientists!! LOL

          Give up. It is only a small group of hard core Conservatives who don't believe in human caused climate change! Scheer knows this, but the news has not made it to hinterlands of conservative thinking.

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
            And you and I both are both climate scientists!! LOL

            Give up. It is only a small group of hard core Conservatives who don't believe in human caused climate change! Scheer knows this, but the news has not made it to hinterlands of conservative thinking.

            So, did you follow the links to the peer reviewed papers? You don't need to be a climate scientist to comprehend that they contradict your alarmist claims of impending catastrophe.

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
              And you and I both are both climate scientists!! LOL

              Give up. It is only a small group of hard core Conservatives who don't believe in human caused climate change! Scheer knows this, but the news has not made it to hinterlands of conservative thinking.
              Mentioning that you are not a scientist is redundant, since you once again use the word believe in regards to a scientific theory. So I will remind you again, believe is relegated to religions and fairy tails, science uses facts, experiments and evidence. It would boost your credibility imensly if you would stop comparing your fanaticism with religious cults.

              Comment


                #27
                Getting back to the study which started this thread. Anyone else notice how during the El Niño, The claims of warmest year ever completely discounted the fact that there was an el Nino, However now that El Niño is over, And the temperature records are no longer being broken, , suddenly El Nino is relevant again? Then, magically, the third warmest year ever, becomes the warmest year ever with some caveats? As nature continues to refuse to cooperate with the alarmists, we will soon see headlines such as, warmest year ever that ends in a 3, with a solar eclipse, in an odd decade, in which the Yankees didn't make it to the world series, and the Republicans controlled the senate...

                Desperate actions on the part of those who realize they have already lost.

                Comment


                  #28
                  Funny , but sad and true !

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Still too many of them...Click image for larger version

Name:	Tard.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	81.2 KB
ID:	766627 Just use common sense, please

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View Post
                      Getting back to the study which started this thread. Anyone else notice how during the El Niño, The claims of warmest year ever completely discounted the fact that there was an el Nino, However now that El Niño is over, And the temperature records are no longer being broken, , suddenly El Nino is relevant again? Then, magically, the third warmest year ever, becomes the warmest year ever with some caveats? As nature continues to refuse to cooperate with the alarmists, we will soon see headlines such as, warmest year ever that ends in a 3, with a solar eclipse, in an odd decade, in which the Yankees didn't make it to the world series, and the Republicans controlled the senate...

                      Desperate actions on the part of those who realize they have already lost.
                      Very astute observation, AF5!

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	el nino 1A.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	19.6 KB
ID:	766630

                      You see the decade of the 1980s had 3 - THREE - El Nino years! 1982/83, 1986/87 and 1987/88.

                      And in June 1988 James Hansen gave his BS testimony to the US govt that started the Worlds Greatest Hoax.
                      The entire CO2 'end of the world' heating was based on flawed data INTERPRETATION and ignorant greedy scientists and senators.

                      And that's why even NASA could not find the evidence to support their theory for 20 years.
                      NASA finally admitted that WATER VAPOUR plays an important in the making of our weather in a 2008 press releaser.

                      To me, water vapour is the only thing. All weather is determined by the presence of water vapour in the air.
                      Too much, like atmospheric rivers, cause floods or blizzards in cold weather.
                      The absence of water vapour in the air is called drought.
                      In reality, the sun's output is what determines the amount of water vapour.

                      GEE, I wonder what C2 will find wrong with the NASA plot? LOL

                      Following pic is Vegreville area in 1987. It started the Stanislaw Sandblasters club to eliminate 'recreational tillage'.

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	Vegreville east dust storm 87.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	86.3 KB
ID:	766632
                      Last edited by RWT101; Aug 5, 2018, 11:47. Reason: missing word

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...