....in parts of the semi arid plains of Western Canada, producers might have a better chance of being more profitable growing a lower input spring wheat or durum crop than an expensive canola crop. Canola isn't as drought resilient as wheat!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Canola rotations
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
-
Originally posted by helmsdale View PostLike soy on soy, peas on peas, or god forbid the ultimate cash cow wheat on wheat. It only gets better!
Comment
-
Originally posted by WiltonRanch View PostMy thoughts too. Large profits to be had with wheat on wheat. Don’t understand why guys have to grow a bunch of canola sheesh! Even better continuous oats or barley.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by wiseguyCanola on canola looks better than the canola on wheat stubble !
Have a lot in common with you lesmt...at 66
Comment
-
Originally posted by lesmt View PostBeen very successful in growing a wheat/canola rotation for the last 30 years but tired of growing wheat which requires over 50% of my time and almost as much financial contribution with only 35-40% of net income. Been toying with the idea of growing only canola on a canola/summerfallow rotation but was wondering if this rotation would have any negative effects to the one I was previously following. My reasoning is that my canola would be seeded in a more timely fashion and I could tweak my production skills to achieve a 15-20% increase in yield, less wear and tear on machinery, and make my life a bit easier. I'm 68 years old, don't need the cash but would like to keep farming as long as I'm healthy physically and mentally. Rented out 40% of my land base so downsized enough that the present machinery is more than enough to what is presently does. Labour availability is by far my biggest issue and that's why I'm considering this option. Any thoughts good or bad?
In our area when pulses were starting to take off, there were farmers that still farmed 50/50 that rented out their cereal stubble to guys to seed pulses on. They either didn’t have the equipment or desire to, but wanted the benefits. Win win for both parties.
Comment
-
Canola is king, forget about everything;
They been running soy/corn tight for years;
Should be taking notes instead of drinking beers;
Summerfallow is hard to swallow;
Plant Canola corner to corner;
Be a BTO and winter in Arizonerrrr!
Comment
-
Ah I love this topic. Have tried a few times yield the first year of Canola Canola is lower for some reason then stays about the same.
But we only do to square up fields etc.
Rental agreements we are seeing to the north of us have a built-in No Canola on Canola. The reason is the landowner can't find someone to take it over when the BTO is done.
Lots in NE do 1/3 Cereals and 2/3 Canola.
Viagra Capital like it that way.
Clubroot problems are guess were in areas of Canola on Canola wonder why.
Let's kill the one crop that makes us money.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SASKFARMER3 View PostAh I love this topic. Have tried a few times yield the first year of Canola Canola is lower for some reason then stays about the same.
But we only do to square up fields etc.
Rental agreements we are seeing to the north of us have a built-in No Canola on Canola. The reason is the landowner can't find someone to take it over when the BTO is done.
Lots in NE do 1/3 Cereals and 2/3 Canola.
Viagra Capital like it that way.
Clubroot problems are guess were in areas of Canola on Canola wonder why.
Let's kill the one crop that makes us money.
Comment
-
Markets cycle. The high prices for lentils encouraged every BTO in 2016 to plant 5.3 million acres in Sask. Round-Up and Liberty Link made it a cakewalk. And voila, here we are at the downside of the cycle. Now’s Canola’s turn. Just MHO. Follow the money.
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment