• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Crude oil discount? Explain

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Nutjob and Groper both opposed the NEB approved Northern Gateway.
    Trudeau brought in new regulations to kill Energy East to the cheers of loons in Quebec.
    TransMountain was bought for $4.5 billion by the Liberals so they don’t have to make a decision before next federal election......they could ram this through with legislation if they wanted.

    CN, CP are moving record amounts of oil.

    How will grain move once Alberta and northern Saskatchewan finish harvest?

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by Oliver88 View Post
      Nutjob and Groper both opposed the NEB approved Northern Gateway.
      Trudeau brought in new regulations to kill Energy East to the cheers of loons in Quebec.
      TransMountain was bought for $4.5 billion by the Liberals so they don’t have to make a decision before next federal election......they could ram this through with legislation if they wanted.

      CN, CP are moving record amounts of oil.

      How will grain move once Alberta and northern Saskatchewan finish harvest?
      I would forget about TMX ever becoming a reality. I would bet there are no shippers that will want to put a barrel of oil on a pipeline controlled by crazy carbon taxing govts and obstructing, ransom holding native bands and envirowhackos. I wouldnt do a drop of business with that entity.

      Comment


        #23
        Steven Harper a came to power in 2006, 12 years ago. He failed to facilitate significant pipeline capacity increases.

        Trudeau has been in power for just 3 years. He approves of Keystone and wants Transmountain built.

        One has to wonder what credible business plan would suggest increasing oil sand production with large investment in a very cyclical commodity, before securing the ability of getting the product to market?

        One thing we know for sure is, we can't rely on the USA to buy all our extra oil. Thanks to new technology for horizontal drilling and fracking of tight oil, the US is producing more and more of its own oil. That was a market shift that wasn't predicted.

        The oil sands are some of the most expensive to develop, low quality oil in the world.

        As a farmer I would not invest a large amount of my capital to produce grain on the lowest quality land and then wonder why I couldn't make money.

        Some farmers and some of the oil industry often get sucked into to believing the high prices and good times are going to last forever. A quick look at history would tell you otherwise.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
          Steven Harper a came to power in 2006, 12 years ago. He failed to facilitate significant pipeline capacity increases.

          Ahh chuck, what time is Butts coming over for dinner.

          https://calgaryherald.com/opinion/columnists/corbella-trudeau-plain-wrong-about-harpers-pipeline-legacy Trudeau plain wrong about Harper's pipeline legacy

          One of his projects was on the existing transmountain pipeline.
          Last edited by jazz; Oct 14, 2018, 10:09.

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by jazz View Post
            Ahh chuck, what time is Butts coming over for dinner.

            https://calgaryherald.com/opinion/columnists/corbella-trudeau-plain-wrong-about-harpers-pipeline-legacy Trudeau plain wrong about Harper's pipeline legacy

            One of his projects was on the existing transmountain pipeline.
            Did the NEB review Line 67 under a previous Liberal government of Paul Martin? I expect it was applied for under Martin if Harper approved it in 2006 as he just came to power with Minority government in 2006. In any case I stand corrected on Harper and pipelines.

            But I stand by my main point that the oil sands were and are on shaky foundation of poor economics because they are expensive to develop and prone to losing money during periods of low prices or even average prices.

            Unlike conventional oil they take many years to develop production which increases risk. And unlike conventional wells, it is much more expensive and difficult to shut them down to reduce production because the investments are so large.

            If prices of any commodity fall because of over supply or bottlenecks in getting the product to market the last thing you want to do is spend a lot of money producing more.

            The long term political and economic risk of building pipelines are some of the factors that should be part of every business plan assessment.

            Comment


              #26
              So chuck you think you actually know more than a guy whose main job is studying the Oil industry.

              Were screwed because of your idiot Trudeau its that simple even a liberal should get it by now.

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by SASKFARMER3 View Post
                So chuck you think you actually know more than a guy whose main job is studying the Oil industry.

                Were screwed because of your idiot Trudeau its that simple even a liberal should get it by now.
                I have never voted Liberal, unlike you who voted for Goodale.

                I am a casual observer just like you, except I don't start every observation with a tiresome political rant against a party you once voted for! LOL

                And I would never invest in the oil sands because I think they will become a worthless stranded asset as new sources of energy are developed and implemented.
                Last edited by chuckChuck; Oct 14, 2018, 11:26.

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by SASKFARMER3 View Post
                  Jaz your Theory is not going to work because your shipping fracked oil and gas north then back south to the USA. So again wouldn't all this shipping make Canadian oil way more expensive than the oil out of the sand? Plus if you have no way to get a second or third buyer of the product wouldn't you be selling at a discount or fun with math would make that work also.

                  Just saying math is fun and some have no clue.
                  The #1 person with no clue around here is you - you mean you don't realise the whole point of fracking shale gas is to get the fluids to thin the tar sands product so it'll travel down the pipe to the gulf coast? Did you really think the big expensive that goes into fracking was to produce the low price natural gas? How would the math work on that oh clueless one?

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Investment in all sectors of canadas energy profile are warranted. Sands, fracking, light sweet, NGL and even offshore and even renewables and nuclear and hydro as well. We have huge potential in all sectors, but none should fully replace any others until the market warrants it.

                    But I agree with chuck that the oil companies went too much into the sands. And the Liberals overreacted trying to target them as well. Much more production came out of ND in the last decade than the sands.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by jazz View Post
                      Much more production came out of ND in the last decade than the sands.
                      Not in oil it didn't - about 2.8 million bpd versus 1.25 million bpd at peak in ND.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...