Got this interesting brochure in the mail. Average yields of 7 varieties with a low input and high input treatment at 2 different sites. Low input was "reduced seeding rate, no seed treatment and no in-crop fungicide." High input was "higher seeding rate, best seed treatment, extra phos applied and fungicide in-crop".
Fort Whyte, MB site - low input 33.1bu/acre, high input 33bu/acre. (assume very dry as they say "no rain no gain")
Elm Creek, MB site - low input 45.1 bu/acre, high input 47.1bu/acre.
Doesn't seem much evidence that high input is the way to go! Would the best case scenario of 2 bu extra cover the extra input costs?
Fort Whyte, MB site - low input 33.1bu/acre, high input 33bu/acre. (assume very dry as they say "no rain no gain")
Elm Creek, MB site - low input 45.1 bu/acre, high input 47.1bu/acre.
Doesn't seem much evidence that high input is the way to go! Would the best case scenario of 2 bu extra cover the extra input costs?
Comment