• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prof downplays carbon tax’s farm impact

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #25
    Well, Chucky sees when you coat a fertilizer pellet and it only let's go a certain amount of nitrogen as the plant needs it. Ah, and nitrogen makes plants grow.

    So even if it rains you don't have nitrogen leaching etc.

    Praise be the Carbon gods.

    You're out of your league.

    Keep cutting and pasting.

    Comment


      #26
      Originally posted by SASKFARMER3 View Post
      Chuck, you're hilarious.

      You come on here and preach about the great Carbon tax.

      Well maybe your acreage is doing great and you later after the next election can burn your I love Trudeau sign to heat your shack.

      But the reality is you have no clue.

      Yes like furrow says the test you cut and paste is out of date.

      Most use a nitrogen stabilizer or slow release on most fert.

      We direct seed since the early 80s so have done our part. We only work when necessary and min amount of Chem to control weeds like years ago.

      So yea farmers did there part.

      Now in a shitty year try drying grain with Solar or Wind. Won't work.

      You dream in tec colour.

      Cut your grass, run range fed chickens and make sure you sweep your solar panel off and cuddle like its 1928 to stay warm in winter.

      When no one in the world is changing why would we give up oil in Canada.

      Yea France is so happy with all the bullshit taxes.

      Google it could be your friend to learn some things.
      Yup and you my friend are only good at spewing partisan bullshit. A one time liberal supporter who can barely finish a sentence without blaming the liberals for everything!

      Who frequently rambles on about his vacations, as if anybody gives a damn. If you want to talk about your trips to Florida why not join a travel site?

      Why not try debating the issues at hand, back up your arguments with more than partisan rhetoric and made up shit, and actually make a case?

      Comment


        #27
        Originally posted by furrowtickler View Post
        If your not using N stabilizers, there is no “we” in this conversation.
        I will get the reduction numbers when I have time . Got other things to do now on a Sunday with my family.
        Thanks for all the 10-20 year old data though lol .

        So you think nitrous oxide emissions are not still a problem? Tristan Skolrud must have access to the current science and he seems to think they are. I will be waiting for you to prove him and me wrong.
        Last edited by chuckChuck; Dec 2, 2018, 13:37.

        Comment


          #28
          oh, you poor crybaby.

          My trips I report what's happening all way down to Florida and any real farmer can make a decision from what I'm seeing. (mts of grain or still harvesting or massive flooding etc)

          But a guy with an acreage can't figure out jack shit. That's you chuck a wannabee.

          Yea English I hated in both high school and university.

          Guess what chuck you don't really need it to succeed in business. Just as long as you can read the documents and understand what your reading.

          Spelling eye cud doo it bakwords or al rong and peple no wat i mean.

          See stupid people with an agenda make me sick.

          You cut and paste and think you know what's happening but in reality have no clue.

          So keep posting I love guys like you it shows normal Canadian what a stupid idea the carbon tax really is.

          It's a tax chuck nothing more.

          When China and USA and India all decide to do things then Canada should join something.

          It's like Canada phasing out coal yet China and Japan and elsewhere are increasing coal-powered plants.

          I guess like I always say follow the money.

          Chuck, you must sell solar panels for a living and want us stupid farmers to buy in so you can make some money from a useless liberal idea.

          Comment


            #29
            Originally posted by SASKFARMER3 View Post
            oh, you poor crybaby.

            My trips I report what's happening all way down to Florida and any real farmer can make a decision from what I'm seeing. (mts of grain or still harvesting or massive flooding etc)

            But a guy with an acreage can't figure out jack shit. That's you chuck a wannabee.

            Yea English I hated in both high school and university.

            Guess what chuck you don't really need it to succeed in business. Just as long as you can read the documents and understand what your reading.

            Spelling eye cud doo it bakwords or al rong and peple no wat i mean.

            See stupid people with an agenda make me sick.

            You cut and paste and think you know what's happening but in reality have no clue.

            So keep posting I love guys like you it shows normal Canadian what a stupid idea the carbon tax really is.

            It's a tax chuck nothing more.

            When China and USA and India all decide to do things then Canada should join something.

            It's like Canada phasing out coal yet China and Japan and elsewhere are increasing coal-powered plants.

            I guess like I always say follow the money.

            Chuck, you must sell solar panels for a living and want us stupid farmers to buy in so you can make some money from a useless liberal idea.
            Obviously you are incapable of an intelligent thoughtful response. You prove my points over and over.

            Comment


              #30
              HAHAHAHA

              Chuck every time you cut and paste your bullshit you prove you have no clue.

              why do you want to go back to living like our grandfathers? Off the grid in a cold home and poor.

              Please explain.

              Also, chuck checks out today Farmer Megz posted a question to our Federal minister Mckenna and the response back proves that the federal liberals have no clue.

              Basically, every single thing we do she is telling us to do in her response. Again out of touch. Just like you chuck.

              Comment


                #31
                Ok cut and paste

                Comment


                  #32
                  My first thought when I read this article in the Western Producer was that in downplaying the cost to farmers of a tax on carbon dioxide he didn't look at what would happen if they started to tax methane or nitrous oxide. It is only logical that once the tax on C02 is firmly entrenched that they will cast the net wider. One thing that is guaranteed about government is that it constantly wants to grow. Let's be realistic I think most farmers are forced to be efficient with any input due to constantly rising costs. Where will we realistically cut? The enviros want less meat eaten due to greenhouse emissions. Less fertilizer applied due to emissions. Cutting my greenhouse emissions by 30% isn't going to be achieved by putting solar power in my back yard. In my case I could cut maybe 5-10% but with constantly increasing costs I will need to continue to look for more land to farm which will increase my emissions. Chuck2 I am very interested how you feel you could cut your personal emissions by 30%? And please no cut and paste just a few thoughts on where you feel you can reduce your emissions by 30%.

                  Comment


                    #33
                    chuck will ride his bike and have solar panels on his acreage.

                    Comment


                      #34
                      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wetland_methane_emissions

                      Comment


                        #35
                        Everyone realizes that since the internet was invented, the pulp mill outside my north window got mothballed thus saving x million trees from being cut down, further sequestering God knows only how much CO2, also creating a massive fire hazard in the next electrical storm? 1 more sink that never gets recognized

                        Comment


                          #36
                          If u can’t convince us CO2 is the problem now it’s another gas. Just the cost to eat I guess. I’m guessing Chuck is part of the end hunger campaign which the last time I checked is tough to do with not enuf food around. This brain dead scheme to tax us for something we can’t fix and which they don’t wanna fix will not go away until people go real hungry. These are problems people bitch about when their belly’s are full.

                          Comment

                          • Reply to this Thread
                          • Return to Topic List
                          Working...