Originally posted by Braveheart
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What do you guys make of this?
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
-
Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View PostIt may be entirely marketing by scare tactics and conspiracy theories, but our consumers believe it. This battle has already been lost. Science isn't going to win this debate. We need to protect glyphosate as a preseeding or post harvest tool, by eliminating its use in any application where it can result in residues. If not, we risk losing it entirely, regardless of what common sense or science might say.
Comment
-
We overlook the dose when we hear poison or chemical. Heard the same way these days.
I remember Korean exchange students who skinned every piece of fruit they touched or they wouldn't eat it.
Hard to explain to a consumer why a sprayer going just before harvest. So we will see limits or bans placed on an essential tool with no replacement.
Don Huber's work regarding micros and glyphosate, tossed together in a tin foil hat, boiled with a poor image and voila!
Shit sandwich.
Comment
-
Okay. Vape pens. Kids now can take the equivalent of a cigarette nicotine in one hit off a vape pen. Which can be as easily filled with THC. Omg the bogeyman weed. Why the **** are we getting all bent out of shape about tiny residues of glyphosate? You can almost drink the stuff full strength. It's salt. I am not going to go through the math again but I did in a prior post about the ****ing miniscule amounts of glyphosate you might get from a loaf of bread.
I'm a millionaire. Almost every farmer reading this site is as well. I'd rather be running a surf shop on a beach in maybe not Mexico now but I'd do great in Cuba. Push us. We'll leave and **** all you tree ****ing huggers.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tucker View PostOkay. Vape pens. Kids now can take the equivalent of a cigarette nicotine in one hit off a vape pen. Which can be as easily filled with THC. Omg the bogeyman weed. Why the **** are we getting all bent out of shape about tiny residues of glyphosate? You can almost drink the stuff full strength. It's salt. I am not going to go through the math again but I did in a prior post about the ****ing miniscule amounts of glyphosate you might get from a loaf of bread.
I'm a millionaire. Almost every farmer reading this site is as well. I'd rather be running a surf shop on a beach in maybe not Mexico now but I'd do great in Cuba. Push us. We'll leave and **** all you tree ****ing huggers.
Tucker, I have a restaurant in Cuba - hell of a deal.
Comment
-
Originally posted by pourfarmer View PostMy fruit? I'm a grain farmer
Enjoy your chemical romance, no escaping it, you're surrounded by it in every aspect of your life....unless you are living in the stone-age in a cave. Even your house is killing you!
You are living in a synthetic world whether you want to or not!!! You can't escape and are doomed.
You can escape it by "leaving early" and taking all the brainwashed cult members with you, Kool-aid anyone?
Comment
-
Originally posted by farmaholic View PostRead between the bloody lines. I assume he means the raw fruit and vegetables people are buying and consuming. "Chemicals and poisons" applied on these tender skinned and fleshy little "healthy" alternatives at every stage of development. Wash them to your heart's content, you won't wash off what's been absorbed either.
Enjoy your chemical romance, no escaping it, you're surrounded by it in every aspect of your life....unless you are living in the stone-age in a cave. Even your house is killing you!
You are living in a synthetic world whether you want to or not!!! You can't escape and are doomed.
You can escape it by "leaving early" and taking all the brainwashed cult members with you, Kool-aid anyone?
Comment
-
Yes unfortunately the consumer is always right, perception, fear, doubt...and they vote with their wallets too. 40 years ago I took a chem applicators class, instructor said what I believe best sums it all up, Dilute, dilute dilute and any poison is less deadly. That is all we do, No Chems are totally benign.
Comment
-
What I gathered so far;
The science is wrong. Roundup does NOT destroy gut bacteria that help us break down food into the chemicals our bodies require.
Chinese and Indian grown foods are not safe. (?)
Buy a 2nd sprayer, claims aren't proven, double up rate. (lol)
Chemical companies aren't honest, says poison right on the label.
Vape pens and weed are worse (?) if we can no longer spray roundup in crop or preharvest, farmers will leave the country which will results in mass famine.
Our environment is synthetic unless we live in a cave/stone age, because of this, the current way we use roundup is not a problem.
Because it is so heavily diluted, 540g per litre active and 10-15g per acre total applied, that is safe to ingest multiple times per day.
edit: There are only 1 way to grow food so future generations can eat, and it is the chemically dependant zero till model. Heavy tillage is required every time glyphosate is not used, depleting the topsoil via erosion.
Hope I didn't miss anything.
Thanks to everyone who took the time to express their critical thoughts.
Science is learning new things everyday, about the way our bodies work, soils work, and what 30 years of glyphosate usage has done to 'normal, non synthetic functions' of those systems. And the signs are not in favour of continued glyphosate use. Maybe now is a good time to start looking for that surf shop Tucker.Last edited by pourfarmer; Dec 13, 2018, 11:20.
Comment
-
Originally posted by pourfarmer View PostWhat I gathered so far;
The science is wrong. Roundup does NOT destroy gut bacteria that help us break down food into the chemicals our bodies require.
Chinese and Indian grown foods are not safe. (?)
Buy a 2nd sprayer, claims aren't proven, double up rate. (lol)
Chemical companies aren't honest, says poison right on the label.
Vape pens and weed are worse (?) if we can no longer spray roundup in crop or preharvest, farmers will leave the country which will results in mass famine.
Our environment is synthetic unless we live in a cave/stone age, because of this, the current way we use roundup is not a problem.
Because it is so heavily diluted, 540g per litre active and 10-15g per acre total applied, that is safe to ingest multiple times per day.
Hope I didn't miss anything.
Thanks to everyone who took the time to express their critical thoughts.
Science is learning new things everyday, about the way our bodies work, soils work, and what 30 years of glyphosate usage has done to 'normal, non synthetic functions' of those systems. And the signs are not in favour of continued glyphosate use. Maybe now is a good time to start looking for that surf shop Tucker.
Let's stick with addressing the Multiple uses of this chemical Independently of each other. Painting pre-seed, and pre Harvest with the same brush is Going to result in losing use of it for both purposes
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment