https://www.canada.ca/en/transportation-agency/news/2018/12/cn-and-cp-exceed-their-maximum-grain-revenue-entitlements-for-crop-year-20172018.html
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Hmmm... CN/CP grain ruling
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
Originally posted by dalek View Posthttps://www.canada.ca/en/transportation-agency/news/2018/12/cn-and-cp-exceed-their-maximum-grain-revenue-entitlements-for-crop-year-20172018.html
Taxes on taxes....downloaded to the primary producer....
-
The problem with the railways is simple...after the last consolidation was allowed by them saying efficiency gains would go producers ( which it never did) and freight rates would moderate.....all they did was keep raising rates and the CTA rubber stamped every one. ....without any performance guarantees....
Look ....our production has increased and the railways are not keeping pace...
500000 tonnes a week won't cut it for a 70MMT annual production....
Meanwhile every other major exporter in the world is outpacing our pathetic infrastructure builds...
Comment
-
Originally posted by bucket View PostThe problem with the railways is simple...after the last consolidation was allowed by them saying efficiency gains would go producers ( which it never did) and freight rates would moderate.....all they did was keep raising rates and the CTA rubber stamped every one. ....without any performance guarantees....
Look ....our production has increased and the railways are not keeping pace...
500000 tonnes a week won't cut it for a 70MMT annual production....
Meanwhile every other major exporter in the world is outpacing our pathetic infrastructure builds...
Comment
-
I hate the way it is worded.
Rate cap etc. Revenue cap
Very misleading to everyone.
I think it was designed that way on purpose.
You would think they only got paid to haul so much.
When what should be said , is thru their variable rates(which they wanted) they charged more than they should have.
Over the cap , over the cost plus formula. For rates
If Joe blow read the news , they would think the RRs
Only got paid to haul so much. Then nothing for volumes
Over that. So why should they haul more.
Just stupid
Comment
-
Originally posted by sawfly1 View PostI hate the way it is worded.
Rate cap etc. Revenue cap
Very misleading to everyone.
I think it was designed that way on purpose.
You would think they only got paid to haul so much.
When what should be said , is thru their variable rates(which they wanted) they charged more than they should have.
Over the cap , over the cost plus formula. For rates
If Joe blow read the news , they would think the RRs
Only got paid to haul so much. Then nothing for volumes
Over that. So why should they haul more.
Just stupid
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment