Originally posted by sumdumguy
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Nutrients in Fruits and Vegetables
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
Guest
-
Austranada, can you explain this paradox. If the problem is mining the soil of nutrients, how is a system which places arbitrary restrictions on replacing nutrients (or at least makes it much more difficult and expensive) going to improve the situation?
Comment
-
Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View PostAustranada, can you explain this paradox. If the problem is mining the soil of nutrients, how is a system which places arbitrary restrictions on replacing nutrients (or at least makes it much more difficult and expensive) going to improve the situation?
Comment
-
-
Guest
Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View PostAustranada, can you explain this paradox. If the problem is mining the soil of nutrients, how is a system which places arbitrary restrictions on replacing nutrients (or at least makes it much more difficult and expensive) going to improve the situation?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Austranada View PostCongratulations you appear to have attained liminality. Keep searching but go easy on all the assumptions
I told you before, if you want to market my products with a system in between the two that rewards sustainable practices, produces healthy products(provably, and distinguishably so), and is based on science not emotion, I am all in.
Comment
-
I don't understand why the government would not do a random nutritional analysis of the fruits and vegetables from 5 or 6 locations and brands across Canada every 8 or 10 years. I'm sure they have employees who would jump at the chance to get out from behind their desks.
Consumers would then have some idea if they were meeting their required daily nutritional needs. From the little bit of research I've done, some supplied by others on this site, it seems that the numbers have dropped by 20 to 70 percent depending on the vitamin or mineral tested. Maybe that's what the government and producers are concerned about, if consumers knew the actual numbers they would just say to hell with fruit and vegetables, much to the horror of Health Canada.
Comment
-
Guest
-
Originally posted by Austranada View Posthttp://www.ecofarmingdaily.com/soil-restoration-5-core-principles/
“ It is widely recognized that only 10-15 percent of fertilizer P is taken up by crops and pastures in the year of application. If P fertilizer has been applied for the previous 10 years, there will be sufficient P for the next 100 years, irrespective of how much was in the soil beforehand. Rather than apply more P, it is more economical to activate soil microbes in order to access the P already there. “
Comment
-
Originally posted by workboots View PostInteresting read. I agree with a lot of this, but I don’t understand this bit I found near the end of the article. Maybe someone can explain.
“ It is widely recognized that only 10-15 percent of fertilizer P is taken up by crops and pastures in the year of application. If P fertilizer has been applied for the previous 10 years, there will be sufficient P for the next 100 years, irrespective of how much was in the soil beforehand. Rather than apply more P, it is more economical to activate soil microbes in order to access the P already there. “
I tend to be very suspicious of anyone who thinks the laws of physics don't apply to them. Especially the first and second laws of thermodynamics.Last edited by AlbertaFarmer5; Jan 4, 2019, 23:59.
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View PostWell, thank you, I just learned something useful today. I had to look up the definition of liminality. But, sorry, it didn't just occur, I've been frustrated by conventional agricultures unwillingness to pay any premium for doing the right thing, and organics insistence on paying a premium only if you do all the wrong things.
I told you before, if you want to market my products with a system in between the two that rewards sustainable practices, produces healthy products(provably, and distinguishably so), and is based on science not emotion, I am all in.
Comment
-
Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View PostWell, thank you, I just learned something useful today. I had to look up the definition of liminality. But, sorry, it didn't just occur, I've been frustrated by conventional agricultures unwillingness to pay any premium for doing the right thing, and organics insistence on paying a premium only if you do all the wrong things.
I told you before, if you want to market my products with a system in between the two that rewards sustainable practices, produces healthy products(provably, and distinguishably so), and is based on science not emotion, I am all in.
IMO, nothing wrong with being in that phase or place and maybe even staying there, you don't have as far to go in either direction you want to travel(and maybe back), being ABSOLUTELY in one camp or the other and seeing no benefits of the other side....well that space is reserved for ZEALOTS!
Nice word though, thanks Austranada.
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment