• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

China, the other side of the moon!

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #13
    Originally posted by jazz View Post
    Funded health care in Canada will eventually have to go to some hybrid model. Maybe the US is ahead of the game here. Our system will eventually need private money as in the form of user fees or something to keep it going. That's what the US should look at. Like charge $100 or something for a doc office visit which are very common. That would have the average family contributing to the system on an affordable level. Then use those funds to prop up the big expensive operations nobody can afford that you might need once or twice a decade or something.
    Person I talked to from Russia says basic Medicare is covered but if you want decent service you gotta pay.

    Comment


      #14
      Remember Cold War days when we sold wheat to China.
      Wheat board and Alvin Hamilton in Diefenbaker government took part in arranging deal.
      Do not know why China had to buy on credit but it was part of deal.
      Likely did not endear us to US farmers who were struggling with surplus at time.
      Resulted in prosperity for our prairie farmers who were more wheat market dependent those days.

      Comment


        #15
        Back on topic, why would the Chinese land on the opposite side of the moon, Whats the point. Now we cant even confirm the landing with a telescope. We have the same images to look at like when Apollo landed 50 yrs ago. Looks like a studio hoax to me again.

        Comment


          #16
          Originally posted by jazz View Post
          Back on topic, why would the Chinese land on the opposite side of the moon, Whats the point. Now we cant even confirm the landing with a telescope. We have the same images to look at like when Apollo landed 50 yrs ago. Looks like a studio hoax to me again.
          Well we can sleep better knowing there isn't aliens hiding on the other side now.

          I wonder how do countries claim the moon surface? I would assume in the future people will possibly live in some sort of colony there and would also assume may be certain resources there?
          Diamonds gold? Something new possibly?
          Will it be first to inhabit?

          Comment


            #17
            Originally posted by the big wheel View Post
            I wonder how do countries claim the moon surface? I would assume in the future people will possibly live in some sort of colony there and would also assume may be certain resources there?
            Diamonds gold? Something new possibly?
            Something more valuable. Helium 3.

            Comment


              #18
              I wonder if they found a Nazi base and tanks of helium3. If you don’t get the joke look up iron sky.

              Comment


                #19
                Originally posted by bucket View Post
                Not sure about the excitement of the moon....do people actually believe people will live on the moon?????

                ****ing waste of money....
                Agree bucket sure good to land on moon when back in late sixties but no one is ever gonna live on the moon or mars waste of money.

                Comment


                  #20
                  Originally posted by malleefarmer View Post
                  Agree bucket sure good to land on moon when back in late sixties but no one is ever gonna live on the moon or mars waste of money.
                  Trump needs somewhere to dock his "space force" lol.

                  Comment


                    #21
                    Good place to send libtards!

                    Comment


                      #22
                      Going to the moon , I say good for them.
                      national pride.
                      And the tech advancements ,
                      Hard to measure.
                      I find it all fascinating

                      As for national debt in the US
                      Remember Obama,
                      a had to bail out the 08 crash
                      Handed from bush.
                      Right or wrong both parties were for it.

                      Now Trump has added 2 trillion debt. in the last 2 years.in good times no less.

                      Not a lot different is it.

                      Healthcare , we pay 60% of what the US pays , so I think we have room to step up , and improve things.
                      Even a user fee, simply to dissuade those overusing the system
                      Would be fine.
                      Last edited by sawfly1; Jan 3, 2019, 19:04.

                      Comment


                        #23
                        Originally posted by jazz View Post
                        Funded health care in Canada will eventually have to go to some hybrid model. Maybe the US is ahead of the game here. Our system will eventually need private money as in the form of user fees or something to keep it going. That's what the US should look at. Like charge $100 or something for a doc office visit which are very common. That would have the average family contributing to the system on an affordable level. Then use those funds to prop up the big expensive operations nobody can afford that you might need once or twice a decade or something.
                        Political suicide unless Trudeau does it and exempts specific groups. Only the white middle class will have to pay the $100 for doctor visit, That’s my guess.

                        Comment


                          #24
                          Originally posted by bucket View Post
                          Trudeau is doing the same thing to the people of Alberta....taking their money and knowing full well Alberta people are hurting and then using his adjustment of the Equalization formula to force feed Quebec the money from Alberta .....Billions sent to Quebec that could have been used by Alberta to build another pipeline and avoid both Alberta and Quebec....

                          Wally shouldn't have used up a couple billion on non revenue things like the stadium and the bypass...

                          What's the number in the last 2 years ...over 10 billion sucked out of saskatchewan and alberta for Quebec...


                          This should be the CBC headlines every day not whats happening in the White house ....

                          There is no way Notley should have gone along with Trudeau’s tax. Did she really think Trudeau would repay the favour?

                          Comment

                          • Reply to this Thread
                          • Return to Topic List
                          Working...