Good afternoon all, hope you are all doing well. Time for something a bit different, over the last 12 months, many people have asked me to address the issue of man made climate change.
Given time is one of those commodities that I don’t have much of in the spare sense, I haven’t been able to, but now, with the nonsense reaching fever pitch, it’s time to address it.
I have spent nearly 20 years researching this subject, after the big 1998 El Nino I wanted to find out if this was real given we broke modern temperature records.
I now have complied 3,000 graphs and hundreds of links to counter this alarmism, and want to share this so you too can use it as I am sure you encounter these nutcases daily.
The only way things are going to change is if we see a big push back form sceptics across social media, at the moment, all of the alarmist community are on Facebook and twitter spreading lies and misinformation.
The reason for this is they are getting very desperate, as they know we are about to start cooling in a big way, as the oceans begin their descent into the cooler phases for the next few decades.
Most of the alarmists crew on the internet are actually paid trolls,, funded by Getup, which in turned is funded by the Billionaire George Soros. This man is purely evil, and wants socialism to spread across the Western World.
This move has nothing to do with climate change, this is about taking from the middle class, and redistributing that wealth to poorer people, from all parts of the Earth.
And it’s also about the massive kickbacks a lot of people, including governments, get from the subsidies that you and I pay for with renewable energy.
No one denies climate changes, it changes regularly. But to say man made climate change is real, with not one skerick of evidence is a bridge too far.
So in this post, I will provide lots of evidence and links you can use to debate alarmists with on social media or anywhere really.
Here are few dots points to start.
1 – CO2 makes up 0.04% of the atmosphere, a tiny, harmless, odourless trace gas, and it makes up 3.6% of the greenhouse gases on Earth.
2 – Man contributes somewhere between 1 – 3 % of this tiny number through the emissions of fossil fuels, breathing, and living life.
3 – Oceans hold 1000 times the heat capacity fo the atmosphere, which means its hold 99% of the Earths thermal energy.
4- CO2 makes up 400 ppm, with every breath a human exhales 40,000 ppm, something no one wants to acknowledge as being a factor in rising Co2 levels.
5 – The oceans are the biggest storage of Co2, and as we go through warming episodes, CO2 comes out of the oceans, due to the CO2 being outgassed as water heats up slightly.
6 – Ocean cycles change every 30 years, and there is a good correlation between that and the temperature changes at the surface of Earth over the last 150 years.
7 – Baselines are the biggest part of the scam, we have to measure todays temps against a baseline period, we are supposed to use 1981-2010 as the 30 year period, only a few organisations in the world do.
8 – Organisations around the world, including the Bom, are routinely changing past temperatures, to try to keep today looking warmer than it really is.
9 – History shows Co2 and temperatures have no correlation, CO2 follows temperatures on every time scale, in the short term by 12 months, in the long term by 800 years.
10 – Ocean cycles last about 30 years, and the Pacific and Atlantic drive our weather pattern, and also our global temperatures, as they change phases, our weather changes too.
So, lets gets started, somewhere a while back, it was all about CO2 making temperatures rise on Earth. This was easily countered by sceptics showing oceans matched temperature changes through the historical record.
So, the biggest thing you can point out is the adjustments made to the dataset, these changes continue every month. When it comes to temperatures, there are 5 main datasets used.
They are – NASA GISS, HADCRUT, BEST, NCDC, and UAH. UAH is the satellite dataset, it uses satellites and measure temperatures across the entire globe from the ground up to a height of 8 kms.
The other 4 are using thermometers all over the world on land, and then infill the oceans with models. All 4 of these datasets also use the period 1951-1980 as their baseline, with the BOM using 1961 – 1990.
The reason for the using of this baseline is twofold, the first is the world was colder as the oceans were in the cold phases, which makes today look hot, and secondly, they can continue to adjust these temps before 1979, because there was no satellites to verify the temps back then.
After 1979, we launched satellites and they know they can’t adjust the data because it will differ greatly from reality, so this is how its kept somewhat under control. UAH also uses 1981-2010, which is the Works Meteorological organisation standard.
Of all the data tamperers, NASA is the worst.
Once upon a time, GISS used to have credible data, and showed temps falling for 30 years whilst CO2 was rising, until 1988, when everyone then realised that the world was warming.
So the scientists decided the best way to get funding was to get everyone to believe that it’s CO2 causing it, and we needed to study it.
So they have been working on this graph above, it has taken them a long time to achieve this, and it makes it look like temps are rising with CO2 the cause.
Notice this still shows the 1940-1976 cooling, something they are working hard to remove, but can only do so slowly, as they don’t want to make the adjustments obvious
And here are the adjustments that made this graph happen, since 2008, this is how much adjustments have made to the dataset.
All of the years before 1980 get a downward adjustment, and all of the years after 1980 get a slight adjustment towards. The way they do it is they have created a program that every month removes 0.01 degrees, which is why it has taken since 2008 to reach these levels, and create this scary looking graph.
They all do it, and get away with it, hoping no one notices, and also knowing that no one will report it. When someone says the planet is warming like near before, there are two things to point out.
NASA uses the wrong baseline, and if you you use 1981-2010, the warming is more than halved, and secondly, point out the data is heavily adjusted, especially before 1980.
Satellite temps are the gold standard, and use the right baseline of 1981-2010, and they show all of the warming and cooling without bias, because they measure up to 8 km high.
Every El niño spikes global temperatures, and this is because the temps follow the oceans with a lag time of about 3 – 6 months. You should point out that surface based datasets like NASA also picked up the Urban Heat Island effect, which is the cities getting larger and hotter.
This UAH measurements picks it all up, as it has no bias and measures everywhere, not just hot cities like surface thermometers.
Have a look above how well the Pacific Ocean, which measure with the PDO, matches up to the satellite temps, it’s almost a perfect match in trend line.
And then we have to read the dribble of alarmists who tell us there is no other fingerprint than humans causing the warming. The blue line is the oceans changing temperature, and the red line is the satellite temps, which follows the blue line.
The best site to see all these adjustments, and every dataset you will ever need, is climate for you, you can find it here.
It has everything from adjustments, solar cycle graphs, sea ice graphs, etc, it’s a total resource and has all of the datasets and all of the adjustments and tracks them every month.
This is the Atlantic ocean, we call this the AMO, and every thirty years or so it switches phase, and it’s about to switch into the next cooler phase.
Notice how strong the warming is in 1930s cycle, thats why the dust bowl trough was so bad across the globe, with scorching temps. Also, look at the period 1961 – 1990, see how cold the Atlantic was, this is why the BOM use use this baseline, because we are compering todays temps to that period, of course today will look warmer!
The Pacific is the same, this is the PDO, it too changes every 30 years, and you can see why we cooled after 1940, as it went much cooler for 30 years.
Use this graph to show why we cooled for 30 years when presented with NASAs heavily adjusted fake graph.
CO2 levels were 15 times higher than current levels 550 million years ago, and you can see form this graph they have no correlation with temperature.
450 million years ago, the Earths temperatures was 2.5 degrees colder than today, and yet CO2 was 4,000 parts per million, ten times higher than todays level.
In more recent times, the Vostok Ice Core samples from Antarctica also show CO2 following temps over the last 400,000 years.
One other inconvenience is that as water warms, it cannot hold as much CO2, which is why we see an increase in CO2 atmospheric concentration every time its heats up.
Up above you can see the graph showing water temperatures and the CO2 solubility, as water temps increase, the water cannot hold as much CO2 and has to outguess it out of the oceans.
And you can see that here on this graph above, there is a 12 month lag if you narrow it down to a shorter time scale. Anyone who says we are warming the oceans from man made CO2, use this graph above above and the water solubility graph s well, and they will of course not be able to come back with a a counter argument.
Whilst it is true CO2 is going into the oceans, it’s not enough to keep up with how much is going out, because the warmer waters can’t hold as much CO2.
Given time is one of those commodities that I don’t have much of in the spare sense, I haven’t been able to, but now, with the nonsense reaching fever pitch, it’s time to address it.
I have spent nearly 20 years researching this subject, after the big 1998 El Nino I wanted to find out if this was real given we broke modern temperature records.
I now have complied 3,000 graphs and hundreds of links to counter this alarmism, and want to share this so you too can use it as I am sure you encounter these nutcases daily.
The only way things are going to change is if we see a big push back form sceptics across social media, at the moment, all of the alarmist community are on Facebook and twitter spreading lies and misinformation.
The reason for this is they are getting very desperate, as they know we are about to start cooling in a big way, as the oceans begin their descent into the cooler phases for the next few decades.
Most of the alarmists crew on the internet are actually paid trolls,, funded by Getup, which in turned is funded by the Billionaire George Soros. This man is purely evil, and wants socialism to spread across the Western World.
This move has nothing to do with climate change, this is about taking from the middle class, and redistributing that wealth to poorer people, from all parts of the Earth.
And it’s also about the massive kickbacks a lot of people, including governments, get from the subsidies that you and I pay for with renewable energy.
No one denies climate changes, it changes regularly. But to say man made climate change is real, with not one skerick of evidence is a bridge too far.
So in this post, I will provide lots of evidence and links you can use to debate alarmists with on social media or anywhere really.
Here are few dots points to start.
1 – CO2 makes up 0.04% of the atmosphere, a tiny, harmless, odourless trace gas, and it makes up 3.6% of the greenhouse gases on Earth.
2 – Man contributes somewhere between 1 – 3 % of this tiny number through the emissions of fossil fuels, breathing, and living life.
3 – Oceans hold 1000 times the heat capacity fo the atmosphere, which means its hold 99% of the Earths thermal energy.
4- CO2 makes up 400 ppm, with every breath a human exhales 40,000 ppm, something no one wants to acknowledge as being a factor in rising Co2 levels.
5 – The oceans are the biggest storage of Co2, and as we go through warming episodes, CO2 comes out of the oceans, due to the CO2 being outgassed as water heats up slightly.
6 – Ocean cycles change every 30 years, and there is a good correlation between that and the temperature changes at the surface of Earth over the last 150 years.
7 – Baselines are the biggest part of the scam, we have to measure todays temps against a baseline period, we are supposed to use 1981-2010 as the 30 year period, only a few organisations in the world do.
8 – Organisations around the world, including the Bom, are routinely changing past temperatures, to try to keep today looking warmer than it really is.
9 – History shows Co2 and temperatures have no correlation, CO2 follows temperatures on every time scale, in the short term by 12 months, in the long term by 800 years.
10 – Ocean cycles last about 30 years, and the Pacific and Atlantic drive our weather pattern, and also our global temperatures, as they change phases, our weather changes too.
So, lets gets started, somewhere a while back, it was all about CO2 making temperatures rise on Earth. This was easily countered by sceptics showing oceans matched temperature changes through the historical record.
So, the biggest thing you can point out is the adjustments made to the dataset, these changes continue every month. When it comes to temperatures, there are 5 main datasets used.
They are – NASA GISS, HADCRUT, BEST, NCDC, and UAH. UAH is the satellite dataset, it uses satellites and measure temperatures across the entire globe from the ground up to a height of 8 kms.
The other 4 are using thermometers all over the world on land, and then infill the oceans with models. All 4 of these datasets also use the period 1951-1980 as their baseline, with the BOM using 1961 – 1990.
The reason for the using of this baseline is twofold, the first is the world was colder as the oceans were in the cold phases, which makes today look hot, and secondly, they can continue to adjust these temps before 1979, because there was no satellites to verify the temps back then.
After 1979, we launched satellites and they know they can’t adjust the data because it will differ greatly from reality, so this is how its kept somewhat under control. UAH also uses 1981-2010, which is the Works Meteorological organisation standard.
Of all the data tamperers, NASA is the worst.
Once upon a time, GISS used to have credible data, and showed temps falling for 30 years whilst CO2 was rising, until 1988, when everyone then realised that the world was warming.
So the scientists decided the best way to get funding was to get everyone to believe that it’s CO2 causing it, and we needed to study it.
So they have been working on this graph above, it has taken them a long time to achieve this, and it makes it look like temps are rising with CO2 the cause.
Notice this still shows the 1940-1976 cooling, something they are working hard to remove, but can only do so slowly, as they don’t want to make the adjustments obvious
And here are the adjustments that made this graph happen, since 2008, this is how much adjustments have made to the dataset.
All of the years before 1980 get a downward adjustment, and all of the years after 1980 get a slight adjustment towards. The way they do it is they have created a program that every month removes 0.01 degrees, which is why it has taken since 2008 to reach these levels, and create this scary looking graph.
They all do it, and get away with it, hoping no one notices, and also knowing that no one will report it. When someone says the planet is warming like near before, there are two things to point out.
NASA uses the wrong baseline, and if you you use 1981-2010, the warming is more than halved, and secondly, point out the data is heavily adjusted, especially before 1980.
Satellite temps are the gold standard, and use the right baseline of 1981-2010, and they show all of the warming and cooling without bias, because they measure up to 8 km high.
Every El niño spikes global temperatures, and this is because the temps follow the oceans with a lag time of about 3 – 6 months. You should point out that surface based datasets like NASA also picked up the Urban Heat Island effect, which is the cities getting larger and hotter.
This UAH measurements picks it all up, as it has no bias and measures everywhere, not just hot cities like surface thermometers.
Have a look above how well the Pacific Ocean, which measure with the PDO, matches up to the satellite temps, it’s almost a perfect match in trend line.
And then we have to read the dribble of alarmists who tell us there is no other fingerprint than humans causing the warming. The blue line is the oceans changing temperature, and the red line is the satellite temps, which follows the blue line.
The best site to see all these adjustments, and every dataset you will ever need, is climate for you, you can find it here.
It has everything from adjustments, solar cycle graphs, sea ice graphs, etc, it’s a total resource and has all of the datasets and all of the adjustments and tracks them every month.
This is the Atlantic ocean, we call this the AMO, and every thirty years or so it switches phase, and it’s about to switch into the next cooler phase.
Notice how strong the warming is in 1930s cycle, thats why the dust bowl trough was so bad across the globe, with scorching temps. Also, look at the period 1961 – 1990, see how cold the Atlantic was, this is why the BOM use use this baseline, because we are compering todays temps to that period, of course today will look warmer!
The Pacific is the same, this is the PDO, it too changes every 30 years, and you can see why we cooled after 1940, as it went much cooler for 30 years.
Use this graph to show why we cooled for 30 years when presented with NASAs heavily adjusted fake graph.
CO2 levels were 15 times higher than current levels 550 million years ago, and you can see form this graph they have no correlation with temperature.
450 million years ago, the Earths temperatures was 2.5 degrees colder than today, and yet CO2 was 4,000 parts per million, ten times higher than todays level.
In more recent times, the Vostok Ice Core samples from Antarctica also show CO2 following temps over the last 400,000 years.
One other inconvenience is that as water warms, it cannot hold as much CO2, which is why we see an increase in CO2 atmospheric concentration every time its heats up.
Up above you can see the graph showing water temperatures and the CO2 solubility, as water temps increase, the water cannot hold as much CO2 and has to outguess it out of the oceans.
And you can see that here on this graph above, there is a 12 month lag if you narrow it down to a shorter time scale. Anyone who says we are warming the oceans from man made CO2, use this graph above above and the water solubility graph s well, and they will of course not be able to come back with a a counter argument.
Whilst it is true CO2 is going into the oceans, it’s not enough to keep up with how much is going out, because the warmer waters can’t hold as much CO2.
Comment