• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

We Could Be Heading For A Mini Ice Age In 2030

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #25
    Originally posted by shtferbrains View Post
    I'm wonder if you read the "retraction"?

    The woman is an Astrophysics PhD doing ongoing research about the sun that many don't seem to want to hear about at this time.

    Unlike climate change the science is not all in.

    Can you imagine the "hate" she had to endure from social media crusaders when they saw that "click bait".

    All the "retraction" did was minimize the sensationalizing of the original headline.

    HER LIFE was proably on the line. The heat from ‘global warming’ has warped some brains.

    Comment


      #26
      Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
      Really! One piece of evidence can completely change the thousands if not millions of other pieces of current evidence that human caused climate change is real? If you believe that, then your understanding of science is limited.

      But hey, go ahead show us the one piece of evidence from a climate scientists that disproves human caused climate change. We are still waiting!
      It is worse than I thought, you truly have no concept of how the scientific method actually works do you? If consensus was all that was required for a theory to be written in stone, the world would still believe ( note, this is the word believe used in the correct context) in creationism, an earth centric universe, animicules, alchemy, witches, bad blood, global cooling, human sacrifice to appease gods etc. etc. Do you want a lesson in the scientific method, it may be a good place to start, without that basic knowledge, the rest of the discussion is very much pointless?

      To quote Einstein, Why 100 authors? If I were wrong, then one would have been enough!

      Comment


        #27
        Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
        But hey, go ahead show us the one piece of evidence from a climate scientists that disproves human caused climate change. We are still waiting!

        Climate skeptics aren't making nay claims therefore we have no burden of proof. We simple doubt the science and not enough definitive evidence has been put forth, nor has any of the past predictions born out, therefore the theory is suspect until a tangible prediction is made from it that is shown to be true. Statue of Liberty under water by now was one. Ice free arctic was another.

        Comment


          #28
          THEY think we NEED the 100 authors/97% of "climate" scientists to beat the LIE into us! All the doomsaying is really hard to "believe" without CONSTANT bombarding the public with another scary scenario. It is endless and so far NOTHING in 50 years Has come to pass! Hello little red hen...the sky NEVER fell!

          Comment


            #29
            Extremes for sure.

            Comment


              #30
              Originally posted by newguy View Post
              Extremes for sure.
              Those extremes are normal for the prairies. Those numbers were hit in the 30s and 60s too.

              Comment


                #31
                Originally posted by newguy View Post
                Extremes for sure.
                Thats just weather , and just on your fenceline lol

                Comment


                  #32
                  https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/02/190215092925.htm?fbclid=IwAR3cVzPKerWVubhxn_0gWiew MqjnasVDhNRYi3yeFUbI1DHBoPkyeQ6kTZE https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/02/190215092925.htm?fbclid=IwAR3cVzPKerWVubhxn_0gWiew MqjnasVDhNRYi3yeFUbI1DHBoPkyeQ6kTZE

                  Comment


                    #33
                    Originally posted by jazz View Post
                    Those extremes are normal for the prairies. Those numbers were hit in the 30s and 60s too.
                    This was not 30 years apart .exactly 6 months.thanks for helping me prove my point.

                    Comment


                      #34
                      Originally posted by newguy View Post
                      This was not 30 years apart .exactly 6 months.thanks for helping me prove my point.
                      The only point it proves, Is that if you define your parameters broadly enough to include all possible outcomes, then Every possible weather event can be used as proof of the theory.

                      Comment


                        #35
                        Cognitive bias. Extreme temps were hit in most places in Canada 75-90 yrs ago and yes some did happen within a few yrs of each other. Many records still untouched.

                        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_extreme_temperatures_in_Canada List of extreme temperatures in Canada

                        Comment

                        • Reply to this Thread
                        • Return to Topic List
                        Working...