• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

is the weather changing or 1961 all over again.

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
    https://science2017.globalchange.gov/chapter/13/
    The world’s oceans have absorbed about 93% of the excess heat caused by greenhouse gas warming since the mid-20th century, making them warmer and altering global and regional climate feedbacks. Ocean heat content has increased at all depths since the 1960s and surface waters have warmed by about 1.3° ± 0.1°F (0.7° ± 0.08°C) per century globally since 1900 to 2016. Under a higher scenario, a global increase in average sea surface temperature of 4.9° ± 1.3°F (2.7° ± 0.7°C) by 2100 is projected, with even higher changes in some U.S. coastal regions.

    The world’s oceans are currently absorbing more than a quarter of the CO2 emitted to the atmosphere annually from human activities, making them more acidic (very high confidence), with potential detrimental impacts to marine ecosystems. In particular, higher-latitude systems typically have a lower buffering capacity against pH change, exhibiting seasonally corrosive conditions sooner than low-latitude systems. Acidification is regionally increasing along U.S. coastal systems as a result of upwelling (for example, in the Pacific Northwest) (high confidence), changes in freshwater inputs (for example, in the Gulf of Maine) (medium confidence), and nutrient input (for example, in agricultural watersheds and urbanized estuaries) (high confidence). The rate of acidification is unparalleled in at least the past 66 million years (medium confidence). Under the higher scenario (RCP8.5), the global average surface ocean acidity is projected to increase by 100% to 150% (high confidence).
    That's nice.
    What do you see for next weekend?

    Comment


      #12
      Congratulations CHUCK2 and mustardman! Your last posts have elevated you to: Troll level 9.

      Only one more achievement level to go and you'll enter the Hall of Fame as level 10 super trolls! I'm so proud of you, as are all of your Agriville comrades.

      Please take the day to bask in this most prestigious achievement.

      It takes a special kind of individual to make it to level 9, but a few more arguements in favor of anthropogenic climate change, preferably tomorrow at the earliest, and dog gone it you'll make it to level 10!

      Keep up the good work gentlemen.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by helmsdale View Post
        Congratulations CHUCK2 and mustardman! Your last posts have elevated you to: Troll level 9.

        Only one more achievement level to go and you'll enter the Hall of Fame as level 10 super trolls! I'm so proud of you, as are all of your Agriville comrades.

        Please take the day to bask in this most prestigious achievement.

        It takes a special kind of individual to make it to level 9, but a few more arguements in favor of anthropogenic climate change, preferably tomorrow at the earliest, and dog gone it you'll make it to level 10!

        Keep up the good work gentlemen.
        These kind of posts will have the editor of the Country Guide phoning them and asking them for opinion pieces. 😂

        Another one to add to the ignore list.

        Comment


          #14
          All I can add is that I learned /learnt a new word....

          In my next career I want to be the guy that thinks up farm chemical names and words that make people look down their nose at you...

          the dumb****led farmer ..TM

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by mustardman View Post
            Question is, was the weather in 1961 changing?
            Article in “Nature” magazine that says anthropogenic climate started in the 1800’s due to industrial revolution
            Humans have made massive physical changes to the worlds landscape which also cause climate change. Break up all the grasslands and cut down all the forests and guess what happens. Then add in all the extra carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.

            Climate change occurs because of several factors. It would be hard to put a percentage of human caused climate change on a particular year. The most important evidence is in the trends. Natural variabilty still exists from year to year and season to season but the trends over long periods of time tell the story.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
              Humans have made massive physical changes to the worlds landscape which also cause climate change. Break up all the grasslands and cut down all the forests and guess what happens. Then add in all the extra carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.

              Climate change occurs because of several factors. It would be hard to put a percentage of human caused climate change on a particular year. The most important evidence is in the trends. Natural variabilty still exists from year to year and season to season but the trends over long periods of time tell the story.

              Nature is cutting down the trees right now by thunder storms and fire use to ravage the prairies every so often ...long before we were here...I think that's where some science loses it credibility....

              Comment


                #17
                Helmsdale.

                Nobody gives a shit whether you think I am a troll. You are wasting your time with your juvenile bullshit.

                Give us the evidence that all the climate scientists are wrong! Its simple. Provide the evidence. If you can't, then give up.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Give me a fn break. Maybe look up that research that was done which showed that the prairies have suffered droughts for tens of thousands of yrs some lasting as long as 30 yrs. And yes before we discovered oil. Unless all those native campfires were the problem.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by jazz View Post
                    Give me a fn break. Maybe look up that research that was done which showed that the prairies have suffered droughts for tens of thousands of yrs some lasting as long as 30 yrs. And yes before we discovered oil. Unless all those native campfires were the problem.
                    Interesting comment I never thought about before ...maybe the indigenous peoples were the start of climate change????? whoa that would start a thread hey?????

                    Someone started one of the fires up north according to the locals ......

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by jazz View Post
                      Give me a fn break. Maybe look up that research that was done which showed that the prairies have suffered droughts for tens of thousands of yrs some lasting as long as 30 yrs. And yes before we discovered oil. Unless all those native campfires were the problem.
                      There's no point arguing with a warmist. Blessed be those who believe for they shall inherit the media.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...