Arctic Is Melting

[chuckChuck]

Ok i said i wasnt gonna respond to any more of your bizarre posts but want to be clear i did NOT LIKE your ridiculous post !
One should not read while bouncing in the sprayer
Sorry AF , really enjoy your well researched informative posts
Wish you could retract an unintended like!

Don't worry everyone knows it had to be an error! LOL

And A5 does not provide well researched posts. Mostly opinion and mud slinging. He never provides science to backup his opinions. I have been waiting for a long time for any credible climate science but nothing ever shows up.

[jazz]

Don't worry everyone knows it had to be an error! LOL

And A5 does not provide well researched posts. Mostly opinion and mud slinging. He never provides science to backup his opinions. I have been waiting for a long time for any credible climate science but nothing ever shows up.

Lots of evidence being throw your way too chuck without any reasonable explanation.

lets check your models. Predicted in 2001, 4 deg temp increase by 2020. Statue of Liberty underwater, glaciers gone, pole melted, mass starvation. Your explanation?

We are backing the null hypothesis that there is no climate change. We don't have to do anything until one of your predictions comes true. Until then, its an off the wall theory.

[chuckChuck]

You need to learn the scientific method chuck. We are not the ones making the claim there we do not have provide one shred of evidence to the contrary. But the other side must provide solid evidence for their arguement backed by real world observations in order for their theory to be accepted. They have not done that. Models wrong, visual evidence contradicts. Your models should be impervious to our query. As you can plainly see the ice is still there.

If climate change was in a court room it would be tossed out for lack of evidence.

Really?? LOL

You are from another planet. NOAA, NASA, Environment Canada, the American Meterological Society all have the data and science to back up their claims. Wacko activist denial sites are full of fake news and political opinion. You might as well get your news from the National Enquirer.

Where is your evidence to the contrary? Frost in May. A cold February! That is not evidence or proof.

Your personal point of view and observations about global climate change are meaningless and would never be used in court.

[chuckChuck]

Lots of evidence being throw your way too chuck without any reasonable explanation.

lets check your models. Predicted in 2001, 4 deg temp increase by 2020. Statue of Liberty underwater, glaciers gone, pole melted, mass starvation. Your explanation?

We are backing the null hypothesis that there is no climate change. We don't have to do anything until one of your predictions comes true. Until then, its an off the wall theory.

Who said that? hahahaah Where do you get these fake predictions from? Statue of Liberty underwater! LMAO!

[sumdumguy]

Do brains melt like ice? Maybe they melted from watching too much Suzuki and Gore.

[newguy]

Lots of evidence being throw your way too chuck without any reasonable explanation.

lets check your models. Predicted in 2001, 4 deg temp increase by 2020. Statue of Liberty underwater, glaciers gone, pole melted, mass starvation. Your explanation?

We are backing the null hypothesis that there is no climate change. We don't have to do anything until one of your predictions comes true. Until then, its an off the wall theory.

so If that info is so credible why is no politician from any party jumping in with that?

[Guest]

Don't worry everyone knows it had to be an error! LOL

And A5 does not provide well researched posts. Mostly opinion and mud slinging. He never provides science to backup his opinions. I have been waiting for a long time for any credible climate science but nothing ever shows up.

i will f#$king decide for myself, who is credible , i still have that ability , thank you

[jazz]

Who said that? hahahaah Where do you get these fake predictions from? Statue of Liberty underwater! LMAO!

Those predictions are all courtesy of Mr Al Gore who has become a multi billionaire off climate bunk.

[samhill]

Again, many of us don’t deny the climate is or may be changing. It has done so many times before.

[HITTGrapevine]

Haha. All you guys make me laugh, speaking so definitively about climate change, as if you were experts on the topic. You remind me of blathering a Don Cherry, telling a national television audience before Game 7 of the Stanley Cup Final series that "There's no way Boston loses this game!"
Guess what Don. Boston did lose. And now you look like a buffoon, predicting the outcome of the event with such confidence. In reality, your predictions are a guess, with a 50-50 chance of being correct.

Maybe the global climate is changing due to human activity, and maybe its not. Scientists are formulating theories that will be proven or disproven over the course of history. But the debate will not be solved by a bunch of know-it-alls, spewing their opinions and invective through an on-line forum.

Sometimes it takes more courage and wisdom to acknowledge that you DON'T KNOW the answer to a question.

One more thing to consider — When asked about the existence of God, French mathematician Pascal said he couldn't prove definitively whether God exists or not. But he chose to belief in God's existence, based on the fact that the risks associated with denial (ie eternal damnation) were greater than the risks associated with belief (a commitment to worship and lead a virtuous life).

[jazz]

If climate change is real, then why are people building condos and homes in VC, NY, SF, LA, FL, SE? Shouldn't they be moving inland in case the ice caps do melt and swamp the coasts? Yeah because its all BS cash grab. If it were a real thing and real threat then we would be preparing for it. Progressive govts should be asking people in CA to move to Denver.

[Guest]

So many questions jazz , that the libtard climatards cant answer

[dmlfarmer]

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/17/climate/greenland-ice-sheet-melting.html?smid=fb-nytimes&smtyp=cur&fbclid=IwAR0PemcfNu4MzcNs0iSOE7d WRZNAYpKjhVWmneg_fVkAa-u7kBvHNG88LKM https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/17/climate/greenland-ice-sheet-melting.html?smid=fb-nytimes&smtyp=cur&fbclid=IwAR0PemcfNu4MzcNs0iSOE7d WRZNAYpKjhVWmneg_fVkAa-u7kBvHNG88LKM

[macdon02]

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/17/climate/greenland-ice-sheet-melting.html?smid=fb-nytimes&smtyp=cur&fbclid=IwAR0PemcfNu4MzcNs0iSOE7d WRZNAYpKjhVWmneg_fVkAa-u7kBvHNG88LKM https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/17/climate/greenland-ice-sheet-melting.html?smid=fb-nytimes&smtyp=cur&fbclid=IwAR0PemcfNu4MzcNs0iSOE7d WRZNAYpKjhVWmneg_fVkAa-u7kBvHNG88LKM

Kansas and Oklahoma temps

[tweety]

Actually Jazz, here is a good summary of all the models. Important thing to remember on predictions is how later policies change the climate as well. Things like banning halo gasses dramatically affect temps. While it's easy to say "Predictions are wrong" it's important to understand why they are off from predictions based on policy, social, end environmental changes. Had society never changed anything along the way, the models would have been accurate.

https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-how-well-have-climate-models-projected-global-warming https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-how-well-have-climate-models-projected-global-warming