Climate Change Puts Buildings, Coastlines, The North At Most Risk: Report Extreme wea

[furrowtickler]

Good discussion, I will just sit back and watch the debate 👍👍👍

[blackpowder]

Niels Bohr said: “Prediction is very difficult, especially if it’s about the future.”

[Guest]

well , the nice thing is that the horseshit is being revealed , thanks to mr trump, and the internet
very soon we will not be allowed to debunk glowbullshit warming horseshit online

[flea beetle]

If sea levels rise just 6 feet, 650 million people will be displaced globablly. Who is going to pay for all this relocation and the costs of adaptation? We know for sure no one is willing to see an increase in taxes to deal with climate change so where does the money come from Hamlock and Jazz if that is what we should be doing? Who funds research into adaptation you call for? You don't trust governments to do it, reading the posts it sounds like many feel all scientists are l on the take and fake the research, and big business are stealing all your profits so how are we know how to adapt. You think illegal immigration is bad today, wait until hundreds of millions of people lose their homes due to flooding and they have no where to go.

Are we at the point of no return as you claim I am stating? I don't know, that it why I have asked numerous times what the effect of our current CO2 levels will have on temperature, precipitation, and human society and not a single person has responded. You demand facts, well the fact is ever since man has walked the earth we have never had over 300ppm of CO2; a fact that is either lost on you or you choose to ignore. Jazz claims no problem because prehistoric levels were even higher, but what would society today look like on a world that has lost most of the current coastline? The prairies were a shallow inland sea that that time to. Another point lost on Jazz.

My greatest fear is if we continue to ignore and deny a very real problem, society is going to impose solutions that are possibly even worse than the problem.

You obviously never watched the links I provided

[furrowtickler]

You obviously never watched the links I provided

No most likely not . He is a confirmed climate scientist , so just here to preach and not look at two sides . Much like a few others lol

[Washout]

And science should never overrule democracy. Those example you gave all involve personal choice. I can choose not to use glyphosate if I think its dangerous. I can choose not to eat GMOs and I can choose what vaccines I want to take. I cannot choose to not contribute to a carbon tax that has no real end purpose. Your pseudo science should not override my free choice.[/QUOTE]

Well said jazz

[chuckChuck]

Don't expect the flat earthers to present any actual credible science or data from practicing climate scientist to back up their opinions.

I have asked for months and nothing appears except personal political opinion, personal attacks and a tidbit of pseudo science from denial sites and activists.

The anti-science denialists have no political leaders who pay attention to their illogical fantasies.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Don't expect the flat earthers to present any actual credible science or data from practicing climate scientist to back up their opinions.

I have asked for months and nothing appears except personal political opinion, personal attacks and a tidbit of pseudo science from denial sites and activists.

The anti-science denialists have no political leaders who pay attention to their illogical fantasies.

Chuck, I've been trying for months and months to teach you how the scientific method actually works, and some very basic math skills so we can have an intellectual conversation on this issue. You stubbornly keep retreating back to consensus, and models and the views of politicians(even in the above post, you somehow conflate the opinions of political leaders with evidence), and displaying an obvious disdain for anything requiring math. It is very frustrating, but I haven't yet given up.

[flea beetle]

Don't expect the flat earthers to present any actual credible science or data from practicing climate scientist to back up their opinions.

I have asked for months and nothing appears except personal political opinion, personal attacks and a tidbit of pseudo science from denial sites and activists.

The anti-science denialists have no political leaders who pay attention to their illogical fantasies.

And you never watched the links either...

[AlbertaFarmer5]

And you never watched the links either...

Now, why would they want to do that? When they already know all there is to know, and the science is settled?