ILTA is not a primary elevator. If they were you would have your check when you left the driveway. These processors are above the law when it comes to buying grain. Time for a change, most processors are bigger now than the primary elevators in the early 1900s
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Ilta Grain
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
AGT cold called one day ...I said how long to get a cheque if I deliver to you?....15 business days...that is close to a month...whats that about....
My response was I am not a bank...I don't finance guys that just received 110 million for fixing a used railway...I have my own shit to fix and will deal with guys that can issue a cheque when the slides are closed...
Comment
-
Vicki. Does the grain company actually have to have the funds set aside to cover the value of the bond or how is it supposed to work.
Comment
-
Originally posted by highwayman View PostVicki. Does the grain company actually have to have the funds set aside to cover the value of the bond or how is it supposed to work.Last edited by bucket; Jul 16, 2019, 09:53.
Comment
-
Originally posted by highwayman View PostVicki. Does the grain company actually have to have the funds set aside to cover the value of the bond or how is it supposed to work.
The funds are real.
The gap is the question. And uncovered commodities of course. In the past the gap was substantial but rules did tighten up, so we will see, once again how this system works, if it does.
I am merely pointing out, we've been here before several times in my career in the industry. Some of us worked for change and were shut down, farmers who opposed it then did not feel it was their responsibility to insure their own risk, and so here we are.
I support diversity, the industry needs diversity more now than ever, and so I advocate a relook by ag associations on what industry risk management looks like which commodities included, what process is used.
Headed to AIM, have a good day.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TASFarms View PostILTA is not a primary elevator. If they were you would have your check when you left the driveway. These processors are above the law when it comes to buying grain. Time for a change, most processors are bigger now than the primary elevators in the early 1900s
i meant to reply - not like.
As of July 11, 2019, the Canadian Grain Commission has suspended the licences of ILTA Grain Inc. of Surrey, British Columbia.
Comment
-
I bet that the bond will likely cover 80-90% of qualified outstanding producer payments. Those with deferred cheques for any commodity and those with canary seed will not be covered by CGC bond.
Since FCC and HSBC are secured creditors from the assets, they will take whatever proceeds come from sales and collection but will not be made whole. Everyone on that creditor list that does not qualify for CGC bond will get $0. From railways to broker, to deferred lentil cheques to canary seed producers to the local paper that are all owed money, $0 will be paid out.
Also the $31 million of inventory Ilta claims to have in the court filings is BS. Even at a generous valuation of 30 cents/lb that equals around 47,000T. Not a chance they have anywhere near that inventory. Inflated stocks or overvalued stocks or likely both
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kraut View PostI bet that the bond will likely cover 80-90% of qualified outstanding producer payments. Those with deferred cheques for any commodity and those with canary seed will not be covered by CGC bond.
Since FCC and HSBC are secured creditors from the assets, they will take whatever proceeds come from sales and collection but will not be made whole. Everyone on that creditor list that does not qualify for CGC bond will get $0. From railways to broker, to deferred lentil cheques to canary seed producers to the local paper that are all owed money, $0 will be paid out.
Also the $31 million of inventory Ilta claims to have in the court filings is BS. Even at a generous valuation of 30 cents/lb that equals around 47,000T. Not a chance they have anywhere near that inventory. Inflated stocks or overvalued stocks or likely both
Comment
-
Originally posted by westernvicki View PostEach company is evaluated individually, for the bond, a bond is posted based on financial capacity.
The funds are real.
The gap is the question. And uncovered commodities of course. In the past the gap was substantial but rules did tighten up, so we will see, once again how this system works, if it does.
I am merely pointing out, we've been here before several times in my career in the industry. Some of us worked for change and were shut down, farmers who opposed it then did not feel it was their responsibility to insure their own risk, and so here we are.
I support diversity, the industry needs diversity more now than ever, and so I advocate a relook by ag associations on what industry risk management looks like which commodities included, what process is used.
Headed to AIM, have a good day.
But as I said I cannot see why there isn’t a requirement for them to put money in a fund that is allocated to purchases. Once it’s rhere make your contracts for x amount of grain and that’s what your allowed to buy. No creditors or other liabilities should factor into this.
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment