Goldman Sachs analysis of the impact of climate change. The result are terrifying

[jazz]

Wow we had ocean temp monitoring buoys back in 1880, amazing.

So the models are bogus and we don't need them so we can just look at the weather channel to tell the earth is being cooked to a cinder as I look at a couple inches of snow on my driveway. Everybody and their dog knows 5 yrs in the 80s and most of the 1920s have all the temp high records no matter how hard the gov tries to delete them. They have the records on the news at night. Do you have TV?

Chuck is the IPCC now the go to organization now that you have disavowed NASA? Just let me know and I will send a spear through the heart of that corrupt organization next post.

[fjlip]

The industrial activities that our modern civilization depends upon have raised atmospheric carbon dioxide levels from 280 parts per million to 400 parts per million in the last 150 years. The panel also concluded there's a better than 95 percent probability that human-produced greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide have caused much of the observed increase in Earth's temperatures over the past 50 years.

I thought the problem was CARBON! You moron, CARBON, TURDO/MCKENNA, CARBON CARBON !

[rumrocks]

Chuck-

I'm somewhat of a skeptic for what I believe are good reasons concerning weather extremes . . .

Why do the extremers only use partial graphs or selected periods of history when justifying their
arguments.

Why are a large number of temperature stations in cooler areas being eliminated.

Why is Nasa softening their position on weather extremes.

Why do they consider a warmer climate bad, at least one time in the past, palm trees grew in
Wyoming.

Ocean levels seem to be stable, not rising

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/12/02/history-falsifies-climate-alarmist-sea-level-claims/ https://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/12/02/history-falsifies-climate-alarmist-sea-level-claims/

The optics of this whole movement are bad, the main reason why there are so many deniers, you can't
blame them.

I am not a ridged person when it comes to new ideas and absorbing knowledge, but on occasion I see
sleazy salesmanship and this being one.

I'm not saying that burning fossil fuel isn't having negative effects on air quality, that's a given, but as
for changing weather patterns world wide, I'd put the probability at maybe 2 to 5 per cent.

Whats your best guess.

[Guest]

again , how in **** is it possible that there is any liberal supporters in western canada , let alone a western canada farmer
its baffling to me ???

[Guest]

it sure is fun watching these desperate ****heads trying to pass this shit onto us
like a dog chasing its tail
the gig is up scammers

[fjlip]

again , how in **** is it possible that there is any liberal supporters in western canada , let alone a western canada farmer
its baffling to me ???

After the COLDEST SHITTIEST growing season in many years, HOW THE F CK is any farmer type a CLIMATE CULT BELIEVER?????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????
Get a brain, step outside freezing our ASSES off! Snow all over hell!

[jazz]

Let me tell you how you will know if climate change is real. When for 5 years those shoulder months in Canada are trimmed back by 60 days - April and October. That means above zero temps night and day.

That happens and I will kneel at the climate change altar.

[furrowtickler]

Goldman sucks is just waiting to cash in on the gullible....


The gig is getting exposed more every day 👍

[handful]

Goldman sucks is just waiting to cash in on the gullible....


The gig is getting exposed more every day 👍

Red October