Coalition

[farmaholic]

That question is not an option. There are forces baked into our society that will be impossible to turn back. Best we can do is hang on.

[ATTACH]5127[/ATTACH]

Kids....

We replaced ourselves and had one extra kid.
Although there is still "live ammunition in the rifle", it's now only for target practice.
Up to my kids to maintain or grow the population now.
Too many zero, one and two kid families, that's not population growth let alone sustaining it.
Enter immigration....., and we wonder why?
Lifestyle of child bearing people means more to them than creating and nurturing new life.
Economics? Change the lifestyle.
Affluence has it's drawbacks, need two incomes to live? Everyone needs to be an autonomous island, dependant on no one, so daycare can raise the kids and careers pursued. Today's reality.

A culture succumbing to it's own "success"!

Not sure what that has to do with a "coalition", but I guess lots when you consider it cooperation between two entities to a common goal! Maybe something the Canadian people should be thinking about in regards to this Country.....have an even better Country to live in and the rest might take care of itself. Not divisiveness, and when leaders can't even unite a country how will everyday people.

[rumrocks]

is that rifle still a .308 or a pellet gun that shoots hollow point.

[6V53]

Kids....

We replaced ourselves and had one extra kid.
Although there is still "live ammunition in the rifle", it's now only for target practice.
Up to my kids to maintain or grow the population now.
Too many zero, one and two kid families, that's not population growth let alone sustaining it.
Enter immigration....., and we wonder why?
Lifestyle of child bearing people means more to them than creating and nurturing new life.
Economics? Change the lifestyle.
Affluence has it's drawbacks, need two incomes to live? Everyone needs to be an autonomous island, dependant on no one, so daycare can raise the kids and careers pursued. Today's reality.

A culture succumbing to it's own "success"!

Not sure what that has to do with a "coalition", but I guess lots when you consider it cooperation between two entities to a common goal! Maybe something the Canadian people should be thinking about in regards to this Country.....have an even better Country to live in and the rest might take care of itself. Not divisiveness, and when leaders can't even unite a country how will everyday people.

One spouse works to make a living one spouse works to pay the taxes, maybe better off just make kids and collect a cheque from the government.

[Oliver88]

What could go wrong with a ultra-leftist coalition?

[walterm]

Isn't the CPC born of a coalition ? Did it turn out so bad we should be afraid of another one?

[farmaholic]

Isn't the CPC born of a coalition ? Did it turn out so bad we should be afraid of another one?

Didn't they present that coàlition to the electorate to vote for....not some rag-tag coalition to form a government after an election?, in which after a defeat the coalition parties go their own way?

[Oliver88]

Isn't the CPC born of a coalition ? Did it turn out so bad we should be afraid of another one?

Do you think Trudeau, with Singh as finance minister and possibly May as environment minister would be devastating for the country?

What would they do for the GDP of Western Canada?

[GALAXIE500]

Conservatives made a huge mistake by putting Scheer in there .
A smart educated woman would have moped the floor with a landslide win

Rona Ambrose would have been good in this spot , but.....

[LEP]

Isn't the CPC born of a coalition ? Did it turn out so bad we should be afraid of another one?

If the three leaders want to join and run as one party that would be legitimate. IMO.

Simply start the campaign pledging that they would form a coalition government would be a close second. But to deny they are going to form one ahead of the vote and quickly assemble one after is more lies.

[GDR]

What about the cons and libs working togeather. That may be better for the country than giving the swing vote to the greens or NDP. It's hard to admit if you support either cons or libs but reality is they really aren't that different on core policies, cons just marginally better with tax dollars. Anyone who thinks there is a right of center political choice in this country is sadly mistaken.

[sumdumguy]

Canada would look like a tire with a gaping hole in the middle if Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba sent their allegiances south. I could see Trump putting a trunk line right about Drumheller. There-landlocked no more!

[littledoggie]

What about the cons and libs working togeather. That may be better for the country than giving the swing vote to the greens or NDP. It's hard to admit if you support either cons or libs but reality is they really aren't that different on core policies, cons just marginally better with tax dollars. Anyone who thinks there is a right of center political choice in this country is sadly mistaken.

They may not be that different right now, but we just lived through 4 years of a far-left liberal government. And now they take a step to the center?