• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What could Andrew scheer have done different?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Subject: Fwd: Trudeau's list of "accomplishments"...

    these along and everyone remember them all on Election Day.


    -SNC- Lavalin Scandal. Putting Adm. Norman on trial and then interfering in the process. Interfering in the appointment of a Supreme Court Judge

    -Highest Spending PM outside of war and recession. Gave $18.6 billion of Canadian money to other countries.

    -Imposes a bullshit carbon tax and climate changes policies that chases investors out of Canada.

    -Adds GST to the carbon tax, that’s a tax on a tax. How is that possible?

    -He pledged $840 million to Syria Humanitarian Assistance when half the native reserves don’t have clean drinking water.

    -Blames all problems in the government on our previous prime minister Steven Harper, and can’t take responsibility for his own governments actions. Even when it happened before Harper was elected PM.

    -He insist we use Peoplekind instead of mankind.

    -Veterans are asking for too much but gives millions away to other countries.

    -Said that male construction workers have a negative affect in rural communities and they suffer when working on a infrastructure project. Meaning ****?

    -Compared returning ISIS terrorists to Italian immigrants and says they will be an extraordinary powerful voice for Canada.

    -Says Terrorists deserve to keep their Canadian citizenship.

    -Billions added to the national debt.

    -Says the budget will balance itself by 2019. It did not, new predictions say 2040.

    -Says Ummm errr ummm ahhhh ummmm ummm a lot.

    -Says if we kill our enemies they win.

    -Canada has no core identity.

    -Says “diversity is our greatest strength” but his divisiveness tears us apart.

    -Wearing Indian wedding clothes on trip to India which the Indian people say is too much and is embarrassing Bollywood dancing.

    -Gets India to invest $250 million in Canada but we have to invest $750 million in India first.

    -Spent over $1.5 million on the trip to India that did nothing but worsen ties.

    -Paid $17,000 to bring Vikram Vij a chef from Vancouver to prepare a meal for a meeting in New Delhi.

    -Invited Jaspal Atwal a Khalistani terrorist to India, which sparked negative attention with their media.

    -Can’t get a trade deal done with anyone.

    -Couldn’t negotiate NAFTA.

    -Can’t get a pipeline done in any direction.

    -Takes more selfies than a class of teenage girls.

    -Withholds documents regarding interference in government contracts.

    -Replaces Canada’s old F-18s with Australia’s old F-18s.

    -Waves to an empty tarmac when boarding the government plane.

    -His love of all things Castro and all things Red China.

    -Imposes tough regulations and taxes on oil from Alberta, Saskatchewan and Newfoundland but not oil from Saudi Arabia, Venezuela or Nigeria.

    -Every new project has to undergo strict environmental assessments...except cement plants in Quebec.

    -Thinks old stock Canadians should be replaced.

    -Chases foreign companies (and their investment capital) out of the country like they have the plague.

    - Changes made in our national anthem.

    -Brings in 10s of thousands of unemployable “refugees”.

    -Ibrahim Ali , a Syrian refuge brought in by Justin Trudeau’s immigration polices ****D AND KILLED Canadian 14 year old Marissa Shen.

    -Tweets out a welcome to 10s of thousands more fake refugees from the US (even gets the RCMP to be their bellhops).

    -All his fake refugees get better healthcare than Canadians do, while they put a strain on all our public services and contribute little.

    -Illegal migrants are just “irregular border crossers”.

    -Thinks we should thank Muslim refugees for moving to Canada.

    -Pays $10.5 million to a CONVICTED terrorist in a backroom deal who murdered an unarmed US Army medic and blinded another soldier.

    -Gave away another $30 million to 3 other terrorists.

    -Forgot Alberta was a province.

    -Called small business owners “tax cheats”.

    -Taxes cow farts.

    -Screws up our trade relations with our most important trade partner because he failed to stop Chinese steel from flowing through to the states and he won’t give up supply management which hurts Canadian consumers.

    -$8 million for a skating rink on Parliament Hill that was used for 3 weeks.

    -$4.5 billion for a 65 year old pipeline (and KM uses that money to build a pipeline in Texas). Was told by experts it’s not wise to buy the KM pipeline but he bought it anyway.

    -Kokanee groper.

    -Thinks Canada is 100 years old instead of 150.

    -Generally making life less affordable for the average Canadian.

    -Gave $600 million of Canadian taxpayer’s money to the Clinton Foundation.

    -Gave $351 million of Canadian taxpayer’s money to Hamas.

    -Introduces a law that would make calling someone by the wrong gender pronoun a criminal offence.

    -Outrage over fake racist attacks, says nothing about real terrorist attacks and won’t acknowledge terrorist attacks.

    -His Liberal party Voted NO on sending Tori Stanford’s killer back to jail, instead sent her to a healing lodge.

    -Legalization of weed??? His only election promise that he has fulfilled which took 3 years and was botched badly.

    -The only sitting PM ever to be convicted of ethics violations.

    -Continuously uses identity politics.....then complains about identity politics.

    -Apologies for things that happened before Canada was a country or decades ago, even when it has nothing to do with him. Sheer shouldn’t had to do anything, the iq of voters was shown in this election.

    Comment


      #17
      skfarmer707....

      Then there must be something wrong with enough of the electorate for the Clown to continue to run his circus.

      As I mentioned before, the Clown only got 52% of the votes in his riding, yea that's alot more than any one other candidate in the riding, but add up the votes for all the other candidates and in my opinion he didn't do that well!

      Some of the Sask Conservative ridings were resounding wins, geez you would think that if you had the PM in your riding there would be overwhelming support for him!

      Comment


        #18

        Comment


          #19
          His big mistake was listening to the idiots who told him to attack Trudeau at the debate. All he had to do was answer the questions asked and show Canada the Consevative policies. He was ahead untill that point and went downhill until election day.

          Comment


            #20
            Thinking there were enough people who gave a shit about the economy. That the majority of the people realize the importance of fiscal responsibility. Instead the majority are out to get whatever they can, free child care, free pharmacare, pay no taxes, save the planet at any cost...... Or more accurately copies of Trudeau.

            Comment


              #21
              Originally posted by 15444 View Post
              When you realize that people in Toronto and Quebec regards people in the West as uneducated savages that need to be told how things are supposed to work, you will realize why the West will always be 2nd class and needs to separate.

              I lost track of how many times MSM referred to Conservatives as the party for uneducated people.
              THIS IS A VERY TRUE STATEMENT!! Don’t worry about the west hating the east as being a bad thing....the truth is THE EAST HAS HATED THE WEST FOREVER!!

              I have relatives in the east who came to visit each summer and called us peasants in the 1960’s and when we started making some money in the 70’s they got pissed at our progress and quit coming out!

              And we let this ideology govern our country! Wow we really are dumb!

              Comment


                #22
                [QUOTE=Crestliner;428615]THIS IS A VERY TRUE STATEMENT!! Don’t worry about the west hating the east as being a bad thing....the truth is THE EAST HAS HATED THE WEST FOREVER!!

                I have relatives in the east who came to visit each summer and called us peasants in the 1960’s and when we started making some money in the 70’s they got pissed at our progress and quit coming out!

                And we let this ideology govern our country! Wow we really are dumb![/

                Agree, eastern cousins, city relates, were happier when farmer were crap, when we had more they were jealous!

                Comment


                  #23
                  The ignorance and disdain of eastern Canadians towards western Canada is often matched or exceeded by the disdain and ignorance of western Canadians towards eastern Canada.

                  This often comes from people who hold their self interests above what is good for the whole country and their community.

                  Politicians love to play this game because it delivers power.

                  Case in point. Scott Moe did not mention equalization during the election campaign because he knew that Andrew Scheer cannot win votes in Quebec if Conservatives from the west demand large reforms to equalization. But after the election suddenly it is a big issue and Trudeau is too blame. Pure politics.

                  Scott Moe grew up in a province that was the beneficiary of equalization payments for many years. I guess that wasn't a problem then.

                  Harper had chance to change equalization but chose only to tinker with it. Yes there is room to change it. But the principle behind equalization are sound..

                  Yes Alberta needs help but it needs to help itself as well. Norway had a plan for when the boom goes bust. Alaska has a plan as well. The secret is not to spend all your one time resource revenues and let oil companies take excess profits when times are good and then ask to be bailed out when oil and gas prices drop.

                  It takes leaders with an attitude of fiscal restraint and the guts to standup to the oil industry. Alberta had had neither since Peter Loughheed.
                  Last edited by chuckChuck; Oct 24, 2019, 08:15.

                  Comment


                    #24
                    Scheer could have played a different clip of Trudeau's arrogance everyday...

                    1. Trudeau came from a privileged upbringing so he didnt realize he couldn't grab any women's ass that he felt like.

                    2. The Indian dance...

                    3. The globe and mail article was false then played the ethics commissioners findings...

                    4. Paper box thingy ...over and over...

                    5. His two jets across the country and where the money went that he said he paid for offsets....

                    6. Scheer could have admitted he was actively trying to demonize Bernier....and honestly why would Scheer hire A liberal to do it....he had to have known Kinsella would have played that chip eventually...FFS

                    Comment


                      #25
                      RESIGN
                      Your question Forum What could Andrew scheer have done different? RESIGN HE IS NOT A CANADIAN Sheers only real job is an MP.

                      Comment


                        #26
                        Originally posted by Integrity_Farmer View Post
                        RESIGN
                        Your question Forum What could Andrew scheer have done different? RESIGN HE IS NOT A CANADIAN Sheers only real job is an MP.
                        like times 8

                        Comment


                          #27
                          I assume chuck is referred to the heritage fund. Good news its up to over $600B now. Quebec and the maritimes are just holding it for us. That was sure nice of them. Maybe we could tap into it now.

                          Comment


                            #28
                            Originally posted by jazz View Post
                            I assume chuck is referred to the heritage fund. Good news its up to over $600B now. Quebec and the maritimes are just holding it for us. That was sure nice of them. Maybe we could tap into it now.
                            You must be confused.

                            Give up the mythology that Alberta was prevented from putting lots of resource revenues into the heritage fund because of the equalization program.

                            Equalization is paid out of federal taxes that are applied equally across Canada. Alberta pays more federal taxes because their incomes are higher than average along with their per capita GDP.

                            The heritage fund is up to Alberta alone. Or Alaska alone. Or Norway. Alberta chose to keep royalties low rather than collect sufficient royalties to build a sizable heritage fund.

                            It has nothing to do with the Federal Government management of provincial resources revenues.
                            Last edited by chuckChuck; Oct 24, 2019, 10:34.

                            Comment


                              #29
                              Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
                              Equalization is paid out of federal taxes that are applied equally across Canada. Alberta pays more federal taxes because their incomes are higher than average along with their per capita GDP.
                              F that BS. That's a cop out. Ab pays higher fed tax because we are developing our resources which are unshielded from the formula like hydro revenues. F even MB got a payment under that formula because hydro. So its a disincentive welfare payment to the east to not try to improve their economy.

                              Stop with your obtuse rewriting of the plain facts.

                              Comment


                                #30
                                https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-votes-2019-equalization-payments-provinces-kenney-1.5281736

                                Bringing clarity to the sometimes murky world of equalization payments

                                Federal government transfers funds to provinces so every Canadian receives comparable services
                                CBC News · Posted: Sep 12, 2019 7:08 PM ET | Last Updated: September 12

                                There is confusion around Canada's equalization payment program. But it is designed so that every Canadian, no matter where he or she lives, would receive comparable services at comparable rates of taxation. (Graeme Roy/The Canadian Press)

                                It seems like every time a federal election rolls around, there are complaints about equalization payments. Sometimes, it doesn't even take a federal election. Some premiers try to use it as leverage in their fights with Ottawa.

                                But there is confusion about what equalization payments actually are, who pays them, and why.
                                A brief history

                                Canada's equalization program has existed since 1957. It was brought in as a way for the federal government to transfer funds to provinces so that every Canadian, no matter where he or she lived, would receive comparable services at comparable rates of taxation.

                                So a Canadian living in a smaller province with a weaker economy would have access to the same public services as one living in a fiscally stronger province, without their tax rates having to go through the roof.

                                Equalization was enshrined in the Constitution in 1982.

                                There is a separate program for the territories.
                                Who actually pays?

                                Not the provinces. Not provincial governments. According to the Library of Parliament, "Equalization is financed entirely from government of Canada general revenues" raised through federal taxes on all Canadians.

                                In plainer terms: equalization is funded by the federal government from its general revenue, raised through federal taxes, paid for by all Canadians.

                                Here is how economist Trevor Tombe, of the University of Calgary's School of Public Policy, describes it in an article he wrote in 2018:

                                Equalization is a federal program that transfers federal funds to provinces with below-average capacities to raise revenues. Provinces with stronger economies, and with high income households and businesses, raise more revenue for any given tax rate than provinces with lower incomes.
                                What is the 'equalization formula'?

                                As Tombe alludes to, a province's fiscal capacity is determined by how much revenue a province could generate if all provinces had identical tax rates — not how much it does raise.

                                "This captures a province's "ability" to raise revenue, and is almost entirely due to a province's underlying economic strength," Tombe explained in an email to CBC News. "Provinces with strong economies (like Alberta, B.C. and Ontario) can more easily raise revenues than provinces with weaker economies (like [the] Maritimes or Quebec)."

                                According to Tombe, almost all provincial revenue sources are included in the calculation.

                                But again, no provincial government is paying equalization to another province.
                                Have some provinces always received payments?

                                Every province has received a payment under equalization since the program started in 1957, says Tombe. "Alberta last received a payment in 1964. Ontario never received any payment until the financial crisis… [and] it received payments from 2009 to 2018."

                                Tombe notes that the 1957-1966 version of equalization bears little resemblance to what we consider equalization today. So, in that sense, Alberta has never received a payment in the history of equalization as we know it today.
                                Who receives equalization today?

                                For 2019-2020, the following provinces will receive equalization:

                                Prince Edward Island
                                Nova Scotia
                                New Brunswick
                                Quebec
                                Manitoba

                                These provinces will not:

                                Newfoundland and Labrador
                                Ontario
                                Saskatchewan
                                Alberta
                                British Columbia

                                Comment

                                • Reply to this Thread
                                • Return to Topic List
                                Working...