Oct 28 Harvest report

[AlbertaFarmer5]

no one has erased the medieval warm period. Pure BS. And any credible climate scientist will tell you that climate is affected by BOTH natural and human influences.

And when you start the new thread, perhaps you can quantify the natural vs man mad, according to the official record?

[fjlip]

And when you start the new thread, perhaps you can quantify the natural vs man mad, according to the official record?

Aw come on, got him/them "over another barrel"! Quick cook up more lies fake news we MUST accept as GOSPEL from the church of Climate Cult...to the hundredth of a degree world wide measured every second of every day for hundreds of years!

[seldomseen]

Math fact: you do not need a record high to have a higher average! So simply predicting what the average yearly temperature will be on whether or not there was a single day record set in any location is not valid, only an attempt at dis information.

Common sense fact: It would be impossible to set a record high for a Month when ever day of that Month the temp was below normal!

[jazz]

Please dml, I hate to embarrass a fellow farmer.

Here is the geologic record of CO2 and Temp. Can you see the point where humans entered the system?

There is no correlation between CO2 and temp, nor between humans and CO2 levels.

[flea beetle]

Please dml, I hate to embarrass a fellow farmer.

Here is the geologic record of CO2 and Temp. Can you see the point where humans entered the system?

There is no correlation between CO2 and temp, nor between humans and CO2 levels.

[ATTACH]5174[/ATTACH]

Oh come on JAZZ. You can clearly see that the results are skewed by the way the chart is formatted. Any Government paid scientist with an agenda could see that. Show me proof from a source that I approve of.***

[dmlfarmer]

Please dml, I hate to embarrass a fellow farmer.

Funny, you have no problem embarrass yourself with most of what you post. Presenting a 4,600 million year time chart and expecting the last couple hundred years to be identifiable is laughable. I have posted the following chart a number of times and I have yet to have you or any other denier able to tell me the impact of CO2 levels that have never been this high in 800,000 years, through both ice ages and warm interglacial periods will have on temperatures. The best you can come up with is they were that high 20-50 million years ago when the prairies were an inland sea. The chart also clearly indicates that the rapid increase, and deviation of CO2 historical cycles happened at the same time as fossil fuel usage was widely adopted and increased.

[flea beetle]

Wow...I wasn’t far off.

[TASFarms]

Why argue about co2. It’s a scam. Bam!

[jazz]

I have posted the following chart a number of times and I have yet to have you or any other denier able to tell me the impact of CO2 levels that have never been this high in 800,000 years, through both ice ages and warm interglacial periods will have on temperatures. .

Well you never asked me. The answer is none. There is no correlation over any time period. exactly like the measurements from the past few decades have shown.

[fjlip]

Climate Emergency all over the place! What emergency? Who is DYING of too hot? What would immediately prevent the emergency/dying if any somewhere? Wave a magic TAX wand, sacrifice a virgin?Yes, answer what is the human caused portion of 0.4% of our air? Like a sliver of a percent. Oh that will f cking kill us all! CO2 is NOT deadly, not the only factor in any climate influence, why pick CO2? Oops call it CARBON to baffle the idiot uninformed irrational non reasoning public. Real sad so many can't think.

[mbratrud]

Where the phuck is the global warming everyone has been bitching about??????

Carbon tax is already working! Yay Liberals! Reply With Quote

[furrowtickler]

So you done harvest DML ????
Was going to reply earlier, but as a farmer I was too busy to reply . Just going out to move some more grain so I will reply when I can .
And BTW , your not the teacher at a high school here . Don’t tell the rest of us wtf we can or can’t do or think ... so yes start a new thread if you want to chat about globalist warming , or climate change , or climate emergency, or climate catastrophe or whatever the *** you want to call it and stop derailing nearly every single thread with your preaching . It’s Canada , a free country that promotes freedom of speech , so stop the b/s .
Post some reality, did you get done harvest, how were the yields , how was quality in your area ? Did you go help neighbours? Did you have to dry much ?
Did you have enough bin space ? How are falling grades on your farm ?
This is a harvest report thread BTW ?
If not , start a new thread on globalist warming.....

[Horse]

It used to be interesting watching you 5yr olds argue over whose dad is bigger,stronger smarter,but I realy think it has run its course. Give it a rest.
Every discussion turns into a climate debate where there are no winners,,,,,just WHINERS.

[jazz]

This isnt a 5 yr old argument, its devastating logic.

So we are told if CO2 rises from 350 to 400 or to 450ppm, the earth heats 2-5 deg and we all cook. Ice all melts, coasts flood, species die, earth becomes dead zone.

So what was happening when CO2 was 3000 ppm? If there is a coorelation between CO2 and temp, that would have been a temp increase of 50 deg C. Any animal or plant you know of living now or in the past could stand temps approaching your pizza oven?

From the graph I posted the largest deltas between temp and CO2 are in the 3-6 deg range when CO2 is 10-20 times what it is now. Just for fun ignoring the non correlation, working that back, an increase of 100ppm will result in a temp increase of under a half a degree basically in the range of the earths natural volatility. Its a rounding error.

[flea beetle]

It used to be interesting watching you 5yr olds argue over whose dad is bigger,stronger smarter,but I realy think it has run its course. Give it a rest.
Every discussion turns into a climate debate where there are no winners,,,,,just WHINERS.

So leave then...