Listen to the scientists...

[jazz]

Here is how to tell bad science. Science never ever speculates. You will see lots of articles saying stuff like, although the temp blah blah is on a slower increase that predicted, current models show that it willl sharply increase in the future.....

That is blatant guessing. Name another scientific field trying to model something out 100 yrs.

Basically when NASA found out we cant send shuttles up every month to do nothing in low earth orbit and we cant get back to the moon cause somebody deleted the files from 1969, then they went all in on climate change to keep the lights on.

[farmaholic]

I like these scientists....

[recapped]

8 minute mark. Increase in CO2 always follows increase in temperature.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDOgWeTAas0&feature=youtu.be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDOgWeTAas0&feature=youtu.be

[jazz]

That's not what the geologic record says. Sounds like scale bias. I see no correlation.

[fjlip]

8 minute mark. Increase in CO2 always follows increase in temperature.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDOgWeTAas0&feature=youtu.be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDOgWeTAas0&feature=youtu.be

Very well done, logical, clear, no scary doomsday. Oh but what about all the carbonated pop on earth? That is C02 loaded adding to the infinitesimal 4 parts per 10,000 of deadly planet killing/ essential to all plants, part of our atmosphere! See how absurd the C02 logic is?

[Guest]

Strange ?, i wonder why she isnt getting 24/7 news coverage like greta ? And unlimited funding to travel and brainwash ?
Hope you watch this chuck, dml , etc
Open your mind up

[furrowtickler]

8 minute mark. Increase in CO2 always follows increase in temperature.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDOgWeTAas0&feature=youtu.be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDOgWeTAas0&feature=youtu.be

Thanks for sharing that , have not see it
Will definitely share it
Common sense should always trump hysteria

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Changing the name from global warming to climate change, to make sure all that all events can be used to justify the cause, was the equivalent of me making a prediction that the Quebec Nordiques will win the Grey cup in the 8th game in sudden death overtime by a score of 9 to 4, with the winning home run kicked in by player #24.

Then when it becomes clear that my prediction was a little off, I change it to say that all sporting events will have either a winner and loser or a tie, therefore when my great aunt's lawn bowling team loses to the octegenarians team in the old folks home, I can say , see I told you so.

OK, I admit, I know as much about sports, as Chuck does about climate,
and economics,
and humour,
and the geography of Florida,

but the point I was trying to make, is that global warming was a falsifiable hypothesis, based on a possibly viable mechanism, with a very narrow definable outcome.

Climate change is a catch all which can never be falsified, since it is all encompassing, which makes it absolutely meaningless from a scientific perspective.

[seldomseen]

Look at that,A climate thread that Chuck and company won't even post on. Must be because they can't refute any of what was said. You know they have read trough all the posts and looked at the links and they just stay silent.

If it doesn't fit their political view point they just cover their ears and scream "I Can't Hear You"
Loser socialists!

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Look at that,A climate thread that Chuck and company won't even post on. Must be because they can't refute any of what was said. You know they have read trough all the posts and looked at the links and they just stay silent.

If it doesn't fit their political view point they just cover their ears and scream "I Can't Hear You"
Loser socialists!

But didn't stop them from making new global warming threads.

[jazz]

But didn't stop them from making new global warming threads.

chuck will never chime into this thread. That's not how the green woke left operate. It isn't about debate. Its about them cherry picky the leading narrative and then bleating it endlessly and trying to beat the other side over the head before then can muster a challenge. Trying to make it go viral. When it is challenged, then its double down with the denier rhetoric then racist accusations.

climate radicals remind me of weening time back when we had cattle.

[burnt]

chuck will never chime into this thread. That's not how the green woke left operate. It isn't about debate. Its about them cherry picky the leading narrative and then bleating it endlessly and trying to beat the other side over the head before then can muster a challenge. Trying to make it go viral. When it is challenged, then its double down with the denier rhetoric then racist accusations.

climate radicals remind me of weening time back when we had cattle.

Only to a point on the weaning time issue.

Weaned our last week. The point of divergence is that after 3 days my calves came to their senses, accepted reality, quit bawling and got on with life in a most productive manner, rather than driving everyone else nuts with their racket.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Only to a point on the weaning time issue.

Weaned our last week. The point of divergence is that after 3 days my calves came to their senses, accepted reality, quit bawling and got on with life in a most productive manner, rather than driving everyone else nuts with their racket.

Isn't it amazing how animals, and most rational humans can accept that change is inevitable, and generally positive, even if it is disruptive at first. Yet the climate alarmists, are stuck on this notion that there was a perfect era, and that any departure from that utopia is necessarily bad and needs to be prevented at all costs. The ridiculous concept that there was ever a state of stasis, where the distribution of species was stable, glaciers didn't grow or shrink, weather was consistent and perfect, sea level was constant, and Agriville members had nothing to argue about.