Finance didn’t cost the carbon tax damage on ag.

[Guest]

Again in your NdP world where will all the things you want get paid for. Please explain.

oh don't you know "big corporations" will pay
apparently they dont understand the "trickle down " effect

[the big wheel]

Again in your NdP world where will all the things you want get paid for. Please explain.

Are you drinking again? What are you talking about? I don’t care what the ndp 30 years ago did I have a brain you should try using yours and look at all the facts. But at least you aren’t talking about all the shit being thrown the farmers way because maybe you Caught on it’s not the ndp from 30 years ago that are in power. Lmao.

[SASKFARMER]

I am looking at the facts Ryan and Singh are on the same page so unless it’s fairy dust explain how a NDP gov would work for farmers and Saskatchewan.

[flea beetle]

Not in favour of carbon tax but people
Are crying about it and saying nothing about the pst that costs us farmers way more. Asking people why that is?
If we want better we have to be open minded and challenge what ever has a detrimental effect on us farmers regardless of what political party brings on the problem.

The Ass party is is in government complete asses towards us farmers. Worse than ndp.
Is there a good government in Alberta right now? If there is we need to do the same punt then ass party then we ll get a good government afterwards. Otherwise we re stuck with the asses

Maybe people are angry at the carbon tax as it is another grab over top of the pst? People are already paying a consumption tax in the pst. Why do we need another one?

I get that the more you use the more you should pay. And that is what a pst tax does. I also agree with you that there should not be pst on crop insurance. There is no denying that. It isn’t something being consumed. It is an insurance.

But why should another consumption tax (carbon tax) be put in place. One already exists in the pst. That is what people are up in arms about. And I know you already said you are against the carbon tax, I am just hammering home the point of what people are thinking.

If you don’t support pst on crop insurance, rally the troops and get them fired up and try get it changed. Don’t scrap pst altogether. It helps pay for stuff by those that consume the most. You don’t consume as much, you don’t pay as much. Fair deal in my mind. But we don’t need two of them.

[TASFarms]

Maybe people are angry at the carbon tax as it is another grab over top of the pst? People are already paying a consumption tax in the pst. Why do we need another one?

I get that the more you use the more you should pay. And that is what a pst tax does. I also agree with you that there should not be pst on crop insurance. There is no denying that. It isn’t something being consumed. It is an insurance.

But why should another consumption tax (carbon tax) be put in place. One already exists in the pst. That is what people are up in arms about. And I know you already said you are against the carbon tax, I am just hammering home the point of what people are thinking.

If you don’t support pst on crop insurance, rally the troops and get them fired up and try get it changed. Don’t scrap pst altogether. It helps pay for stuff by those that consume the most. You don’t consume as much, you don’t pay as much. Fair deal in my mind. But we don’t need two of them.

We really shouldn’t have either. There is some serious miss managing of funds.

[flea beetle]

We really shouldn’t have either. There is some serious miss managing of funds.

And sadly frontline workers will end up getting cut, when there are deputies to deputies that really shouldn’t be there in the first place.

First and foremost ESSENTIAL infrastructure is what is needed and should be upkept. (Roads, hospitals, schools, etc.). And only to a certain degree. We don’t need monster hospitals where only half the beds are utilized.

We also don’t need lavish stadiums or art galleries? The old stadium with a refreshing would bring in just as many people to see a riders game would they not? At 1/4 to 1/3 the cost?

Bring spending under control, be business friendly, and upkeep essential infrastructure and the people (tax base) will follow. Taxing everybody to death and spending like a drunken sailor will get you a drunk dead sailor in the end.

[the big wheel]

And sadly frontline workers will end up getting cut, when there are deputies to deputies that really shouldn’t be there in the first place.

First and foremost ESSENTIAL infrastructure is what is needed and should be upkept. (Roads, hospitals, schools, etc.). And only to a certain degree. We don’t need monster hospitals where only half the beds are utilized.

We also don’t need lavish stadiums or art galleries? The old stadium with a refreshing would bring in just as many people to see a riders game would they not? At 1/4 to 1/3 the cost?

Bring spending under control, be business friendly, and upkeep essential infrastructure and the people (tax base) will follow. Taxing everybody to death and spending like a drunken sailor will get you a drunk dead sailor in the end.

Agreed 100%

[the big wheel]

I am looking at the facts Ryan and Singh are on the same page so unless it’s fairy dust explain how a NDP gov would work for farmers and Saskatchewan.

Your forgetting the big oil boom was a price of 110 a barrell we were still producing oil and would have been under the ndp also the ass party proved they could not manage the boom and now we’re all paying for the bust of it all. That is a fact. Wall the oil puppet told everyone prior to last election don’t worry the books are fine and what was it a matter of months when municipalities started asking where are all
The deals we agreed upon he put his tail between his legs and ran away to collect for all his oil scams and breaks he gave the oil companies which we all were left to pay for the shortfall while he collected through that bogus consulting job. What a fine job if that he did. What a *** loser

[Oliver88]

Maybe people are angry at the carbon tax as it is another grab over top of the pst? People are already paying a consumption tax in the pst. Why do we need another one?

I get that the more you use the more you should pay. And that is what a pst tax does. I also agree with you that there should not be pst on crop insurance. There is no denying that. It isn’t something being consumed. It is an insurance.

But why should another consumption tax (carbon tax) be put in place. One already exists in the pst. That is what people are up in arms about. And I know you already said you are against the carbon tax, I am just hammering home the point of what people are thinking.

If you don’t support pst on crop insurance, rally the troops and get them fired up and try get it changed. Don’t scrap pst altogether. It helps pay for stuff by those that consume the most. You don’t consume as much, you don’t pay as much. Fair deal in my mind. But we don’t need two of them.

There is no PST on crop insurance or hail insurance.

The carbon tax will be dragging a lot of farms down.

[TASFarms]

There is no PST on crop insurance or hail insurance.

The carbon tax will be dragging a lot of farms down.

There probably will be an sharp increase in diesel price before Jan 1st when they turn up the carbon tax.

[flea beetle]

There is no PST on crop insurance or hail insurance.

The carbon tax will be dragging a lot of farms down.

My apologies. I was taking his word for it. I am from Alberta.