Hemispherical Snowline Extent

[chuckChuck]

The seasonal land based snowpack has much more effect on the earths climate than some sea ice stuck at the pole trapped behind the jet stream.

It is also preceded by a meter of frost into the ground and then insulated by the snowpack all winter long and then all of it is melted released into the northern jet stream every spring which circles the global many times faster than any ocean currents.

Pesky logic.

Is that for sure or are you just speculating? You seem so sure of yourself! Some would say over confident in your assumptions. Perhaps you are "legend in your own mind"?

Do you have a degree in climatology? And can you back your claim up with data and references?
If the earth is cooling why is the sea ice pack shrinking in the northern hemisphere?

[chuckChuck]

Its great to watch self declared arm chair experts with no background in climate science draw conclusions from one graph or factor when there are many to examine before drawing conclusions.

That is why NOAA NASA, and the World meterological Association have hundreds of scientists in various disciplines who work together to peer review their work before providing analysis and drawing conclusions.

But if you believe the science is all a great conspiracy then why even use snow cover analysis from NOAA?
Isn't NOAA one of the conspirators? LOL

[jazz]

If the earth is cooling why is the sea ice pack shrinking in the northern hemisphere?

Right back at you. If the earth is warming why are all the temp records from the 1880-1930 period before the modern oil age? Why is land based snow pack unaffected?

I have a phd in common sense and that's more than enough to destroy climate radicals.

[chuckChuck]

Right back at you. If the earth is warming why are all the temp records from the 1880-1930 period before the modern oil age? Why is land based snow pack unaffected?

I have a phd in common sense and that's more than enough to destroy climate radicals.

PHD in common sense? LMAO. You are an arrogant Asinus asinorum!

Humans started burning coal thousands of years ago. Coal use increased in during the industrial revolution from about 1760 -1840 says wikipedia.

Only fools make generalized over confident sweeping statements outside of their area of knowledge.

Smart people know enough to be cautious and rely on evidence.

[AllisWD45]

PHD in common sense? LMAO. You are an arrogant Asinus asinorum!

Humans started burning coal thousands of years ago. Coal use increased in during the industrial revolution from about 1760 -1840.

Only fools make generalized over confident sweeping statements outside of their area of knowledge.

Smart people know enough to be cautious and rely on evidence.

Oh!!!

[AlbertaFarmer5]

PHD in common sense? LMAO. You are an arrogant Asinus asinorum!

Humans started burning coal thousands of years ago. Coal use increased in during the industrial revolution from about 1760 -1840.

Only fools make generalized over confident sweeping statements outside of their area of knowledge.

Smart people know enough to be cautious and rely on evidence.

Oh, the hypocrisy is thick in that post.
Those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

A certain saying about pots and kettles comes to mind also.

[chuckChuck]

List one major scientific organization that says human caused climate change is not happening.

Wait for it. Jazz will declare all scientists, economists and experts of all types are wrong! LOL

[sumdumguy]

Chuck, if you would just think:

1. CO2 is the staff of green life. Not a pollutant - INTEGRAL to our existence.

2. Fossil fuels are not the only source of energy. Man is spinning his wheels trying to replace with many other sources. And that’s all good and well, but the most challenging obstacle to take-up is the fact that safe storage of energy is a conundrum. God gave us the answer in fossil fuels, stable, efficient, compact storage but some man is never satisfied. And so we will destroy Canada just because foolish agenda has polluted some lame brains.

[fjlip]

AND there are many factors that determine CLIMATE at any time and any place on the planet. C02 is NOT the EVIL gas killing earth, it is, as said countless times by most of us reasoning people, the STAFF of plant life which makes all other life on earth possible. No plants =NO LIFE.
Dr Soon exhaled and said that is 4000 PPM. Breath out on a plant and it will thank you. You bet man influences the CLIMATE, adapt is the only reasonable response.

[chuckChuck]

Chuck, if you would just think:

1. CO2 is the staff of green life. Not a pollutant - INTEGRAL to our existence.

2. Fossil fuels are not the only source of energy. Man is spinning his wheels trying to replace with many other sources. And that’s all good and well, but the most challenging obstacle to take-up is the fact that safe storage of energy is a conundrum. God gave us the answer in fossil fuels, stable, efficient, compact storage but some man is never satisfied. And so we will destroy Canada just because foolish agenda has polluted some lame brains.

1. Water is also essential to life but too much of it in the wrong place will flood you and destroy your crop.
CO2 is essential to life but it is also a greenhouse gas that causes climate change which is scientific fact and not in dispute. Too much of it is the problem.

2. There are many sources of energy and it is only a matter of time before we switch to various low carbon sources. The transition has already begun. Canada has lots of other industries and resources to make the transition. There will be trillions of dollars of new investment in cleaner technology. Oil will still used for other reasons. It will be a long transition.

Harper said Canada will stop using fossil sources of energy by the year 2100. Why would he sign a G7 agreement saying so? Who knows for sure when this will happen.

[TASFarms]

1. Water is also essential to life but too much of it in the wrong place will flood you and destroy your crop.
CO2 is essential to life but it is also a greenhouse gas that causes climate change which is scientific fact and not in dispute. Too much of it is the problem.

2. There are many sources of energy and it is only a matter of time before we switch to various low carbon sources. The transition has already begun. Canada has lots of other industries and resources to make the transition. There will be trillions of dollars of new investment in cleaner technology. Oil will still used for other reasons. It will be a long transition.

Harper said Canada will stop using fossil sources of energy by the year 2100. Why would he sign a G7 agreement saying so? Who knows for sure when this will happen.

Harper signed it because he knows it’s a joke. What good is his signature on that document. Any politician’s signature for something 80 years in the future is worthless

[jazz]

CO2 is essential to life but it is also a greenhouse gas that causes climate change which is scientific fact and not in dispute.

It is in dispute. I just showed you why. Dispute to the facts on the ground. In dispute with logic and cherrypicked narratives. In dispute to the scientific method which has been corrupted by politics and money beggars who cant fund their research with real breakthroughs so devised a carbon scam to siphon tax payer cash so they can get back to their decade long mouse studies.