Hemispherical Snowline Extent

[fjlip]

Look how HOT it's going to be... https://www.theweathernetwork.com/ca/news/article/2019-2020-canada-winter-forecast-temperature-precipitation-snow-outlook https://www.theweathernetwork.com/ca/news/article/2019-2020-canada-winter-forecast-temperature-precipitation-snow-outlook

Refute Mickey Mouse...11,000 nobodies are SCIENTISTS... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vs3ZPGLPiss&feature=youtu.be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vs3ZPGLPiss&feature=youtu.be

After being found out they disabled signatures and viewing them. https://scientistswarning.forestry.oregonstate.edu/ https://scientistswarning.forestry.oregonstate.edu/

[furrowtickler]

Look how HOT it's going to be... https://www.theweathernetwork.com/ca/news/article/2019-2020-canada-winter-forecast-temperature-precipitation-snow-outlook https://www.theweathernetwork.com/ca/news/article/2019-2020-canada-winter-forecast-temperature-precipitation-snow-outlook

Refute Mickey Mouse...11,000 nobodies are SCIENTISTS... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vs3ZPGLPiss&feature=youtu.be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vs3ZPGLPiss&feature=youtu.be

After being found out they disabled signatures and viewing them. https://scientistswarning.forestry.oregonstate.edu/ https://scientistswarning.forestry.oregonstate.edu/

The interview with Rex and this 11,000 fake scientist viewpoint is exactly why I hold great scepticism on the “climate emergency” nonsense.
Add to the the fake temperatures used in the study on Greenland and refusal to publish or even show the “corrected” temps later by msm solidifies how disturbing this whole scam is .
The truth is being exposed for what it really is , a UN sponsored wealth distribution tax , not off industry or elite but off the backs of the middle class workers. Canada needed to step away from the UN years ago , not dive headfirst into this quagmire.

[seldomseen]

Its not worth the bother because you don't believe in climate change science or scientists and it won't change your mind anyway.

If NASA, NOAA, the World Meterological Organization can't provide enough evidence and proof for you then nothing will.

Have fun defending your childrens author take on climate science!

So if its not worth the bother to try and change our minds then why are you always on here trying to change our minds?

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Have fun defending your childrens author take on climate science!

I didn't defend him. I didn't even read it, I try to avoid exposing myself to any more confirmation bias. Instead, I keep reading what you post, trying to challenge my own biases. How about you? Have you ever risked reading or viewing something that challenges your religion? It would be much appreciated if you could make an effort to understand the science so you could formulate an informed and technical response to these links, so we could have an intellectual discussion about the underlying science and evidence. Instead of this predictable attack the source rhetoric. And then wonder why most of us won't waste the time trying to help you understand.

Is a children's author any less qualified than an actor, a 16 year old uneducated child, or a socialist disenfranchised former CWB director?

[jazz]

Its not worth the bother because you don't believe in climate change science or scientists and it won't change your mind anyway.

I made a claim with evidence just like you have with climate change. My claim refutes yours, so now show us the peer reviewed published paper that says land based snowpack extent is actually falling and not increasing and destroy my argument, if you can.

[tweety]

I made a claim with evidence just like you have with climate change. My claim refutes yours, so now show us the peer reviewed published paper that says land based snowpack extent is actually falling and not increasing and destroy my argument, if you can.

Um......

[jazz]

[QUOTE=tweety;432087]Um......

That's great, so no annual changes, spring and fall balance out and snow pack is exactly the same year over year. Nice research.

And there is still no climate change.

[Taiga]

[QUOTE=jazz;432088]

Um......

That's great, so no annual changes, spring and fall balance out and snow pack is exactly the same year over year. Nice research.

And there is still no climate change.

I guess we can conclude fall comes earlier every year, and spring comes earlier too. We need more leap years in a row to get the earth back on schedule!

[chuckChuck]

https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/snow-and-ice/extent/sea-ice/N/10

NOAA data does indeed show an increase in snow area in the autumn in the northern hemisphere.

But NOAA also shows a very dramatic drop in sea ice. Which contradicts the assumption that the climate is cooling.

Which is a more important indicator of climate, snow area or sea ice?

[jazz]

[ATTACH]5252[/ATTACH]
Which is a more important indicator of climate, snow area or sea ice?

The seasonal land based snowpack has much more effect on the earths climate than some sea ice stuck at the pole trapped behind the jet stream.

It is also preceded by a meter of frost into the ground and then insulated by the snowpack all winter long and then all of it is melted released into the northern jet stream every spring which circles the global many times faster than any ocean currents.

Pesky logic.

[TASFarms]

Um......

[ATTACH]5251[/ATTACH]

Where is that chart made up. Doesn’t look like anything that’s happened here in the last ten years

[jazz]

Where is that chart made up. Doesn’t look like anything that’s happened here in the last ten years

Its an extent graph, doesn't really affect us in Canada because we always get covered, but shows how far the pack is extending into the southern reaches of the US. Shows the season is being skewed. So when those egg heads say your degree days are increasing they forget to look at the shortened season at the back end. Its always manipulation to a narrative with the climate cult.