• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Feed Wheat Falling Number

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by farmaholic View Post
    Seems it costs more to feed livestock than humans, who would have thought!
    Wonder what net profit is on feed barley compared to Malt the last few years? All figured in quality risk and holding costs until called etc.

    Comment


      #22
      https://pricedingold.com/wheat/

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by walterm View Post
        Wonder what net profit is on feed barley compared to Malt the last few years? All figured in quality risk and holding costs until called etc.
        Done with Malt here.

        Comment


          #24
          But here is the problem
          Now some of our wheat will make a 2 , but there is a deduction because the falling number this particular time is 285
          Now this is a deduction from a # 2
          This particular pail of wheat has had falling numbers from 237-337 , same ****ing pail, with canada grain commission being 295
          But there is no added premium for the wheat we have thats 395 falling number
          So there you have it , we have a new deduction and no new premium to add to our price ?
          I dont give a **** what theyre paying me , this is bullshit , pure and simple
          Anyone recall seeing falling number requirements on wheat contracts before ??
          And what the **** is severe sprouts level at a microscopic amount of .01% at ???
          This is the same game they used to play with ergot till the fuz windfall came along
          Now ergot doesnt matter , but sprouts do because fuz has backed off ?
          Sick of the game , why in **** cant a guy just get a fair shake ?

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by caseih View Post
            But here is the problem
            Now some of our wheat will make a 2 , but there is a deduction because the falling number this particular time is 285
            Now this is a deduction from a # 2
            This particular pail of wheat has had falling numbers from 237-337 , same ****ing pail, with canada grain commission being 295
            But there is no added premium for the wheat we have thats 395 falling number
            So there you have it , we have a new deduction and no new premium to add to our price ?
            I dont give a **** what theyre paying me , this is bullshit , pure and simple
            Anyone recall seeing falling number requirements on wheat contracts before ??
            And what the **** is severe sprouts level at a microscopic amount of .01% at ???
            This is the same game they used to play with ergot till the fuz windfall came along
            Now ergot doesnt matter , but sprouts do because fuz has backed off ?
            Sick of the game , why in **** cant a guy just get a fair shake ?
            It’s a f ing joke. Sometimes I wonder if it’s not only elevator co itself pulling the bullshit but also up the chain. With the CGC running around with the potency of a gomer it’s a free for all. Transparency needs to be legislated as obviously it isn’t there. Funny how off the combine your wheat flows in to the elevator with little trouble but the same stuff later on gets picked apart. We are lucky to have lots of buyers and decent movement on most crops. Still it’s fun to see the certain ones whom are first to go on the bs bandwagon and those who tend to be more fair.

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by WiltonRanch View Post
              With the CGC running around with the potency of a gomer it’s a free for all.
              I wonder if they would even know what this means.
              What ever happened to "modernizing the Canadia Grain Act and Canadian Grain Commission"

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by blackpowder View Post
                Done with Malt here.
                2019 Malt = Big deductions

                Definition of “chitted” may vary.

                Comment


                  #28
                  I simply feel that there are areas that can yield the Malt under less expense than here. Obviously too much around.
                  Top it off with storing it for a year.
                  $1 spread isn't enough here anymore.
                  And I made it every year. But to do that you have to do twice the work and expense.

                  Comment

                  • Reply to this Thread
                  • Return to Topic List
                  Working...