• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sask Economic Outlook

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    With global climate change and the artic warming faster than the rest of the world are you ready to put your money on a railroad built on muskeg and permafrost, Lets see who is first to step up,all you climate change deniers should feel it a safe investment??

    Comment


      #17
      Originally posted by Horse View Post
      With global climate change and the artic warming faster than the rest of the world are you ready to put your money on a railroad built on muskeg and permafrost, Lets see who is first to step up,all you climate change deniers should feel it a safe investment??
      Construction methods have improved since the 1800s. If they can build skysc****rs on slurry and sand they can put a track and pipeline through MB.

      Alaska has a pipeline through the arctic and they are building a highway to Tuktyuktuk. Can be done.

      And MB which is a have not province that finally turfed their socialists should be hungry for this opportunity.

      And Churchill make more economic sense than EE, gateway or even TMX. Its all downhill, friendlier area and having commodities offshore in the middle of the country gives them an option to go east or west.

      All it would take is some leadership and vision. Instead we have limp dick running the country.
      Last edited by jazz; Dec 9, 2019, 11:24.

      Comment


        #18
        Originally posted by Horse View Post
        With global climate change and the artic warming faster than the rest of the world are you ready to put your money on a railroad built on muskeg and permafrost, Lets see who is first to step up,all you climate change deniers should feel it a safe investment??
        Obama was all in on climate change. Yet he spent $15 million on some ocean front property. Climate change is U.N. scam

        Comment


          #19
          Originally posted by jazz View Post
          Construction methods have improved since the 1800s. If they can build skysc****rs on slurry and sand they can put a track and pipeline through MB.

          Alaska has a pipeline through the arctic and they are building a highway to Tuktyuktuk. Can be done.

          And MB which is a have not province that finally turfed their socialists should be hungry for this opportunity.

          And Churchill make more economic sense than EE, gateway or even TMX. Its all downhill, friendlier area and having commodities offshore in the middle of the country gives them an option to go east or west.

          All it would take is some leadership and vision. Instead we have limp dick running the country.
          Construction methods have indeed improved,but costs have increased substanchuly, Alaska is a mountian range so probably has a firm base ,could an industry like oil survive by only shipping oil 4 or5 mo of the year? What is the shipping season ??
          All it would take is leadership and MONEY, as for limp dick I dont think so as he seems able to f--k things up quite well.

          Comment


            #20
            Originally posted by bucket View Post
            Dumb question....but couldn't it go back where it came from?
            That’s a very good question.

            Guess from unprocessed to processed the radiation levels blow out hence can’t be returned to soil that’s my assumption

            Comment

            • Reply to this Thread
            • Return to Topic List
            Working...